Tailoring the Flexural Performance of Additively Manufactured Carbon/Glass Fiber Hybrid Composites: Synergistic Optimization of Hybrid Ratio and Ply Stacking Sequence
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT The growing demand for lightweight, high‐performance composites in rail transit applications has driven the development of hybrid fiber‐reinforced materials with tunable flexural properties. This study investigated the synergistic effects of hybrid ratio and ply stacking sequence on the flexural performance of additively manufactured carbon/glass fiber‐reinforced polyamide‐6 composites. Eight laminate configurations were fabricated via multi‐material fused deposition modeling (FDM), with carbon fiber volume fractions ranging from 0 to 100 vol% and stacking architectures classified as symmetric, sandwich, or alternating. Quasi‐static three‐point bending tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D7264, with deformation fields captured by digital image correlation (DIC) and fracture mechanisms analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM). The results indicated that flexural strength and modulus exhibited a nonlinear decline with decreasing carbon fiber content, identifying a critical threshold at approximately 25 vol%, below which both properties deteriorated sharply (up to a 56.6% reduction in modulus), whereas increasing glass fiber content enhanced failure strain. At a 1:1 carbon/glass fiber ratio, carbon‐outer configurations (e.g., C4G8C4) achieved superior strength (233.40 MPa) and modulus (19.96 GPa), whereas glass‐outer designs (e.g., G4C8G4) enhanced failure strain by 87.5% (4.05%) through ductile damage. Alternating sequences (G2C2) achieved a balance of strength (182.08 MPa) and damage tolerance via progressive failure. These findings demonstrate that hybrid ratio governs strength‐toughness trade‐offs, while stacking sequence dictates failure modes, providing a framework for optimizing additively manufactured hybrid composites for structural applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Rail Transit Vehicle System Southwest Jiaotong University Chengdu China
TaiHang Laboratory Chengdu China
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10848210.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108482 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41467‐023‐40751‐710.1038/s41467‐023‐40751‐7 ↗
3. 10.11817/j.issn.1672‐7207.2018.11.00110.11817/j.issn.1672‐7207.2018.11.001 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00170‐022‐10398‐710.1007/s00170‐022‐10398‐7 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10792410.1016/j.compositesa.2024.107924 ↗
6. 10.19818/j.cnki.1671‐1637.2021.02.00910.19818/j.cnki.1671‐1637.2021.02.009 ↗
7. 10.7527/S1000‐6893.2020.2495710.7527/S1000‐6893.2020.24957 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.010 ↗
9. 10.16080/j.issn1671‐833x.2017.30.03410.16080/j.issn1671‐833x.2017.30.034 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10961810.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109618 ↗
11. 10.14416/j.asep.2022.07.00110.14416/j.asep.2022.07.001 ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.2644810.1002/pc.26448 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.10883110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.108831 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2025.10489410.1016/j.tafmec.2025.104894 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.10.00110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.10.001 ↗
16. T.Hayashi “On the Improvement of Mechanical Properties of Composites by Hybrid Composition ”inProceedings of the 8th International Reinforced Plastics Conference 1972 149–152.
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.05.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2013.05.003 ↗
18. 10.3390/ma1711497010.3390/ma17114970 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11113310.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111133 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.tws.2025.11289810.1016/j.tws.2025.112898 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.tws.2025.11289510.1016/j.tws.2025.112895 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.02110.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.021 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.07.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2011.07.003 ↗
24. 10.1016/S1359‐8368(01)00008‐410.1016/S1359‐8368(01)00008‐4 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.02310.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.023 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.04.03110.1016/j.compstruct.2009.04.031 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.01.05510.1016/j.apsusc.2006.01.055 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.04310.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.043 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.10808310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108083 ↗
30. 10.3389/fmats.2022.83728910.3389/fmats.2022.837289 ↗
31. 10.1002/pc.2849510.1002/pc.28495 ↗
32. 10.1002/pc.2821710.1002/pc.28217 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.10999710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.109997 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.11903410.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119034 ↗
35. 10.4236/ojcm.2016.6100310.4236/ojcm.2016.61003 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10184210.1016/j.addma.2020.101842 ↗
37. 10.1080/15376494.2023.228726510.1080/15376494.2023.2287265 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11362610.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113626 ↗
39. ASTM D7264/D7264M‐07 “Standard Test Method for Flexural Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials ” ASTM International West Conshohocken PA 2007 https://doi.org/10.1520/D7264_D7264M‐07.10.1520/D7264_D7264M ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.05610.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.056 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.07.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2016.07.001 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.02710.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.027 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.02310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.023 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10867110.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108671 ↗