Influence of magnetic nanoparticles on the mechano-magnetic response of wet-spun sodium alginate-nanocellulose filaments
Source abstract
Abstract
Hybrid filaments are of growing interest for a wide range of applications, including those that require stimuli-responsiveness. In this study we developed magnetic filaments by combining the properties of inorganic nanoparticles with the low density, flexibility and morphological features of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO)-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils (TOCNF). The hybrid filaments were synthesized by wet spinning of TOCNF using sodium alginate (SA) adjuvant in a hydrogel containing magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ) nanoparticles (NPs) formed in-situ by nucleation and grow. The relationship between synthesis conditions and filament mechanical and magnetic properties were investigated at NP loading as high as 25%. Saturation magnetization of 1.60, 11.31, 19.41, and 33.25 emu/g Fe 3 O 4 were measured at 5, 10, 15, and 25% NPs with a penalty in filament tensile strength which nevertheless reached at least 118 GPa along with low magnetite crystal orientation. Such high strength is rarely reported and found to depend on cellulose crystal orientation. The magnetic filaments were found suitable to replace traditional magnetic systems but add to the opportunity to develop flexible microwave adsorption textiles, artificial muscles, and micro-sensors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Material Properties and Processing · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Ba-Abbad MM, Benamour A, Ewis D et al (2022) Synthesis of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles with Different Shapes Through a Co-Precipitation Method and Their Application. JOM 74:3531–3539. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11837-022-05380-310.1007/S11837-022-05380-3 ↗
2. Bedê PM, da Silva MHP, da Figueiredo AB-H, S, Finotelli PV, (2017) Nanostructured magnetic alginate composites for biomedical applications. Polímeros 27:267–272. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1428.226710.1590/0104-1428.2267 ↗
3. Bhattarai N, Li Z, Edmondson D, Zhang M (2006) Alginate-Based Nanofibrous Scaffolds: Structural, Mechanical, and Biological Properties. Adv Mater 18:1463–1467. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20050253710.1002/adma.200502537 ↗
4. Blaney L (2007) Magnetite (Fe3O4): Properties, synthesis, and applications
5. Chen C, Jiang X, Kaneti YV, Yu A (2013) Design and construction of polymerized-glucose coated Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles for delivery of aspirin. Powder Technol 236:157–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2012.03.00810.1016/j.powtec.2012.03.008 ↗
6. Chiellini E, Solaro R (2003) Biodegradable Polymers and Plastics. Springer, US, Boston, MA10.1007/978-1-4419-9240-6 ↗
7. Denizot B, Tanguy G, Hindre F et al (1999) Phosphorylcholine Coating of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. J Colloid Interface Sci 209:66–71. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1998.585010.1006/jcis.1998.5850 ↗
8. Elrhman HMA (2020) Synthesis and characterization of core-shell magnetite nanoparticles with modified nano-cellulose for removal of radioactive ions from aqueous solutions. Results in Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinma.2020.10013810.1016/j.rinma.2020.100138 ↗
9. Fan L, Du Y, Wang X et al (2005) Preparation and Characterization of Alginate/Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Blend Fibers. Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part A 42:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1081/MA-20004095610.1081/MA-200040956 ↗
10. Fan L, Zhu H, Zheng H et al (2007) Structure and properties of blend fibers prepared from alginate and konjac glucomannan. J Appl Polym Sci 106:3903–3907. https://doi.org/10.1002/APP.2708810.1002/APP.27088 ↗
11. French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21:885–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-410.1007/s10570-013-0030-4 ↗
12. Gadelmawla ES, Koura MM, Maksoud TMA et al (2002) Roughness parameters. J Mater Process Technol 123:133–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00060-210.1016/S0924-0136(02)00060-2 ↗
13. Hastak V, Bandi S, Kashyap S et al (2018) Antioxidant efficacy of chitosan/graphene functionalized superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. J Mater Sci Mater Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10856-018-6163-010.1007/S10856-018-6163-0 ↗
14. He Y, Du E, Zhou X et al (2020) Wet-spinning of fluorescent fibers based on gold nanoclusters-loaded alginate for sensing of heavy metal ions and anti-counterfeiting. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 230:118031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2020.11803110.1016/j.saa.2020.118031 ↗
15. Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H (2011) TEMPO-Oxidized Cellulose Nanofibers. Nanoscale 3:71–85. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0NR00583E10.1039/C0NR00583E ↗
16. Iwamoto S, Isogai A, Iwata T (2011) Structure and Mechanical Properties of Wet-Spun Fibers Made from Natural Cellulose Nanofibers. Biomacromol 12:831–836. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm101510r10.1021/bm101510r ↗
17. Johar N, Ahmad I, Dufresne A (2012) Extraction, preparation and characterization of cellulose fibres and nanocrystals from rice husk. Ind Crops Prod 37:93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.12.01610.1016/j.indcrop.2011.12.016 ↗
18. Khan I, Khan I, Saeed K et al (2023) Polymer nanocomposites: an overview. Design, Synthesis, Functionalization, Properties, and Applications, Smart Polymer Nanocomposites. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91611-0.00017-710.1016/B978-0-323-91611-0.00017-7 ↗
19. Kim S-W, Kwon S-N, Na S-I (2019) Stretchable and electrically conductive polyurethane- silver/graphene composite fibers prepared by wet-spinning process. Compos B Eng 167:573–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.03510.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.035 ↗
20. Levanič J, Šenk VP, Nadrah P et al (2020) Analyzing TEMPO-Oxidized Cellulose Fiber Morphology: New Insights into Optimization of the Oxidation Process and Nanocellulose Dispersion Quality. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8:17752–17762. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0598910.1021/acssuschemeng.0c05989 ↗
21. Li X, Zhang B, Ju C et al (2011) Morphology-controlled synthesis and electromagnetic properties of porous Fe3O4 nanostructures from iron alkoxide precursors. J Phys Chem C 115:12350–12357. https://doi.org/10.1021/JP203147Q10.1021/JP203147Q ↗
22. Li Y, Zhu H, Gu H et al (2013) Strong transparent magnetic nanopaper prepared by immobilization of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in a nanofibrillated cellulose network. J Mater Chem A Mater 1:15278–15283. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TA12591B10.1039/C3TA12591B ↗
23. Liao M-H, Chen D-H (2002) Preparation and characterization of a novel magnetic nano-adsorbent. J Mater Chem 12:3654–3659. https://doi.org/10.1039/b207158d10.1039/b207158d ↗
24. Liu H, Brinson LC (2008) Reinforcing efficiency of nanoparticles: A simple comparison for polymer nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 68:1502–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.03310.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.033 ↗
25. Liu F, Cao PJ, Zhang HR et al (2005) Novel Nanopyramid Arrays of Magnetite. Adv Mater 17:1893–1897. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20050036710.1002/adma.200500367 ↗
26. Liu J, Cheng J, Che R et al (2013) Synthesis and microwave absorption properties of yolk-shell microspheres with magnetic iron oxide cores and hierarchical copper silicate shells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:2503–2509. https://doi.org/10.1021/AM303043210.1021/AM3030432 ↗
27. Mincheva R, Stoilova O, Penchev H et al (2008) Synthesis of polymer-stabilized magnetic nanoparticles and fabrication of nanocomposite fibers thereof using electrospinning. Eur Polym J 44:615–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.11.00110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.11.001 ↗
28. Miyauchi M, Simmons TJ, Miao J et al (2011) Electrospun Polyvinylpyrrolidone Fibers with High Concentrations of Ferromagnetic and Superparamagnetic Nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:1958–1964. https://doi.org/10.1021/am200187x10.1021/am200187x ↗
29. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J et al (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00108b10.1039/c0cs00108b ↗
30. Nazari A (2017) Treatment of enzymatic wool with Fe3O4 nanoparticles and citric acid to enhance mechanical properties using RSM. J Text Inst 108:1572–1583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2016.126760110.1080/00405000.2016.1267601 ↗
31. Nishiyama Y, Kuga S, Wada M, Okano T (1997) Cellulose Microcrystal Film of High Uniaxial Orientation. Macromolecules 30:6395–6397. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma970503y10.1021/ma970503y ↗
32. Oprea M, Panaitescu DM (2020) Nanocellulose Hybrids with Metal Oxides Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications. Molecules 25:4045. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2518404510.3390/molecules25184045 ↗
33. Otenda BV, Kareru PG, Madivoli ES et al (2022) Cellulose Nanofibrils from Sugarcane Bagasse as a Reinforcing Element in Polyvinyl Alcohol Composite Films for Food Packaging. Journal of Natural Fibers 19:3585–3597. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.184871210.1080/15440478.2020.1848712 ↗
34. Park J-S, Park C-W, Han S-Y et al (2021) Preparation and Properties of Wet-Spun Microcomposite Filaments from Various CNFs and Alginate. Polymers (Basel) 13:1709. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1311170910.3390/polym13111709 ↗
35. Sa V, Kornev KG (2011) A method for wet spinning of alginate fibers with a high concentration of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon N Y 49:1859–1868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.01.00810.1016/j.carbon.2011.01.008 ↗
36. Sahoo B, Devi KSP, Banerjee R et al (2013) Thermal and pH Responsive Polymer-Tethered Multifunctional Magnetic Nanoparticles for Targeted Delivery of Anticancer Drug. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:3884–3893. https://doi.org/10.1021/am400572b10.1021/am400572b ↗
37. Saito T, Hirota M, Tamura N et al (2009) Individualization of nano-sized plant cellulose fibrils by direct surface carboxylation using TEMPO catalyst under neutral conditions. Biomacromol 10:1992–1996. https://doi.org/10.1021/BM900414T10.1021/BM900414T ↗
38. Schmidt AM (2006) Electromagnetic Activation of Shape Memory Polymer Networks Containing Magnetic Nanoparticles. Macromol Rapid Commun 27:1168–1172. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.20060022510.1002/marc.200600225 ↗
39. Shi Z, Phillips GO, Yang G (2013) Nanocellulose Electroconductive Composites Nanoscale 5:3194–3201. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR00408B10.1039/C3NR00408B ↗
40. Uddin KMA, Lokanathan AR, Liljeström A et al (2014) Silver nanoparticle synthesis mediated by carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals. Green Mater 2:183–192. https://doi.org/10.1680/gmat.14.0001010.1680/gmat.14.00010 ↗
41. Verma D, Fortunati E (2019) Biopolymer processing and its composites. In: Biomass, Biopolymer-Based Materials, and Bioenergy. Woodhead Publishing, pp 3–2310.1016/B978-0-08-102426-3.00001-1 ↗
42. Wang L, Yu Y, Chen PC et al (2008) Electrospinning synthesis of C/Fe3O4 composite nanofibers and their application for high performance lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 183:717–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.05.07910.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.05.079 ↗
43. Wang L, Ago M, Borghei M et al (2019) Conductive Carbon Microfibers Derived from Wet-Spun Lignin/Nanocellulose Hydrogels. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:6013–6022. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0608110.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06081 ↗
44. Wang L, Borghei M, Ishfaq A et al (2020) Mesoporous Carbon Microfibers for Electroactive Materials Derived from Lignocellulose Nanofibrils. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8:8549–8561. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0076410.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00764 ↗
45. Xu J, Deng X, Dong Y et al (2020) High-strength, transparent and superhydrophobic nanocellulose/nanochitin membranes fabricated via crosslinking of nanofibers and coating F-SiO2 suspensions. Carbohydr Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11669410.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116694 ↗
46. Yavuz CT, Mayo JT, Yu WW et al (1979) (2006) Low-Field Magnetic Separation of Monodisperse Fe 3 O 4 Nanocrystals. Science 314:964–967. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.113147510.1126/science.1131475 ↗
47. Yazid NA, Joon YC (2019) Co-precipitation synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles for efficient removal of heavy metal from synthetic wastewater. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. American Institute of Physics Inc., p 02001910.1063/1.5117079 ↗
48. Zare Y (2016) Study of nanoparticles aggregation/agglomeration in polymer particulate nanocomposites by mechanical properties. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 84:158–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.01.02010.1016/j.compositesa.2016.01.020 ↗
49. Zhang H, Xia JY, Pang XL et al (2017) Magnetic nanoparticle-loaded electrospun polymeric nanofibers for tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng, C 73:537–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.11610.1016/j.msec.2016.12.116 ↗
50. Zhao Z, Geng C, Zhao X et al (2019) Preparation of CdTe/Alginate Textile Fibres with Controllable Fluorescence Emission through a Wet-Spinning Process and Application in the Trace Detection of Hg2+ Ions. Nanomaterials 9:570. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano904057010.3390/nano9040570 ↗
51. Zheng Y, Yang J, Zheng W et al (2013) Synthesis of flexible magnetic nanohybrid based on bacterial cellulose under ultrasonic irradiation. Mater Sci Eng, C 33:2407–2412. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2013.02.00710.1016/J.MSEC.2013.02.007 ↗
52. Zhou G, Byun J-H, Oh Y et al (2017) Highly Sensitive Wearable Textile-Based Humidity Sensor Made of High-Strength, Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube/Poly(vinyl alcohol) Filaments. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:4788–4797. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b1244810.1021/acsami.6b12448 ↗