Double‐vacuum‐bag technology for volatile management in composite fabrication
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A nonautoclave vacuum bag process using atmospheric pressure alone that eliminates the need for external pressure supplied normally by an autoclave or a press is an attractive method for composite fabrication. This type of process does not require large capital expenditures for tooling and processing equipment. The traditional single‐vacuum‐bag (SVB) process is best suited for molding epoxy matrix‐based composites because of their superior flow and the absence of reaction byproducts or other volatiles. This is not the case for other classes of materials such as polyimides and phenolics. Polyimides and phenolics are cured by condensation reactions which generate water as a reaction byproduct. In addition, these materials are commonly synthesized as oligomers using solvents to facilitate processability. Volatiles (solvents and reaction byproducts) management therefore becomes a critical issue. SVB molding, without additional pressure, normally fails to yield void‐free quality composites for these classes of resin systems. A double‐vacuum‐bag (DVB) process for volatile management in composite fabrication using common molding equipment was designed and built at the NASA Langley Research Center. This experimental DVB process affords superior volatiles management compared with the traditional SVB process. Void‐free composites are consistently fabricated as measured by C‐scan and optical photomicroscopy for high‐performance polyimide and phenolic resins. POLYM. COMPOS., 2008. © 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Synthesis and properties of polymers · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Injection Molding Process and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/00219983960300010710.1177/002199839603000107 ↗
2. 10.1016/0032-3861(94)90650-510.1016/0032-3861(94)90650-5 ↗
3. 10.1088/0954-0083/13/4/30210.1088/0954-0083/13/4/302 ↗
4. P.A.MehrkamandR.Cochran 24th International SAMPE Technical Conference T1006‐T1016 October20–22(1992).
5. L.B.Buckley R.E.Trabocco andE.L.Rosenzweig Naval Air Warfare Center Warminster PA Report No. NADC‐83084–60 (1983).
6. Donnellan T.M. · Second DOD/NASA Composites Repair Technology Workshop · 1986 · 2 · 349
7. T.M.Donnellan E.L.Rosenzweig R.C.Cochran andM.F.DiBerardino Closed Proceedings of 33rd International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition Society of Advancement of Material and Process Engineering Covina CA (1988).
8. M.F.DiBerardino J.Dominguez andR.C.Cochran Closed Proceedings of 34th International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition Society of Advancement of Material and Process Engineering Covina CA 75(1989).
9. J.Dominguez M.F.DiBerardino T.D.Price andL.E.Radford Closed Proceedings of 22nd International SAMPE Technical Conference Society of Advancement of Material and Process Engineering Covina CA 31(1990).
10. P.A.Mehrkam M.F.DiBerardino R.C.Cochran andI.S.Lim Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on Structural Adhesive Bonding American Defense Preparedness Association 192 May4–7(1992).
11. P.A.Mehrkam R.Cochran andR.Trabocco 25th International SAMPE Technical Conference 212 October26–28(1993).
12. T.H.Hou R.J.Cane B.J.Jensen S.E.Lowther A.C.Chang andC.B.Kellen Proceedings of 49th SAMPE International Symposium and Exhibition Society of Advancement of Material and Process Engineering May16–24 Long Beach CA (2004).
13. 10.1177/073168440505827110.1177/0731684405058271 ↗
14. T.H.HouandB.J.Jensen Proceedings of 49th SAMPE International Symposium and Exhibition Society of Advancement of Material and Process Engineering May16–24 Long Beach CA (2004).