Mode I and mode II delamination of carbon/glass/epoxy hybrid composite: A statistics‐based analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The delamination of a carbon/glass/epoxy hybrid composite was studied experimentally to analyze the effect of reinforcement heterogeneity on data dispersion. A statistical approach was applied to evaluate the effect of the carbon/glass/epoxy hybrid composite on the individual modes (I and II) of delamination. The analysis of variance evidenced the contribution of reinforcement type in strain energy release ratio (SERR). Curve fitting for the quasi‐static test was performed with the Weibull distribution model to predict the energy release versus crack length with different reliability levels. The 60% reliability curve presented the best fit with the average of the experimental data. For all reliability levels, the hybrid composite showed an increase in SERR.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials and Technology São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Engineering Guaratinguetá São Paulo Brazil
Funding
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior · Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.02710.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.027 ↗
2. 10.1177/073168441351305010.1177/0731684413513050 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.00610.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.006 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.10042510.1016/j.coco.2020.100425 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10548010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105480 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10603610.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106036 ↗
7. Silva A. A. X. · J. Mater. Eng. Perform. · 2020 · 1
8. 10.1177/002199830708620310.1177/0021998307086203 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.11.01910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.11.019 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.02.05410.1016/j.msea.2010.02.054 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.02410.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.024 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.02.01310.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.02.013 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.04.01110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.04.011 ↗
14. Padhi A. · Adv. Comput. Methods Manuf. · 2019 · 1 · 783
15. 10.1115/1.322598010.1115/1.3225980 ↗
16. 10.1590/S0104-1428200100020000610.1590/S0104-14282001000200006 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.00410.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.004 ↗
18. 10.1080/0021846030958010.1080/00218460309580 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.02310.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.023 ↗
20. K.W.Bennett J.Koh United States Patent2015 US9063268B2 1‐4.
21. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10729510.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107295 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.10053210.1016/j.coco.2020.100532 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00170-016-9162-710.1007/s00170-016-9162-7 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.09.05210.1016/j.measurement.2015.09.052 ↗
25. Montgomery D. C. · John Wiley & Sons, Inc · 2017 · 2 · 40
26. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.09.02110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.09.021 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.03110.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.031 ↗
28. Sakthivel M. · Appl. Math. Sci. · 2015 · 9 · 3285
29. 10.1016/j.chemolab.2010.11.00610.1016/j.chemolab.2010.11.006 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.002 ↗
31. 10.1080/10298436.2018.149213210.1080/10298436.2018.1492132 ↗
32. I. Verpoest S.V. Lomov Compos Sci Technol2005 65 2563.10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.031 ↗
33. F. M.Monticeli D. C. S. Silva Monte M. Y. Shiino H. J. C. Voorwald M. O. H. Cioffi PolymEng Sci2019 59 1215.10.1002/pen.25104 ↗
34. ASTM D5528‐13 · Am. Stand. Test Methods · 2013 · 3 · 1
35. ASTMD7905 Am Stand Test Methods2014 1 1.
36. 10.1177/002199831454982110.1177/0021998314549821 ↗
37. O'Brien T. K. · Nasa/Tm 2010‐216838 · 2010 · 1 · 1
38. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.07.01810.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.07.018 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.10.02710.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.10.027 ↗
40. MetallTrans A 1983 1410.1002/j.2637-496X.1983.tb01630.x ↗
41. X. Gao R. H. Dodds R. L. Tregoning J. A. Joyce R. E. Link Fatigue Fract EngMater Struct1999 22 481.10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.00202.x ↗
42. Gonzalez F. · 24th ABCM International Congress of Mechanical Engineering · 2017 · 1 · December 3‐8, C
43. Kageyama K. · ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ. · 1995 · 1 · 19
44. 10.1016/0266-3538(94)90103-110.1016/0266-3538(94)90103-1 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11097110.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110971 ↗
46. 10.1007/s11665-016-2460-210.1007/s11665-016-2460-2 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.06.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2014.06.007 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.08.00310.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.08.003 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.06.02310.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.06.023 ↗
50. 10.4236/jmmce.2010.9200910.4236/jmmce.2010.92009 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.02.02210.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.02.022 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.09.02610.1016/j.compositesa.2011.09.026 ↗
53. Data Br 2016 6
54. J Compos Mater 2007 41