Vibration effects on tensile properties of adhesively bonded single lap joints in composite materials
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of cyclic‐vibration‐loading on failure loads of adhesively bonded composites. For this purpose, experimental studies were performed for composite adherents with single lap joint. Manufactured eight‐layered E/glass‐epoxy composite plates with single lap joints were subjected to dynamic cyclic loading via vibration motor, which delivered a force of 160 N at a frequency of 50 Hz. and then tested under tensile loading to investigate the joint strength. The behavior of adhesively bonded joints under various vibration cycles was observed and failure mechanisms of joints were also discussed. It was observed that a significant decrement in the strength of the vibrated joints when compared with that of the non‐vibrated joints. However, the joint performance increased up to a certain value of vibration load cycle. After a certain value of vibration load cycle, the joint performance dropped suddenly. Besides, the light‐fiber‐tear failure was observed in the overlap region of all joints. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:1258–1267, 2019. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering İzmir Kâtip Çelebi University Çiğli İzmir Turkey
Funding
İzmir Kâtip Çelebi University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Office
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-3-642-01169-610.1007/978-3-642-01169-6 ↗
2. 10.3844/ajeassp.2016.439.44110.3844/ajeassp.2016.439.441 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.03.04310.1016/j.compstruct.2016.03.043 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.03910.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.039 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.07110.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.071 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.021 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.07.01910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.07.019 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.01.02610.1016/j.compscitech.2017.01.026 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.04.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2017.04.001 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.018 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.01010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.010 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.04.02110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.04.021 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.00110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.001 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.12.00510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.12.005 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.05210.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.052 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.11.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2008.11.006 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2010.01.00410.1016/j.mechrescom.2010.01.004 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.08410.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.084 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.08.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2016.08.010 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.08010.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.080 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.06010.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.060 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.00710.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.007 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2010.01.00610.1016/j.mechrescom.2010.01.006 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.03610.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.036 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.03810.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.038 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.07310.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.073 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.13910.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.139 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.01.01010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.01.010 ↗
29. 10.1515/secm-2015-050910.1515/secm-2015-0509 ↗
30. 10.1007/s11029-008-9032-y10.1007/s11029-008-9032-y ↗
31. 10.1177/002199831559553210.1177/0021998315595532 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.06910.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.069 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.11.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.11.001 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.09710.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.097 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.06610.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.066 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.02410.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.024 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.04.00910.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.04.009 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.09210.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.092 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.021 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.04010.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.040 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.06.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2013.06.018 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.03.01310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.03.013 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.07.01210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.07.012 ↗
44. 10.1080/00218464.2013.76482910.1080/00218464.2013.764829 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.00710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.007 ↗
46. 3M Scotch‐Weld Epoxy Adhesives DP460 Off‐White and DP460NS Data Sheet (2017) (http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/66122O/3mtm‐scotch‐weld‐tm‐epoxy‐adhesive‐dp460‐ns‐and‐off‐white.pdf).
47. ASTM 5868:2014 Standard Test Method for Lap Shear Adhesion for Fiber Reinforced Plastic (FRP) Bonding.ASTM International.