journal article·2017-12Open access

Stochastic simulation of the influence of fibre path variability on the formation of residual stress and shape distortion

T.S. Mesogitis, A.A. Skordos, A.C. Long

Polymer Composites· Volume 38· Issue 12

Abstract

A stochastic cure simulation approach is developed and implemented to investigate the influence of fibre misalignment on cure. Image analysis is used to characterize fiber misalignment in a carbon non‐crimp fabric. It is found that variability in tow orientation is significant with a standard deviation of 1.2°. The autocorrelation structure is modeled using the Ornstein‐Uhlenbeck sheet and the stochastic problem is addressed by coupling a finite element model of cure with a Monte Carlo scheme. Simulation of the cure of an angle shaped carbon fiber‐epoxy component shows that fiber misalignment can cause considerable variability in the process outcome with a coefficient of variation in maximum residual stress up to approximately 2% (standard deviation of 1 MPa) and qualitative and quantitative variations in final distortion of the cured part with the standard deviation in twist and corner angle reaching values of 0.4° and 0.05° respectively. POLYM. COMPOS., 38:2642–2652, 2017. © 2015 The Authors Polymer Composites published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing Cranfield University Bedford MK43 0AL UK

Faculty of Engineering, Division of Materials, Mechanics & Structures University of Nottingham University Park Nottingham NG7 2RD UK

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.06.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2009.06.011 ↗
2. Endruweit A. · Compos. Part A · 2006 · 37 · 1
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.01.03510.1016/j.compscitech.2007.01.035 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0898-1221(01)00146-810.1016/S0898-1221(01)00146-8 ↗
5. Terdik G. · Publ. Math. Debrecen · 2005 · 66 · 110.5486/PMD.2005.3167 ↗
6. 10.1287/inte.28.5.2910.1287/inte.28.5.29 ↗
7. Ersoy N. · Compos. Part A · 2010 · 41 · 3
8. 10.1106/YXEA-5MH9-76J5-BACK10.1106/YXEA-5MH9-76J5-BACK ↗
9. Marc® volume D: User subroutines. Available at:www.mscsoftware.com(2011).
10. Karkanas P.I. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2000 · 77 · 7
11. 10.2514/3.81210.2514/3.812 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.02.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2015.02.009 ↗
13. 10.1080/1068276031000159861610.1080/10682760310001598616 ↗
14. Chamis C. · J. Compos. Technol. Res. · 1989 · 11 · 1
15. 10.1177/073168440504355910.1177/0731684405043559 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbon.2008.07.03510.1016/j.carbon.2008.07.035 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.12.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2010.12.006 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.01.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2009.01.004 ↗