journal article·2012-02

Optimization of stress wave propagation in a multilayered elastic/viscoelastic hybrid composite based on carbon fibers/carbon nanotubes

Masoud Safdari, Marwan S. Al‐Haik

Polymer Composites· Volume 33· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The hypothesis of incorporating carbon nanotubes (CNTs) into the interfacial layers of fiber‐reinforced polymer composites fiber‐reinforced Polymers (FRPs) to enhance their mechanical properties and mitigate the stress wave propagation during a blast event is investigated. A numerical model is developed to simulate the stress wave propagation in a laminated elastic/viscoelastic FRP. Coupled with multiobjective optimization paradigms, the optimal CNTs contents in the interfacial layers are determined to minimize the stress‐to‐strength ratio in each layer. A case study demonstrating the design of a five‐layered FRP subjected to a blast event is presented. The simulation revealed that the viscoelastic properties of the matrix material contribute significantly to the energy dissipation during stress wave propagation. It is shown that addition of 0.69% CNTs by volume to the epoxy interface significantly enhances the ability of composite to resist blast loading. Results were compared with a standard model that assumes only elastic behavior. POLYM. COMPOS., 2012. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Karbhari V.M. · 2007
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:8(1243)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:8(1243) ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.09.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2006.09.010 ↗
4. 10.1163/15685610232025683710.1163/156856102320256837 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00114-410.1016/S0263-8223(03)00114-4 ↗
6. Abrate S. · 2005
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.02910.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.029 ↗
8. 10.1115/1.162910910.1115/1.1629109 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2003.09.03410.1016/j.compstruct.2003.09.034 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.03.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2007.03.002 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.11.00410.1016/j.compstruc.2007.11.004 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.08.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2007.08.008 ↗
13. 10.1007/BF0054374710.1007/BF00543747 ↗
14. Avva V.S. · ASTM STP · 1986 · 893 · 196
15. 10.1177/00219983940280160410.1177/002199839402801604 ↗
16. 10.1038/354056a010.1038/354056a0 ↗
17. 10.1007/s00339005073410.1007/s003390050734 ↗
18. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112601.13492510.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112601.134925 ↗
19. 10.1088/0957-4484/16/3/01410.1088/0957-4484/16/3/014 ↗
20. 10.1088/0022-3727/35/16/10310.1088/0022-3727/35/16/103 ↗
22. Lampman S.R. · 1997
23. Miracle D.B. · 2001
24. 10.1002/polb.2012610.1002/polb.20126 ↗
25. 10.1002/marc.20050023410.1002/marc.200500234 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.01010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.010 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.05.03610.1016/j.polymer.2004.05.036 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.235632510.1063/1.2356325 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.161663810.1063/1.1616638 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20030493210.1002/adma.200304932 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.12212510.1063/1.122125 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.04.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2004.04.002 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.007 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.020 ↗
35. Lazan B.J. · 1968
36. Li‐Ming Y. · 2007
37. Li‐ming Y. · 2007
38. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.02.01710.1016/j.compstruct.2011.02.017 ↗
39. Kolsky H. · 1963
40. Li‐Ming Y. · 2007
41. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.03.02810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.03.028 ↗
42. Adams B.M. · 2009
43. 10.1093/comjnl/7.2.14910.1093/comjnl/7.2.149 ↗
44. Adams B.M. · 2009
45. 10.1145/321062.32106910.1145/321062.321069 ↗
46. 10.1007/BF0094189210.1007/BF00941892 ↗