Experimental analysis and theoretical modeling of the mechanical behavior of starch‐grafted‐polypropylene/kenaf fibers composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Mechanical properties of starch‐grafted‐polypropylene/kenaf fibers (KF) composites were investigated and compared to different theoretical models. In this work, the composites were prepared via melt compounding and compression molding processes at different KF loadings, that is, 10, 20, and 30 wt%. Tensile, fracture toughness and fatigue tests were performed. Generally, the mechanical properties increased with increasing kenaf fiber loadings. This is attributed to the good filler‐matrix interactions between KF and starch‐grafted‐polypropylene, as observed by scanning electron microscopy. Tensile properties were modeled using the rule of mixture, the Kelly‐Tyson and the Halpin‐Tsai models. Fatigue data were also modeled using different theoretical models to fit both S–N and normalized S–N curves with simple linear model and Boltzmann sigmoidal function. POLYM. COMPOS., 39:3289–3299, 2018. © 2017 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Polymer crystallization and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Cluster for Polymer Composites, Science and Engineering Research Centre, Engineering Campus Universiti Sains Malaysia Nibong Tebal Penang 14300 Malaysia
Physics of Geological Processes, Department of Physics University of Oslo Oslo Norway
Department of Industrial Engineering University of Trento Trento 38123 Italy
School of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering Universiti Sains Malaysia Nibong Tebal Penang 14300 Malaysia
Funding
USM Research University Cluster · Erasmus Mundus One More Step mobility
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adv.2128210.1002/adv.21282 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.04310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.043 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.00810.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.008 ↗
4. 10.1002/app.3318410.1002/app.33184 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.1055510.1002/pc.10555 ↗
6. Hao A. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2014 · 131
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.014 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.001 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.11.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2012.11.010 ↗
10. 10.1177/073168441560979210.1177/0731684415609792 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.07310.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.073 ↗
12. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.695.15910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.695.159 ↗
13. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.465-466.96210.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.465-466.962 ↗
14. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.795.63110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.795.631 ↗
15. 10.1002/pen.2386810.1002/pen.23868 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.00310.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.003 ↗
17. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1024.26710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1024.267 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.10.00810.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.10.008 ↗
19. 10.1002/app.3404610.1002/app.34046 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10924-012-0516-410.1007/s10924-012-0516-4 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.487379810.1063/1.4873798 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.10.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2010.10.001 ↗
23. Humairah A.R.N. · Adv. Environ. Biol. · 2014 · 8 · 765
24. 10.1080/03602559.2013.84370910.1080/03602559.2013.843709 ↗
25. 10.1166/jbmb.2012.123910.1166/jbmb.2012.1239 ↗
26. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.9910.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.99 ↗
27. 10.1201/978142001424210.1201/9781420014242 ↗
28. 10.1007/b13716210.1007/b137162 ↗
29. 10.1007/s00226-010-0351-510.1007/s00226-010-0351-5 ↗
30. 10.1002/pen.76016051210.1002/pen.760160512 ↗
31. Tsai P. N. · 1968
32. 10.1063/1.165850610.1063/1.1658506 ↗
33. Kelly R. W. T. A. · 1965
34. 10.1177/002199831351487510.1177/0021998313514875 ↗
35. 10.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-910.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-9 ↗
36. 10.1007/BF0055069810.1007/BF00550698 ↗
37. 10.1177/073168441141791710.1177/0731684411417917 ↗
38. 10.1002/pc.2328910.1002/pc.23289 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.010 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.11.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2008.11.005 ↗
41. Mallick P. K. · 1993
42. 10.1002/app.1970.07014060410.1002/app.1970.070140604 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.04.01110.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.04.011 ↗
44. 10.1023/A:101855710778610.1023/A:1018557107786 ↗
45. 10.1002/pssb.20057271710.1002/pssb.200572717 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.06210.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.062 ↗
47. 10.1023/B:FRAC.0000018230.97560.ae10.1023/B:FRAC.0000018230.97560.ae ↗
48. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.03410.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.034 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.05.03310.1016/j.polymer.2013.05.033 ↗
50. Standard Test Method for Fracture Toughness and Strain Energy Release Rate of Plastic Materials (ASTM D5045‐99) American Society for Testing and Materials (1999).
51. 10.1007/BF0003218710.1007/BF00032187 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.01210.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.012 ↗
53. 10.1177/002199831142562010.1177/0021998311425620 ↗
54. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2000)12:2(97)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2000)12:2(97) ↗
55. Mandell J. F. · 1991
56. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.009 ↗