journal article·2016-03

Mechanical reinforcement of hydrogels by nanofiber network undergoing biaxial deformation

Yuanhao Guo, Jason Drum, Cheng Qu, Miko Cakmak

Polymer Composites· Volume 37· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Hydrogels can encapsulate large quantities of water within a three‐dimensional crosslinked polymer network. Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogels have been widely used in tissue engineering, wound dressing, and drug delivery. However, the inferior mechanical properties of PVA hydrogels limit their utility in load‐bearing applications. To alleviate this deficiency, we used a hybrid electrospinning/solution casting continuous process to reinforce PVA hydrogels using polyurethane nanofibers. In this process, the nanofibers were electrospun into the wet solution cast film prior to solidification. The reinforcement of PVA hydrogels at a series of extent of water swelling was determined using a custom built bubble biaxial stretching device. The results showed that nanofibers have substantial enhancement effect on mechanical properties particularly in thin hydrogel films at high water concentrations. Reduction of nanofiber diameter was also found to increase this reinforcement due to increased interfacial area between nanofibers and hydrogels. POLYM. COMPOS., 37:709–717, 2016. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Polymer Engineering University of Akron Ohio 44325‐0301

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1201/978148228998510.1201/9781482289985 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0278-6915(02)00258-210.1016/S0278-6915(02)00258-2 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.03.04110.1016/j.memsci.2004.03.041 ↗
4. 10.1007/3-540-46414-X_210.1007/3-540-46414-X_2 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10853-007-1625-710.1007/s10853-007-1625-7 ↗
6. 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.2.1.910.1146/annurev.bioeng.2.1.9 ↗
7. 10.1023/A:101595871043510.1023/A:1015958710435 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0969-806X(98)00318-110.1016/S0969-806X(98)00318-1 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00242-810.1016/S0142-9612(00)00242-8 ↗
10. Patachia S. · 2009
11. 10.1016/0032-3861(95)95310-W10.1016/0032-3861(95)95310-W ↗
12. 10.1016/S0966-7822(98)00003-310.1016/S0966-7822(98)00003-3 ↗
13. 10.1021/ma990758710.1021/ma9907587 ↗
14. 10.1002/app.3054610.1002/app.30546 ↗
15. Finch C.A. · 1973 · 362
16. 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1990_204_249_0210.1243/PIME_PROC_1990_204_249_02 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.11.03010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.11.030 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.07.00910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.07.009 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.07.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2008.07.005 ↗
20. D. T. Mathews 2006 Dublin City University Dublin
21. 10.1002/pat.183710.1002/pat.1837 ↗
22. Ramakrishna S. · 2005 · 1010.1142/5894 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymer.2003.08.04010.1016/j.polymer.2003.08.040 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.11010.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.110 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.snb.2006.08.04210.1016/j.snb.2006.08.042 ↗
26. 10.1088/1748-6041/4/4/04410610.1088/1748-6041/4/4/044106 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.07.08110.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.07.081 ↗
28. 10.1002/pen.76015010910.1002/pen.760150109 ↗
29. Bloksma A.H. · Cereal Chem. · 1957 · 34 · 126
30. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.02.00410.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.02.004 ↗
31. Peterson W.M. · 2011
32. 10.1007/BF0055026510.1007/BF00550265 ↗