journal article·2016-04

Effects of hybrid nucleating agents on glass fiber‐reinforced polyethylene terephthalate/polybutylene terephthalate alloy crystallization

Jie‐Hui Fu, Xiao‐Dong Chen, Qun‐Jie Xu, Rui‐Yuan Wang, Xi‐Jun Wang

Polymer Composites· Volume 37· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

In this article, the Surlyn® 8920 and AX 8900 were mixed as hybrid nucleating agents for glass fiber (GF)‐reinforced polyethylene terephthalate (PET)/polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) alloy. The crystallization behaviors on GF‐reinforced PET/PBT alloy with compound nucleating agents of Surlyn® 8920 and AX 8900 were studied by differential scanning calorimeter. The Jeziorny method, Mo method, and Kissinger method were used for studying the non‐isothermal crystallization process of the composite alloys. While single AX 8900 cannot further improve the crystallization properties of the alloy and reduced the crystallization rate, the introduction of Surlyn® 8920 can effectively ameliorate the condition. The results demonstrated the hybrid nucleating agents of Surlyn® 8920 and AX 8900 not only can accelerate crystal growth, but also can significantly reduce the energy barrier, and it has a good effect in the alloy to the nucleation. POLYM. COMPOS. 37:1167–1172, 2016. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Materials Protection and Advanced Materials in Electric Power, College of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power Shanghai 200090 China

Shanghai Sunny New Technology Development Co. Ltd. Shanghai 201109 China

Funding

Shanghai Plan of Union

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Wei J.R. · 2011 · 5
2. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.03.02010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.03.020 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2237910.1002/pc.22379 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.06.00610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.06.006 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.09.00110.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.09.001 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.01.00710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.01.007 ↗
7. Wu W. · Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2013 · 29 · 67
8. 10.1002/pc.2219110.1002/pc.22191 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jaap.2012.03.00610.1016/j.jaap.2012.03.006 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.2242610.1002/pc.22426 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.02.01810.1016/j.polymer.2009.02.018 ↗
12. 10.1002/app.183510.1002/app.1835 ↗
13. 10.1002/pen.2003010.1002/pen.20030 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.05.02610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.05.026 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.10.08110.1016/j.msea.2010.10.081 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.12.01510.1016/j.polymer.2008.12.015 ↗
17. Zhu C.S. · China Plast. Ind. · 2013 · 41 · 105
18. Wang R.‐Y. · China Plast. Ind. · 2014 · 42 · 34
19. 10.1016/j.tca.2013.12.00610.1016/j.tca.2013.12.006 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.tca.2012.11.02510.1016/j.tca.2012.11.025 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.tca.2012.07.00810.1016/j.tca.2012.07.008 ↗
22. 10.1002/pen.2089210.1002/pen.20892 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2008.06.01010.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2008.06.010 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tca.2007.10.00410.1016/j.tca.2007.10.004 ↗
25. Zhishen M. · Acta Polym. Sin. · 2008 · 42 · 656
26. 10.1016/j.jaap.2012.09.00310.1016/j.jaap.2012.09.003 ↗