Effects of hybrid nucleating agents on glass fiber‐reinforced polyethylene terephthalate/polybutylene terephthalate alloy crystallization
Source abstract
Abstract
In this article, the Surlyn® 8920 and AX 8900 were mixed as hybrid nucleating agents for glass fiber (GF)‐reinforced polyethylene terephthalate (PET)/polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) alloy. The crystallization behaviors on GF‐reinforced PET/PBT alloy with compound nucleating agents of Surlyn® 8920 and AX 8900 were studied by differential scanning calorimeter. The Jeziorny method, Mo method, and Kissinger method were used for studying the non‐isothermal crystallization process of the composite alloys. While single AX 8900 cannot further improve the crystallization properties of the alloy and reduced the crystallization rate, the introduction of Surlyn® 8920 can effectively ameliorate the condition. The results demonstrated the hybrid nucleating agents of Surlyn® 8920 and AX 8900 not only can accelerate crystal growth, but also can significantly reduce the energy barrier, and it has a good effect in the alloy to the nucleation. POLYM. COMPOS. 37:1167–1172, 2016. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Materials Protection and Advanced Materials in Electric Power, College of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power Shanghai 200090 China
Shanghai Sunny New Technology Development Co. Ltd. Shanghai 201109 China
Funding
Shanghai Plan of Union
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Wei J.R. · 2011 · 5
2. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.03.02010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.03.020 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2237910.1002/pc.22379 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.06.00610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.06.006 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.09.00110.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.09.001 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.01.00710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.01.007 ↗
7. Wu W. · Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2013 · 29 · 67
8. 10.1002/pc.2219110.1002/pc.22191 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jaap.2012.03.00610.1016/j.jaap.2012.03.006 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.2242610.1002/pc.22426 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.02.01810.1016/j.polymer.2009.02.018 ↗
12. 10.1002/app.183510.1002/app.1835 ↗
13. 10.1002/pen.2003010.1002/pen.20030 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.05.02610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.05.026 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.10.08110.1016/j.msea.2010.10.081 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.12.01510.1016/j.polymer.2008.12.015 ↗
17. Zhu C.S. · China Plast. Ind. · 2013 · 41 · 105
18. Wang R.‐Y. · China Plast. Ind. · 2014 · 42 · 34
19. 10.1016/j.tca.2013.12.00610.1016/j.tca.2013.12.006 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.tca.2012.11.02510.1016/j.tca.2012.11.025 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.tca.2012.07.00810.1016/j.tca.2012.07.008 ↗
22. 10.1002/pen.2089210.1002/pen.20892 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2008.06.01010.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2008.06.010 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tca.2007.10.00410.1016/j.tca.2007.10.004 ↗
25. Zhishen M. · Acta Polym. Sin. · 2008 · 42 · 656
26. 10.1016/j.jaap.2012.09.00310.1016/j.jaap.2012.09.003 ↗