journal article·2019-05

On the anisotropic behavior of electrodes for electrical‐based monitoring of CFRP laminated composites

Khaled Almuhammadi, Arief Yudhanto, Gilles Lubineau

Polymer Composites· Volume 40· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a promising structural health monitoring technique for carbon fiber‐reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites. EIT technique has been specifically adopted as a non‐destructive testing method along with the electrical characterization methods. Electrodes are the primary component in any EIT system because they act as an interface connecting the instrument/hardware to the structure under inspection. Simulation of electrical inspection of CFRP usually assumes the electrodes to be electrically isotropic interfaces. We show here that such isotropic assumption is a very poor approximation. We experimentally investigated the electrodes contact impedance behavior on CFRP‐laminated composite specimens for different surface processing (sanding, CO2 laser, and Yb‐fiber laser). The effective electrical responses of electrodes are characterized in‐depth, so an accurate description can be proposed. Our findings emphasize that the electrodes contact impedance is strongly anisotropic, and varies largely between the on‐axis (along surface fibers) and the off‐axis (bias and perpendicular to the surface fibers) for all tested surface processing. POLYM. COMPOS., 2018. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography · Smart Materials for Construction · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) Physical Sciences and Engineering Division COHMAS Laboratory Thuwal, 23955‐6900 Saudi Arabia

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0266-3538(89)90016-X10.1016/0266-3538(89)90016-X ↗
2. 10.1299/jmmp.1.94710.1299/jmmp.1.947 ↗
3. 10.5139/IJASS.2013.14.4.35010.5139/IJASS.2013.14.4.350 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.03.03110.1016/j.compscitech.2018.03.031 ↗
5. 10.1038/380509a010.1038/380509a0 ↗
6. 10.1088/0266-5611/31/4/04500410.1088/0266-5611/31/4/045004 ↗
7. 10.1137/S003614459833361310.1137/S0036144598333613 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.08210.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.082 ↗
9. 10.1299/jmmp.4.61010.1299/jmmp.4.610 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.10.08610.1016/j.apsusc.2015.10.086 ↗
11. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.297-300.61010.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.297-300.610 ↗
12. N.Polydorides. “Image Reconstruction Algorithms in Soft‐Field Tomography” PhD Thesis University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology (2002).
13. A.Borsic. “Regularisation Methods for Imaging From Electrical Measurements” PhD Thesis Oxford Brookes University (2002).
14. 10.1177/002199831246407910.1177/0021998312464079 ↗
15. 10.1109/10.3530010.1109/10.35300 ↗
16. 10.4236/ojcm.2014.4100310.4236/ojcm.2014.41003 ↗