journal article·2019-01Open access

Restructuring of coir to microfibers for enhanced reinforcement in natural rubber

Bipinbal Parambath Kanoth, Teena Thomas, Joseph M. Joseph, Sunil K. Narayanankutty

Polymer Composites· Volume 40· Issue 1

Abstract

Microfibers were prepared from coir, an important lignocellulosic fiber, by chemico‐mechanical treatment. The microfibers with a diameter of 8–13 μm were incorporated in natural rubber and the resultant biocomposites were evaluated for the reinforcing effect of microfibers. Latex stage processing employed for composite preparation reduces fiber agglomeration and provide uniform dispersion of microfibers in the elastomer matrix. Microfiber/natural rubber composites were found to exhibit significant improvement in mechanical properties compared with unfilled and macrofiber filled composites. Microfibers showed higher thermal stability compared with untreated coir. However, degradation resistance of microfiber composites remain lower with respect to vulcanized natural rubber. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:414–423, 2019. © 2017 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Polymer Science and Rubber Technology Cochin University of Science and Technology Kochi Kerala 682022 India

Department of Chemistry St. Peter's College, Kolenchery Ernakulam Kerala 682311 India

Inter University Centre for Nanomaterials and Devices, Cochin University of Science and Technology Kochi Kerala 682022 India

Funding

CUSAT

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.5254/1.353593010.5254/1.3535930 ↗
2. 10.5254/1.353518910.5254/1.3535189 ↗
3. Derringer G.C. · Rubber World · 1971 · 165 · 45
4. 10.1080/1544047080190148010.1080/15440470801901480 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10118-013-1310-z10.1007/s10118-013-1310-z ↗
6. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.08.03210.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.08.032 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.02.00310.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.02.003 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00289-015-1546-610.1007/s00289-015-1546-6 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.10.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2016.10.001 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.11.00610.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.11.006 ↗
11. 10.1590/0104-1428.172210.1590/0104-1428.1722 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.02.02810.1016/j.compositesb.2015.02.028 ↗
13. 10.1080/15583724.2016.117603710.1080/15583724.2016.1176037 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.03810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038 ↗
15. 10.1007/978-3-662-49514-8_1810.1007/978-3-662-49514-8_18 ↗
16. Varshney V. K. · 2011
17. 10.1002/anie.20046058710.1002/anie.200460587 ↗
18. 10.1021/bm049368510.1021/bm0493685 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10570-010-9405-y10.1007/s10570-010-9405-y ↗
20. 10.1007/BF0054375910.1007/BF00543759 ↗
21. 10.1201/b1607610.1201/b16076 ↗
22. 10.1002/app.1989.07037091610.1002/app.1989.070370916 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0032-3861(97)00422-910.1016/S0032-3861(97)00422-9 ↗
24. 10.1016/B978-0-08-051667-7.50013-510.1016/B978-0-08-051667-7.50013-5 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.11.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2004.11.010 ↗
26. Dannenberg E.M. · Elastomerics · 1981 · 113 · 30
27. 10.1080/0091403870807866510.1080/00914038708078665 ↗
28. 10.1002/app.2812510.1002/app.28125 ↗
29. 10.1201/978020350820610.1201/9780203508206 ↗
30. 10.1002/app.2330510.1002/app.23305 ↗
31. 10.1155/2012/29057110.1155/2012/290571 ↗
32. Varghese S. · Indian J. Nat. Rubber Res. · 1991 · 4 · 55
33. 10.1002/pc.2008610.1002/pc.20086 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.08510.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.085 ↗
35. Geethamma V. G. · 2004
36. 10.1002/app.2506510.1002/app.25065 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10965-009-9307-610.1007/s10965-009-9307-6 ↗
38. 10.1177/002199831349879010.1177/0021998313498790 ↗
39. 10.1016/0040-6031(86)85092-410.1016/0040-6031(86)85092-4 ↗
40. 10.1039/b100365h10.1039/b100365h ↗