Transverse compression failure of unidirectional composites
Source abstract
Abstract
The mechanical response of unidirectional composites subject to uniaxial transverse compressive loads was measured and analyzed by finite element simulation. Consistency in failure plane orientation was observed when comparing simulated matrix shear band angle to measured crack angle. A model based on hexagonal packing of fibers was proposed and the shear band angle was shown to depend on the fiber volume fraction. The effects of strong and weak fiber–matrix interfaces were considered using models with randomly distributed fibers for a valid statistical analysis. The results of these models showed that the composite compressive strength increased with the fiber loading for the strong interface case, while the strength was independent of the fiber loading for the weak interface case because of interface debonding. POLYM. COMPOS., 36:756–766, 2015. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Gill Composites Center, Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science University of Southern California Los Angeles California 90089
Funding
M.C. Gill Composites Center
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.006 ↗
2. 10.1016/0010-4361(74)90548-510.1016/0010-4361(74)90548-5 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.04.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2008.04.016 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0749-6419(99)00012-110.1016/S0749-6419(99)00012-1 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1359-8368(01)00064-610.1016/S1359-8368(01)00064-6 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.02.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2007.02.001 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00057-410.1016/S0266-3538(01)00057-4 ↗
8. 10.1023/A:101852512746610.1023/A:1018525127466 ↗
9. Yee A.F. · Polym. Blends · 2000
10. 10.1115/1.364166510.1115/1.3641665 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00354-810.1016/S0020-7683(03)00354-8 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00140-610.1016/S0266-3538(96)00140-6 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.315366410.1115/1.3153664 ↗
14. 10.1177/00219983710050010610.1177/002199837100500106 ↗
15. S.T.Pinho C.G.Dávila P.P.Camanho L.Iannucci andP.Robinson NASA/TM‐2005‐213530.
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.01310.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.013 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.03.00510.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.03.005 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.02210.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.022 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.01.01410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.01.014 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.023 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.1055810.1002/pc.10558 ↗
22. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00170-510.1016/S1359-835X(98)00170-5 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0022-5096(02)00021-210.1016/S0022-5096(02)00021-2 ↗
24. Abaqus user manual v6.11 Dassault Systemes (2011).
25. Menétrey Ph. · ACI Struct. J. · 1995 · 92 · 311
26. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00018-510.1016/S1359-835X(01)00018-5 ↗
27. 10.1002/pc.75006030310.1002/pc.750060303 ↗
28. 10.1002/pc.75010060610.1002/pc.750100606 ↗
29. 10.1002/pc.75012010810.1002/pc.750120108 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.1068710.1002/pc.10687 ↗