journal article·2020-05

Nonisothermal crystallization behavior of polylactide/polyethylene glycol/graphene oxide nanosheets composite films

Jasim Ahmed, Giorgio Luciano, Sofia Maggiore

Polymer Composites· Volume 41· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The nonisothermal crystallization (NIC) behavior of solution‐cast polylactide (PLA)/polyethylene glycol (PEG)/graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets composite (PLA/PEG/GO) films was examined at the selected cooling rate. The crystallization temperature (Tc) of the PLA/PEG matrix improved with increasing the reinforcement of GO (0.5%‐2% w/w) at a constant cooling rate. Various conventional crystallization models, namely, Jeziorny, Ozawa, and Mo were employed to elucidate the NIC kinetics of the PLA/PEG/GO composite films. Results showed that the Mo equation was the best model to describe the NIC of the nanocomposite films. The activation energy (E) of crystallization was estimated by Friedman's method, and the values varied from 18 to 186 kJ·mol−1, however, the values were not systematic with the loading concentration of GO.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Polymer crystallization and properties · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Food and Nutrition Program, Environment & Life Sciences Research Center, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research Safat Kuwait

The Institute for Macromolecular Studies, CNR‐ISMAC Via De Marini 6 Torre Francia Genova Italy

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/1094291090312528410.1080/10942910903125284 ↗
2. 10.1021/am201564f10.1021/am201564f ↗
3. 10.1021/acsami.6b0282810.1021/acsami.6b02828 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2007.10.04610.1016/j.jpcs.2007.10.046 ↗
5. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01809.x10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01809.x ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jtice.2012.12.01210.1016/j.jtice.2012.12.012 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.02.03410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.02.034 ↗
8. 10.1111/1750-3841.1412110.1111/1750-3841.14121 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.tca.2010.08.00410.1016/j.tca.2010.08.004 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.2425810.1002/pc.24258 ↗
11. 10.1007/s12221-011-0180-710.1007/s12221-011-0180-7 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20080177610.1002/adfm.200801776 ↗
13. 10.1002/app.3937110.1002/app.39371 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.15610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.156 ↗
15. 10.1080/03602559.2012.68904710.1080/03602559.2012.689047 ↗
16. 10.1021/ma102036h10.1021/ma102036h ↗
17. 10.1016/j.tca.2014.05.03910.1016/j.tca.2014.05.039 ↗
18. 10.1295/polymj.PJ200813310.1295/polymj.PJ2008133 ↗
19. 10.1002/pc.2426110.1002/pc.24261 ↗
20. Yang J. · J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. · 2006 · 110 · 15198
21. 10.1016/0032-3861(78)90060-510.1016/0032-3861(78)90060-5 ↗
22. 10.1023/A:102396802668410.1023/A:1023968026684 ↗
23. 10.1002/app.2984410.1002/app.29844 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tca.2016.11.01610.1016/j.tca.2016.11.016 ↗
25. 10.1016/0032-3861(71)90041-310.1016/0032-3861(71)90041-3 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10973-009-0014-710.1007/s10973-009-0014-7 ↗
27. 10.1021/ie400419910.1021/ie4004199 ↗