Numerical analysis on the energy absorbing characteristics of aluminum/CFRP hybrid tubes under quasi‐static crushing loading
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this study, the axial crushing behavior of aluminum/carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) hybrid tubes are systematically investigated numerically based on a three‐dimensional (3D) progressive damage model. Experiments concerning hybrid tubes with 1/1 and 2/1 lay‐up configurations are performed first to validate the numerical model. Then, the effects of chamfer at the end, stacking configuration, aluminum‐CFRP bonding state and thickness ratio of individual layers on the energy absorption characteristics of aluminum/CFRP tubes are further numerically analyzed. The simulation results suggest that the 3D progressive damage model can effectively simulate the crushing failure process and reveal the energy dissipation mechanism of aluminum/CFRP hybrid tube under crushing. It is observed that increasing the thickness of the CFRP layer does not promote the energy absorption, but the best energy absorption effect can be obtained by using a 1:1 ratio for the thicknesses of the inner and outer aluminum alloy layers in 2/1 hybrid tube. Finally, the economic performance of 2/1 hybrid tube, 1/1 hybrid tube, and aluminum alloy tube as energy‐absorbing structures is theoretically examined. The balance between mass and cost of the 2/1 hybrid tube is proven to be evidently better than that of the conventional 1/1 hybrid tube.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory for Disaster Prevention & Mitigation of Explosion & Impact Army Engineering University of PLA Nanjing China
Field Engineering College Army Engineering University of PLA Nanjing China
Department of Airfield Logistics Support Air Force Logistics College Xuzhou China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.03410.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.034 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.11210.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.112 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.06410.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.064 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.01910.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.019 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.tws.2019.10657110.1016/j.tws.2019.106571 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.02.00610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.02.006 ↗
7. 10.1016/0020-7403(93)90004-E10.1016/0020-7403(93)90004-E ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.07.01010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.07.010 ↗
9. T.Bru ProQuest Dissertations2018.
10. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.08.03010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.08.030 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.11.00710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.11.007 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.021 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.04310.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.043 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.10.04310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.10.043 ↗
15. Dong F. · Polym. Compos. · 2019 · 2021 · 42
16. Bouchet J. · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 1891 · 2000 · 60
17. 10.1002/pc.2622210.1002/pc.26222 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.009 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.01.04210.1016/j.compstruct.2014.01.042 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.005 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.10350910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103509 ↗
22. 10.1016/1359-8368(96)00002-910.1016/1359-8368(96)00002-9 ↗
23. Mirzaei M. · Compos. Struct. · 1959 · 2012 · 94
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.06.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2010.06.002 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tws.2008.10.00610.1016/j.tws.2008.10.006 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.020 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.tws.2017.12.02010.1016/j.tws.2017.12.020 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.001 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.10538010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105380 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2555010.1002/pc.25550 ↗
31. 10.1002/pc.2601910.1002/pc.26019 ↗
32. 10.1002/pc.2570510.1002/pc.25705 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11255110.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112551 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.36010.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.360 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11366010.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113660 ↗
36. Z.Ahmad M. R.Abdullah M. N. Tamin Adv. Struct. Mater.2015 70 433.10.1007/978-3-319-19443-1_35 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11265510.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112655 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10821710.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108217 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.04010.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.040 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.06810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.068 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.tws.2018.12.00210.1016/j.tws.2018.12.002 ↗
42. 10.1002/pc.2686710.1002/pc.26867 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.11.02210.1016/j.compstruc.2006.11.022 ↗
44. Zhou J. · Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Methods · 2014 · 2
45. 10.1515/secm-2021-000410.1515/secm-2021-0004 ↗
46. 10.1016/0734-743X(84)90010-110.1016/0734-743X(84)90010-1 ↗
47. 10.1177/09544062022160090110.1177/095440620221600901 ↗
48. 10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00031-510.1016/S0020-7403(01)00031-5 ↗
49. 10.1016/0734-743X(91)90005-Z10.1016/0734-743X(91)90005-Z ↗