Melt extrudate swell behavior of multi‐walled carbon nanotubes filled‐polypropylene composites
Source abstract
Abstract
The extrudate swell behavior of polypropylene (PP) composite melts filled with multi‐walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) was studied using a capillary rheometer in a temperature range from 190 to 230°C and at various apparent shear rates varying from 50 to 800 s−1. It was found that the values of the extrudate swell ratio of the composites increased nonlinearly with increasing apparent shear rates, while the values of the extrudate swell ratio decreased almost linearly with increasing temperature. The values of the melt extrudate swell ratio increased approximately linearly with increasing shear stress, while decreased approximately nonlinearly with an increase of the MWCNT weight fraction. In addition, the extrudate swell mechanisms were discussed with observation of the fracture surface of the extrudate using a scanning electronic microscopy. This study provides a basis for further development of MWCNTs reinforced polymer composites with desirable mechanical and thermal properties. POLYM. COMPOS., 38:2433–2439, 2017. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Polymer crystallization and properties · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Research Division of Green Function Materials and Equipment, School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering South China University of Technology Guangzhou 510640 People's Republic of China
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Kowloon, Hung Hom, Hong Kong People's Republic of China
Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy University of Belgrade, Karnegijeva 4 Belgrade 11000 Serbia
Funding
The Research Committee of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Liang J.Z. · J. Polym. Eng. · 2013 · 33 · 1910.1515/polyeng-2012-0084 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.08.00610.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.08.006 ↗
3. 10.1177/073168441139914010.1177/0731684411399140 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.03.01410.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.03.014 ↗
5. 10.1002/app.3243510.1002/app.32435 ↗
6. Liang J.Z. · J. Polym. Eng. · 2012 · 32 · 25910.1515/polyeng-2012-0005 ↗
7. 10.1002/app.3911410.1002/app.39114 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.01.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.01.008 ↗
9. 10.1201/978020349493610.1201/9780203494936 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.03.02210.1016/j.jiec.2014.03.022 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.11.04710.1016/j.polymer.2009.11.047 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.122245310.1126/science.1222453 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.01.04410.1016/j.polymer.2010.01.044 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.09.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.09.003 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.013 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.05.00110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.05.001 ↗
17. 10.1002/polb.2118410.1002/polb.21184 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.09.04310.1016/j.polymer.2014.09.043 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.16710.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.167 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.05.00210.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.05.002 ↗
21. Liang J.Z. · 2007