Stochastic simulation of the influence of fibre path variability on the formation of residual stress and shape distortion
Source abstract
Abstract
A stochastic cure simulation approach is developed and implemented to investigate the influence of fibre misalignment on cure. Image analysis is used to characterize fiber misalignment in a carbon non‐crimp fabric. It is found that variability in tow orientation is significant with a standard deviation of 1.2°. The autocorrelation structure is modeled using the Ornstein‐Uhlenbeck sheet and the stochastic problem is addressed by coupling a finite element model of cure with a Monte Carlo scheme. Simulation of the cure of an angle shaped carbon fiber‐epoxy component shows that fiber misalignment can cause considerable variability in the process outcome with a coefficient of variation in maximum residual stress up to approximately 2% (standard deviation of 1 MPa) and qualitative and quantitative variations in final distortion of the cured part with the standard deviation in twist and corner angle reaching values of 0.4° and 0.05° respectively. POLYM. COMPOS., 38:2642–2652, 2017. © 2015 The Authors Polymer Composites published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing Cranfield University Bedford MK43 0AL UK
Faculty of Engineering, Division of Materials, Mechanics & Structures University of Nottingham University Park Nottingham NG7 2RD UK
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.06.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2009.06.011 ↗
2. Endruweit A. · Compos. Part A · 2006 · 37 · 1
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.01.03510.1016/j.compscitech.2007.01.035 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0898-1221(01)00146-810.1016/S0898-1221(01)00146-8 ↗
5. Terdik G. · Publ. Math. Debrecen · 2005 · 66 · 110.5486/PMD.2005.3167 ↗
6. 10.1287/inte.28.5.2910.1287/inte.28.5.29 ↗
7. Ersoy N. · Compos. Part A · 2010 · 41 · 3
8. 10.1106/YXEA-5MH9-76J5-BACK10.1106/YXEA-5MH9-76J5-BACK ↗
9. Marc® volume D: User subroutines. Available at:www.mscsoftware.com(2011).
10. Karkanas P.I. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2000 · 77 · 7
11. 10.2514/3.81210.2514/3.812 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.02.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2015.02.009 ↗
13. 10.1080/1068276031000159861610.1080/10682760310001598616 ↗
14. Chamis C. · J. Compos. Technol. Res. · 1989 · 11 · 1
15. 10.1177/073168440504355910.1177/0731684405043559 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbon.2008.07.03510.1016/j.carbon.2008.07.035 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.12.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2010.12.006 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.01.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2009.01.004 ↗