journal article·2000-08

Stamping of continuous fiber thermoplastic composites

Julie Chen, James A. Sherwood, Patricia Buso, Samuel Chow, Darin Lussier

Polymer Composites· Volume 21· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Despite demonstrated success in low volume aerospace and defense applications, structural composites remain at the periphery of high volume industries such as construction, automotive, and consumer goods because of long cycle times. Stamping provides a means of making composite sheet products at rates ten to a hundred times faster than any existing continuous fiber processes. However, to make composites stamping a viable process, one must understand how the combination of fabric architecture, tool design, and process conditions interact to produce a part free of wrinkling and tearing. In this paper, the effect of temperature, stamping rate, and boundary constraints on the material deformation is presented. The focus of this study is a co‐mingled glass/polypropylene fabric, in the form of a layer of unidirectional yarns held together by stitches. The results show that temperature variations have the greatest effect on deformation. In addition, a finite element model of parallel strips with linear constraints was shown to successfully simulate the sliding deformation or draw‐in of the stitched unidirectional material.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Structural Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/1359-835X(95)00012-Q10.1016/1359-835X(95)00012-Q ↗
2. R. B.DessenbergerandC. L.TuckerIII Numi Form 95 (1995) 1013–1017.
3. C. F.Johnson C. E.Wilks C. D.Rudd andA. C.Long Proc. Fifth Intl. Conf. Automated Comp. (ICAC '97)(1997) 61–73.
4. 10.1115/1.281227010.1115/1.2812270 ↗
5. T. M.McBride PhD Dissertation Mech Eng. Boston University (1997).
6. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00136-410.1016/S0266-3538(96)00136-4 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.1064910.1002/pc.10649 ↗
8. 10.1016/0956-7143(94)90017-510.1016/0956-7143(94)90017-5 ↗
9. 10.1016/0956-7143(92)90079-A10.1016/0956-7143(92)90079-A ↗
10. 10.1016/S1359-835X(96)00150-910.1016/S1359-835X(96)00150-9 ↗
11. Murtagh A. M. · Proc. ICCM‐10 · 1995 · 373
12. 10.1115/1.281226310.1115/1.2812263 ↗
13. 10.1016/0956-7143(93)90074-I10.1016/0956-7143(93)90074-I ↗
14. 10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00013-410.1016/S1359-835X(97)00013-4 ↗
15. A. K.Pickett J. E.Cunningham P.DeLuca A. F.Johnson P.Lefebure P.Mallon P.Sunderland C.O'Braidaigh A.Vodermeyer andW.Werner Proc. SAMPE Europe Conf. Basel(1996).