journal article·2020-04-13

Graphene Oxide Microfibers Promote Regenerative Responses after Chronic Implantation in the Cervical Injured Spinal Cord

Ana Domínguez-Bajo, Ankor González-Mayorga, Elisa López-Dolado, Carmen Munuera, Mar García-Hernández, María Concepción Serrano

Publisher page

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is characterized by the disruption of neuronal axons and the creation of an inhibitory environment for spinal tissue regeneration. For decades, researchers and clinicians have been devoting a great effort to develop novel therapeutic approaches which include the fabrication of biocompatible implants that could guide neural tissue repair in the lesion site in an attempt to recover the functionality of the nervous tissue. In this context, although fiberlike structures have been hypothesized to serve as a topographical guidance for axonal regrowth, work on the exploration of this type of materials is still limited for SCI. Aiming to develop such guidance platforms, we recently designed and explored in vitro reduced graphene oxide materials in the shape of microfibers (rGO-MFs). After preliminary studies to assess the feasibility of their implantation at the injured spinal cord in vivo, no evident signs of subacute local toxicity were noticed (10 days of implantation). In this work, we specifically examine for the first time the regenerative potential of these scaffolds, slightly modified in their fabrication for improved reproducibility, when chronically interfaced with a cervical spinal cord injury. After extensive characterization of their physicochemical properties and in vitro experiments with neural progenitor cells, their neural regenerative capacity in vivo is investigated in a rat experimental model of SCI after 4 months of implantation (chronic state). Behavioral tests involving the use of forelimbs are performed. Immunofluorescence studies evidence that rGO-MFs scaffolds foster the presence of neuronal structures along with blood vessels both within the epicenter and in the surroundings of the lesion area. Moreover, the inflammatory response does not worsen by the presence of this material. These findings outline the potential of rGO-MF-based scaffolds to promote regenerative features at the injured spinal cord such as axonal and vascular growth. Further studies including biological functionalization might improve their therapeutic potential by a synergistic effect of topographical and chemical cues, thus boosting neural repair after SCI.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Nerve injury and regeneration · MXene and MAX Phase Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (ICMM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Calle Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz 3, 28049 Madrid, Spain

Laboratory of Interfaces for Neural Repair, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos (HNP), Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (SESCAM), Finca la Peraleda s/n, 45071 Toledo, Spain

Research Unit of “Design and Development of Biomaterials for Neural Regeneration”, HNP-SESCAM, Joint Research Unit with CSIC, 45071 Toledo, Spain

Funding

European Regional Development Fund · Ministerio de Econom?a y Competitividad · H2020 Future and Emerging Technologies · Agencia Estatal de Investigaci?n

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.2147/JN.S14323610.2147/JN.S143236 ↗
2. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. Facts and Figures at a Glance, University of Alabama at Birmingham: Birmingham, AL, 2018.
3. 10.21037/jss.2018.11.0210.21037/jss.2018.11.02 ↗
4. 10.1038/nn.236510.1038/nn.2365 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.120316510.1126/science.1203165 ↗
6. 10.1098/rstb.2006.189010.1098/rstb.2006.1890 ↗
7. 10.1002/adhm.20160113010.1002/adhm.201601130 ↗
8. 10.1038/nn119510.1038/nn1195 ↗
9. 10.1038/nrdp.2017.1810.1038/nrdp.2017.18 ↗
10. 10.3171/2018.9.SPINE1868210.3171/2018.9.SPINE18682 ↗
11. 10.3390/ijms1803054810.3390/ijms18030548 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.10.04910.1016/j.brainres.2014.10.049 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.tice.2016.05.00810.1016/j.tice.2016.05.008 ↗
14. 10.3727/096368916X69083610.3727/096368916X690836 ↗
15. 10.1038/srep1370210.1038/srep13702 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.01.15710.1016/j.bbrc.2018.01.157 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.07710.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.077 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.02410.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.024 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.06510.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.065 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.06.07910.1016/j.carbon.2015.06.079 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.06.04510.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.06.045 ↗
22. 10.1002/adhm.20150033310.1002/adhm.201500333 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.05.01210.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.05.012 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.11.02410.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.11.024 ↗
25. 10.3389/fnsys.2017.0007110.3389/fnsys.2017.00071 ↗
26. 10.1039/C7CS00363C10.1039/C7CS00363C ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.01.00410.1016/j.msec.2018.01.004 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.09.00410.1016/j.mattod.2013.09.004 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0475810.1021/acsnano.8b04758 ↗
30. 10.1038/am.2014.4810.1038/am.2014.48 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20140052310.1002/adma.201400523 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.04.00810.1016/j.actbio.2016.04.008 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41598-017-06051-z10.1038/s41598-017-06051-z ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20150331910.1002/adma.201503319 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0020010.1021/acsnano.6b00200 ↗
36. 10.1039/C8BM00902C10.1039/C8BM00902C ↗
37. 10.1080/21691401.2019.157584310.1080/21691401.2019.1575843 ↗
38. 10.1002/adfm.20180689910.1002/adfm.201806899 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.01.02610.1016/j.actbio.2012.01.026 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.00610.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.006 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.06.03810.1016/j.actbio.2018.06.038 ↗
42. 10.2217/rme-2018-006010.2217/rme-2018-0060 ↗
43. 10.1002/jnr.2363610.1002/jnr.23636 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsomega.7b0135410.1021/acsomega.7b01354 ↗
45. 10.1063/1.243241010.1063/1.2432410 ↗
46. 10.1002/jbm.a.3205810.1002/jbm.a.32058 ↗
47. 10.1039/C4TB00652F10.1039/C4TB00652F ↗
48. 10.1016/0165-0270(93)90068-310.1016/0165-0270(93)90068-3 ↗
49. 10.1089/neu.2006.23.3610.1089/neu.2006.23.36 ↗
50. 10.1016/S0028-3908(00)00005-810.1016/S0028-3908(00)00005-8 ↗
51. 10.1016/S0166-4328(00)00328-410.1016/S0166-4328(00)00328-4 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.00910.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.009 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.02.00910.1016/j.matbio.2018.02.009 ↗
54. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2524-13.201310.1523/JNEUROSCI.2524-13.2013 ↗
55. 10.1002/cne.1016810.1002/cne.10168 ↗
56. 10.1089/neu.2014.370310.1089/neu.2014.3703 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.03710.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.037 ↗
58. 10.4103/sni.sni_329_1710.4103/sni.sni_329_17 ↗
59. 10.1038/s41393-018-0094-y10.1038/s41393-018-0094-y ↗
60. 10.1039/C5NR03698D10.1039/C5NR03698D ↗
61. 10.1093/rb/rbv01210.1093/rb/rbv012 ↗