journal article·2017-11

Effect of fiber chemical treatment of nonwoven coconut fiber/epoxy composites adhesion obtained by RTM process

Kelly C.C. de Carvalho Benini, Thatiane Brocks, Sérgio R. Montoro, Maria Odila Hilário Cioffi, Herman Jacobus Cornelis Voorwald

Polymer Composites· Volume 38· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

In this work untreated and alkali treated nonwoven coconut fiber mats/epoxy resin composites were manufactured using the resin transfer molding process. The alkaline solution removes some impurities present on fibers superficial layers and the effect regarding fiber/matrix adhesion were investigated by thermogravimetric analysis, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), ultrasonic C‐scan, and quasi‐static flexural test. Results show a removing of some amorphous fibers constituents, mainly waxes, extractives, and hemicellulose, revealing the fiber roughness surface but no initial degradation temperature changing. Regarding the composites, a similar interfacial adhesion was observed in both one through the results of SEM, DMA and quasi‐static flexural tests. The conclusion is that chemical treatment conditions applied on the fiber surface was been suitable to improve fiber roughness but did not the adhesion between coconut fibers mat and epoxy resin. POLYM. COMPOS., 38:2518–2527, 2017. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

UNESP, Univ. Estadual Paulista, Fatigue and Aeronautical Material Research Group, 333, Dr. Ariberto Pereira Da Cunha Ave. Guaratinguetá 12516‐410 Brazil

FATEC, Faculdade De Tecnologia, Rod. Vereador Abel Fabrício Dias, N° 4010 Pindamonhangaba 12445‐010 Brazil

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.03.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2010.03.005 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.10.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2010.10.007 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.09.00910.1016/j.carbpol.2011.09.009 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cej.2010.11.03910.1016/j.cej.2010.11.039 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.02.02010.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.02.020 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.01.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2008.01.008 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.10.02310.1016/j.carbpol.2011.10.023 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.05310.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.053 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.021 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.10.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2008.10.018 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.03.05710.1016/j.carbpol.2010.03.057 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.09.01210.1016/j.indcrop.2011.09.012 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.10.00510.1016/j.carbpol.2009.10.005 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.06110.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.061 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.12.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2007.12.001 ↗
16. 10.1002/pen.2132810.1002/pen.21328 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.01.09010.1016/j.msea.2006.01.090 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.03.01810.1016/j.apsusc.2013.03.018 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.03.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2015.03.016 ↗
20. 10.1590/S1516-1439201300500010710.1590/S1516-14392013005000107 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10570-014-0398-910.1007/s10570-014-0398-9 ↗
22. Carvalho K.C.C. · Bioresources · 2010 · 5 · 114310.15376/biores.5.2.1143-1155 ↗
23. 10.1590/0104-1428.172210.1590/0104-1428.1722 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10570-012-9684-610.1007/s10570-012-9684-6 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.03010.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.030 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10570-013-0126-x10.1007/s10570-013-0126-x ↗
27. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.10.01410.1016/j.indcrop.2012.10.014 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.01.05910.1016/j.carbpol.2010.01.059 ↗
29. 10.1590/S1516-1439201200500006210.1590/S1516-14392012005000062 ↗