journal article·2002-04

Hygrothermal cycling effects on the durability of phenolic based composites

Kimo Chung, Kenichi Yoshioka, James C. Seferis

Polymer Composites· Volume 23· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Work has been performed to investigate the thermal and mechanical properties of carbon fiber/phenolic resin composites as engineering materials for the aerospace industry. These materials are cost effective while displaying excellent temperature and fire resistance as well as good mechanical properties. All phenolic and epoxy composite specimens used here were prepared by resin transfer molding (RTM) to model a cost‐effective process. Hygrothermal cycling effects on the property changes of phenolic composites were evaluated through thermal, mechanical, and morphological tests. The fracture performance of a phenolic composite modified with a silicone‐based additive decreased after fewer hygrothermal cycles than unmodified phenolic and epoxy composites. Results from dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) experiments showed that the modified phenolic composite was more significantly affected by the hygrothermal cycling than the unmodified phenolic composites. Fatigue tests showed that the phenolic composites that were not exposed to hygrothermal cycling had more resistance to fatigue cycles than the epoxy composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Tribology and Wear Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Niu M. C. Y. · 1992
2. Gupta M. K. · Modern Plastics · 1987 · 64 · 70
3. Boettcher A. · SAMPE J. · 1997 · 33 · 35
4. 10.1007/978-3-662-11309-710.1007/978-3-662-11309-7 ↗
5. B. B.FittsandM. D.Bessette SAE 1990 Transactions: Journal of Materials and Manufacturing 1(1990).
6. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990725)73:4<505::AID-APP6>3.0.CO;2-L10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990725)73:4<505::AID-APP6>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
7. Moore D. R. · SAE 1990 Transactions: Journal of Materials and Manufacturing · 1990 · 16
8. 10.1177/00219980077266194910.1177/002199800772661949 ↗
9. 10.1016/0010-4361(89)90659-910.1016/0010-4361(89)90659-9 ↗
10. Hillermeier R. W. · J. of Advanced Matls. · 1999 · 31 · 52
11. S. B.Shim Autoclave and Resin Transfer Processes for Thermoset Matrix Based Composites Doctorate Thesis Dept. of Chem. Eng. University of Washington Seattle Washington (1995).
12. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2329(199723)16:3<185::AID-ADV3>3.0.CO;2-P10.1002/(SICI)1098-2329(199723)16:3<185::AID-ADV3>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
13. 1998
14. ASTMD5528–94a:Standard Test Method for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber‐Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites Annual book of ASTM Std. 14.02 283(1994).
15. Pagano N. J. · 1989
16. 1988
17. 10.1177/00219983860200060610.1177/002199838602000606 ↗
18. 10.1177/07316844820010040210.1177/073168448200100402 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00023-810.1016/S1359-835X(99)00023-8 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.75016010510.1002/pc.750160105 ↗
21. Megson N. J. L. · 1958
22. 10.1016/0010-4361(92)90111-710.1016/0010-4361(92)90111-7 ↗
23. C. E.Bakis R. A.Simonds L. W.Vick andW. W.Stinchcomb ASTM STP 1059 349(1990).10.1520/STP24120S ↗
24. M. A.PortanovaandJ. W.Deaton ASTM STP 1230 368(1995).10.1520/STP14025S ↗