The effects of thermal history on the structure/property relationship in polyphenylenesulfide/carbon fiber composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The purpose of this investigation was to examine the effects of thermal history during cooling from the melt on the degree of crystallinity, morphology, and mechanical properties of polyphenylenesulfide (PPS)/carbon fiber composites. Three thermal treatments were employed in this tudy: isothermal crystallization from the melt at 140, 160, 180, 200, and 22O°C; quenching from 315°C and then annealing at 160 and 200°C; and nonisothermal crystallization from the melt at rates varying from 0.4°C/min to 38°C/s. The effect of varying the thermal history of the sample on the degree of crystallinity developed in the matrix polymer was determined using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The effect of thermal history on and the resulting matrix morphology was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The subsequent effects of the degree of crystallinity and the morphology on the mechanical behavior of the samples were monitored by transverse tensile tests and flexural tests. In all cases, the transverse tensile and flexural moduli increased as the amount of crystallinity in the samples increased. However, samples with greater amounts of crystallinity did not always yield higher transverse tensile or flexural strengths. Upon examination of the composite samples by electron miscroscopy, it was observed that large increases in the values of the transverse tensile and flexural strengths could be correlated with structural changes in the matrix.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.75011010910.1002/pc.750110109 ↗
2. 10.1021/ma00179a05510.1021/ma00179a055 ↗
3. J.KellyandD. G.Baird 36th Intt. SAMPE Symp. Proc. 1535(1991).
4. P. T.Curtis P.Davies.I. K.Partridge andJ. P.Sainty Proc. ICCM London 4401(1989).
5. 10.1016/0263-8223(90)90028-D10.1016/0263-8223(90)90028-D ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.75007030510.1002/pc.750070305 ↗
7. 10.1177/00219983870210110410.1177/002199838702101104 ↗
8. 10.1002/app.1987.07033021710.1002/app.1987.070330217 ↗
9. Vautey P. · SAMPE Quart. · 1990 · 21 · 23
10. 10.1016/0032-3861(88)90207-810.1016/0032-3861(88)90207-8 ↗
11. 10.1002/app.1976.07020092110.1002/app.1976.070200921 ↗
12. Mijovic J. · SAMPE Quart. · 1990 · 22 · 42
13. 10.1016/0010-4361(88)90705-710.1016/0010-4361(88)90705-7 ↗
14. 10.1016/0032-3861(88)90386-210.1016/0032-3861(88)90386-2 ↗
15. 10.1002/pc.75011050310.1002/pc.750110503 ↗
16. 10.1002/pen.76026220810.1002/pen.760262208 ↗
17. H.MarandandA.Prasad Macromolecules submitted.
18. 10.1002/app.1990.07039040510.1002/app.1990.070390405 ↗
19. 10.1016/0032-3861(86)90053-410.1016/0032-3861(86)90053-4 ↗
20. 10.1007/BF0238542110.1007/BF02385421 ↗
21. 10.1007/BF0113240610.1007/BF01132406 ↗
22. 10.1002/pen.76026090910.1002/pen.760260909 ↗
23. B. S.HsiaoandE. J. H.Chen ICCI‐II Proc. Cleveland 613(1990).
24. 10.1002/app.1987.07033021810.1002/app.1987.070330218 ↗
25. 10.1557/PROC-170-11710.1557/PROC-170-117 ↗