Room‐temperature aging of Narmco 5208 carbon‐epoxy prepreg. Part II: Physical, mechanical, and nondestructive characterization
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Samples of Narmco Rigidite 5208/WC3000 carbon‐epoxy composite prepreg were exposed to ambient temperature (22°C) and 50 percent relative humidity for different periods up to 66 days. The aging has a significant effect on prepreg physical properties such as tack, volatiles content, and gel time. A set of 4‐ply laminates made from aged prepreg was subjected to tensile testing, ultrasonic inspection, and optothermal inspection. No relationship could be discerned between laminate properties and prepreg aging time. However, variations in panel homogeneity were observed, and these correlated with thermal diffusivity and tensile modulus measurements, but not with ultimate tensile strength or elongation. A set of 6‐ply laminates was used to measure compressive properties, interlaminar shear strength, and physical properties. These panels also showed variations in porosity, again unrelated to aging, but in addition, the fiber/resin ratio was observed to decrease with aging time. Both factors were found to affect mechanical properties. The implications concerning the importance of monitoring the aging by physicochemical methods are discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques · Fire effects on concrete materials · Material Selection and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.75010030310.1002/pc.750100303 ↗
2. Hinrichs R. · SAMPE J. · 1979 · 15 · 12
3. Sanjana Z. N. · Proc. Nat. SAMPE Symp. Exhib. · 1979 · 24 · 330
4. Scola D. A. · Proc. Nat. SAMPE Tech. Conf. · 1983 · 15 · 9
5. 10.1002/pc.75008040610.1002/pc.750080406 ↗
6. Thuen J. · Proc. Nat. SAMPE Symp. Exhib. · 1980 · 25 · 126
7. Kibler K. G. · Proc. Nat. SAMPE Tech. Conf. · 1981 · 13 · 189
8. Kibler K. G. · Proc. Nat. SAMPE Symp. · 1982 · 27 · 416
9. Scola D. A. · Proc. Nat. SAMPE Tech. Conf. · 1984 · 16 · 328
10. 10.1002/app.1981.07026072210.1002/app.1981.070260722 ↗
11. 10.1002/app.1982.07027113710.1002/app.1982.070271137 ↗
12. 10.1002/app.1983.07028012410.1002/app.1983.070280124 ↗
13. 10.1002/app.1989.07037010210.1002/app.1989.070370102 ↗
14. 10.1002/app.1989.07037042310.1002/app.1989.070370423 ↗
15. 10.1016/0021-9673(88)90013-110.1016/0021-9673(88)90013-1 ↗
16. 10.1366/000370288442908510.1366/0003702884429085 ↗
17. 10.1016/0040-6031(88)87222-810.1016/0040-6031(88)87222-8 ↗
18. C. K.Jen C.Néron C. J.Chung andJ.Bussière Proc. Intl. Conf. Analytical Testing Methodologies Design Adv. Materials(ATMAM '87) pp.247–260 Montreal Aug. 26–28 1987.
19. 10.1051/rphysap:0198200170402270010.1051/rphysap:01982001704022700 ↗
20. Trivedi K. S. · 1982
21. Siegel A. F. · 1988
22. Larsson F. · Proc. Nat. SAMPE Tech. Conf. · 1978 · 10 · 622
23. K. C.Cole D.Noël P.Cielo J.‐C.Krapez A.Chouliotis andK. C.Overbury Proc. Intl. Conf. Analytical Testing Methodologies Design Adv. Materials(ATMAM '87) pp.301–309 Montreal Aug. 26–28 1987.
24. Carpenter J. F. · Proc. Nat. SAMPE Symp. Exhib. · 1979 · 24 · 446
25. Borstell H. · Proc. Nat. SAMPE Symp. Exhib. · 1979 · 24 · 422
26. Miller A. G. · Proc. Nat. SAMPE Symp. Exhib. · 1979 · 24 · 1223
27. 10.1021/bk-1980-0132.ch02110.1021/bk-1980-0132.ch021 ↗
28. Roylance M. E. · Proc. Nat. SAMPE Symp. Exhib. · 1983 · 28 · 309
29. Martin G. C. · SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers · 1985 · 31 · 1098
30. Carlsson L. · Mater. Sci. Monographs · 1986 · 36 · 239