An efficient numerical method to analyze low‐velocity impact response of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Low velocity impact behavior of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic laminates are analyzed in this article. Governing equations are derived based on the first‐order shear deformation theory and Hamilton's principle. The impact contact force history between the impactor and laminate is formulated by the Hertzian contact law. A Ritz‐based solution in space domain for various boundary conditions is developed. Solutions of the system equations in time domain are solved by the Newmark's time integration scheme. Impact parameters such as impact force history, indentation history, and contact time are considered. The accuracy of this method is validated by comparing the obtained results with those from the ABAQUS/Explicit software simulation. The effects of impact velocity, plate geometrical parameters, stacking sequence, and temperature on the dynamic response of laminates under clamped boundary condition and support boundary condition were discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Transportation Science and Engineering Beihang University Beijing China
Beijing Key Laboratory for High‐efficient Power Transmission and System Control of New Energy Resource Vehicle Beihang University Beijing China
Beijing Hangshu Vehicle Data Research Insititute Co., Ltd Beijing China
Henan Key Laboratory of Underwater Intelligent Equipment Zhengzhou Electromechanical Engineering Research Institute Zhengzhou China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s12541-012-0143-y10.1007/s12541-012-0143-y ↗
2. 10.1021/es304211510.1021/es3042115 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.10.07110.1016/j.enconman.2018.10.071 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11367-009-0127-z10.1007/s11367-009-0127-z ↗
5. 10.1016/S0034-3617(11)70073-X10.1016/S0034-3617(11)70073-X ↗
6. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.01.00410.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.01.004 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.04910.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.049 ↗
8. 10.1016/0956-7143(91)90153-810.1016/0956-7143(91)90153-8 ↗
9. 10.1016/0142-9612(96)81415-310.1016/0142-9612(96)81415-3 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.12.06910.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.12.069 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00119-210.1016/S0266-3538(03)00119-2 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.014 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmst.2016.06.01110.1016/j.jmst.2016.06.011 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.03.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2016.03.007 ↗
15. 10.1002/app.4410610.1002/app.44106 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.005 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.03710.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.037 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.11.02310.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.11.023 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.02510.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.025 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.08310.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.083 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.06610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.066 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.05410.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.054 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.05610.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.056 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.07.00310.1016/j.matdes.2009.07.003 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00138-010.1016/S0263-8223(00)00138-0 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10853-010-5142-810.1007/s10853-010-5142-8 ↗
27. 10.1080/15376494.2017.140061310.1080/15376494.2017.1400613 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.02910.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.029 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ast.2018.11.03810.1016/j.ast.2018.11.038 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10853-017-1538-z10.1007/s10853-017-1538-z ↗
31. SunC T. inComp. Mater.: Testing Design(4th Conference) ASTM International 1977.
32. 10.1016/0263-8223(85)90020-010.1016/0263-8223(85)90020-0 ↗
33. 10.1177/00219983920260140810.1177/002199839202601408 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.03010.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.030 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.015 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.07.01410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.07.014 ↗
37. 10.1007/BF0051258910.1007/BF00512589 ↗
38. 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00081-710.1016/S1359-835X(02)00081-7 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.10.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2010.10.003 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2015.11.00410.1016/j.paerosci.2015.11.004 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.06210.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.062 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.05410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.054 ↗
43. 10.3390/ma1201015310.3390/ma12010153 ↗
44. 10.1177/00219983880220010310.1177/002199838802200103 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.05.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2004.05.006 ↗
46. 10.1201/b1240910.1201/b12409 ↗
47. YangS H SunC T inComp. Mater.: Testing Design(6th Conference) ASTM International 1982.
48. 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.06.06810.1016/j.jsv.2006.06.068 ↗
49. 10.1016/0141-0296(94)90103-110.1016/0141-0296(94)90103-1 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.07410.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.074 ↗
51. 10.1177/00219983850190060110.1177/002199838501900601 ↗
52. 10.2514/3.1030610.2514/3.10306 ↗