The influence of different circular hole perforations on interlaminar shear strength of a novel fiber metal laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
This study characterizes surface treated classic type fiber metal laminates (FMLs) interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) based on a glass mat reinforced polyphenylene sulphide composite and an aluminum alloy. The effect of concentration of γ‐glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane surface treatment on ILSS of adhesive bonding between aluminum sheet and composite laminates has been investigated. After determining the silane concentration, novel FML material is manufactured using a compression moulding process which involves aluminum sheets with different circular hole perforations (Array type A and B) with two circular hole diameters (ϕ3 and ϕ5 mm) and two total hole area/closed area: 0.05 and 0.06) to develop mechanical interlocking between aluminum layers and composite laminates. Tensile tests are performed to investigate the effect of different circular hole perforations on ILSS properties of FMLs. Test results show that ILSS is improved with increasing the circular hole diameter and decreased with the number of holes as correlated with undrilled FMLs. Failure modes, damage initiation, and progression of FMLs with different open hole perforations are determined with optical microscope. POLYM. COMPOS., 37:963–973, 2016. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Kocaeli University, Arslanbey Campus, School of Civil Aviation Kocaeli 41285 Turkey
Mechanical Engineering Department Kocaeli University, Umuttepe Campus 41380 Izmit Kocaeli Turkey
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.11.05910.1016/j.msea.2010.11.059 ↗
2. 10.1177/073168440934561610.1177/0731684409345616 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.07.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2009.07.014 ↗
4. 10.1007/BF0302744210.1007/BF03027442 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.13510.1016/j.msea.2006.12.135 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00258-310.1016/S0045-7825(99)00258-3 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11837-005-0067-410.1007/s11837-005-0067-4 ↗
8. Krimbalis P.P. · Compos. Mater. · 2007 · 41 · 113710.1177/0021998306067302 ↗
9. 10.1177/002199830809220710.1177/0021998308092207 ↗
10. 10.2514/1.3624210.2514/1.36242 ↗
11. 10.1177/002199830707997210.1177/0021998307079972 ↗
12. 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00050-710.1016/S1359-835X(02)00050-7 ↗
13. Available at:http://tools.ticona.com/tools/mcbasei/pdf/printpdf.php(19.09.2014).
14. 10.1002/pc.2284710.1002/pc.22847 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.02.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2009.02.012 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0143-7496(98)00026-810.1016/S0143-7496(98)00026-8 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0143-7496(96)00014-010.1016/S0143-7496(96)00014-0 ↗
18. M.O.Bora Polifenilen Sulfid (PPS) Matrisli Kompozitlerin Tabakalar Arası Kayma Dayanımlarının İyileştirilmesi PhD Thesis Kocaeli Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Kocaeli 1–187(2011).
19. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.12.05010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.12.050 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2007.09.00310.1016/j.euromechsol.2007.09.003 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.05.00810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.05.008 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00011-610.1016/S0266-3538(98)00011-6 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00124-910.1016/S0266-3538(98)00124-9 ↗
24. 10.1080/0021846049043025210.1080/00218460490430252 ↗
25. 10.1007/978-1-4899-2070-610.1007/978-1-4899-2070-6 ↗
26. 10.1002/sia.287110.1002/sia.2871 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.02.04210.1016/j.electacta.2006.02.042 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.00710.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.007 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.018 ↗