journal article·2026-05-10

Influence of Spindle Speed on Drilling‐Induced Delamination and Hole Quality in 3D ‐Printed ONYX /Glass Fiber Composite Laminates: An Experimental and FEA Approach

Pankaj Kumar, Syed Shah Hussain, Manowar Hussain, Jay Prakash Srivastava, Sukumar Dhanapalan, R. Gobinath

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT This Paper quantifies how spindle speed governs delamination and hole quality when drilling additively manufactured ONYX/glass‐fiber laminates—an area underexplored relative to conventionally made composites. Drilling tests at 500, 800, 1250, and 1850 rpm with a constant feed of 0.05 mm/rev assessed delamination factor, circularity, roundness error, and surface roughness. Increasing spindle speed systematically lowered thrust force and delamination, yielding smoother, more accurate holes. An orthotropic FEA model in ANSYS with Hashin failure criteria reproduced the stress fields and damage initiation observed experimentally, showing strong agreement ( R 2 = 0.962). Scale‐calibrated SEM quantified damage modes (fiber pull‐out, matrix cracking, and interlaminar separation) and confirmed the reduced damage at higher speeds. A curve‐fitted predictive relation between spindle speed and delamination factor was established, providing a practical process‐selection tool. These results demonstrate that spindle speed is inversely related to delamination in 3D‐printed ONYX/glass‐fiber laminates and offer validated guidelines to improve machinability and structural reliability of additively manufactured components for aerospace, drone, and automotive applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering SR University Warangal India

ZF India Pvt Ltd Hyderabad India

Department of Production & Industrial Engineering BIT Sindri Dhanbad India

Department of Mechanical Engineering GITAM Hyderabad India

Department of Aerospace Engineering Chandigarh University Mohali India

Symbiosis Center for Research and Innovation, Symbiosis International University Pune India

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10749310.1016/j.measurement.2020.107493 ↗
2. 10.1080/10426914.2015.100471310.1080/10426914.2015.1004713 ↗
3. 10.1515/secm-2021-002710.1515/secm-2021-0027 ↗
4. 10.5937/fme2404573P10.5937/fme2404573P ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.2830510.1002/pc.28305 ↗
6. 10.1080/15440478.2025.246149310.1080/15440478.2025.2461493 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.04410.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.044 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.procir.2012.04.08410.1016/j.procir.2012.04.084 ↗
9. 10.3390/jcs811045910.3390/jcs8110459 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00127-910.1016/S0266-3538(97)00127-9 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.04710.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.047 ↗
12. 10.3390/polym1621301110.3390/polym16213011 ↗
13. 10.1080/15376494.2020.174596910.1080/15376494.2020.1745969 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.01.01710.1016/j.mechmat.2019.01.017 ↗
15. 10.3390/mi1501010610.3390/mi15010106 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.01.02810.1016/j.compositesa.2019.01.028 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.02.05510.1016/j.ceramint.2019.02.055 ↗
18. In‐Situ Temperature Monitoring During Rotary Ultrasonic‐Assisted Drilling of Fiber‐Reinforced Composites
19. 10.1007/978-981-16-3937-1_2310.1007/978-981-16-3937-1_23 ↗
20. 10.1177/002199831986024510.1177/0021998319860245 ↗
21. Study on the Characteristics of Napier Grass Fibre Reinforced Porcelain Filler Particulates Poly Lactic Acid Matrix Biocomposite
22. 10.1007/s00170‐024‐13967‐010.1007/s00170‐024‐13967‐0 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10973-024-13015-910.1007/s10973-024-13015-9 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.csite.2025.10600310.1016/j.csite.2025.106003 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.10409610.1016/j.rineng.2025.104096 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.08.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2012.08.003 ↗
27. 10.1080/10426914.2024.239036210.1080/10426914.2024.2390362 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11523210.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115232 ↗
29. 10.1177/002199831140108710.1177/0021998311401087 ↗
30. 10.3390/mi1407142710.3390/mi14071427 ↗
31. 10.1177/0021998324127103510.1177/00219983241271035 ↗
32. 10.1088/2053‐1591/ad280710.1088/2053‐1591/ad2807 ↗
33. 10.1007/s13399-023-05251-010.1007/s13399-023-05251-0 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.11506610.1016/j.measurement.2024.115066 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.06.00210.1016/j.tafmec.2018.06.002 ↗
36. 10.3390/ma910082810.3390/ma9100828 ↗
37. 10.1007/s00170-018-2241-110.1007/s00170-018-2241-1 ↗
38. 10.1007/s10443-016-9517-010.1007/s10443-016-9517-0 ↗
39. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab619810.1088/2053-1591/ab6198 ↗
40. Markforged “Onyx – Technical Datasheet ”Markforged Inc. Watertown MA USA 2022. (Contains Onyx tensile strength ≈36 MPa tensile modulus ≈1.4 GPa strain at break ≈58% flexural strength 81 MPa flexural modulus 2.9 GPa HDT 145°C density 1.18 g/cm3) Scribd.
41. Strategic 3D Solutions “Markforged Material Properties – Continuous Fibers Datasheet ”Strategic 3D Solutions Raleigh NC USA 2017. (Lists fiberglass CFF tensile strength 590 MPa tensile modulus 21 GPa tensile strain at break 3.8% flexural strength 210 MPa flexural modulus 22 GPa density ≈1.6 g/cm3) Strategic 3D Solutions.
42. 10.3390/ma1716414010.3390/ma17164140 ↗
43. 10.24840/2183‐6493_009‐003_00184510.24840/2183‐6493_009‐003_001845 ↗
44. 10.1177/095440541140477410.1177/0954405411404774 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10823810.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108238 ↗
46. 10.1007/s00170-017-0880-210.1007/s00170-017-0880-2 ↗
47. 10.1080/20550340.2016.118743410.1080/20550340.2016.1187434 ↗
48. 10.1002/pc.2709910.1002/pc.27099 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.007 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.04210.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.042 ↗
51. 10.1007/s00170-020-05310-010.1007/s00170-020-05310-0 ↗
52. 10.1080/10426914.2016.115103810.1080/10426914.2016.1151038 ↗
53. 10.1080/15440478.2018.155815810.1080/15440478.2018.1558158 ↗
54. 10.1177/0954406224123509010.1177/09544062241235090 ↗
55. 10.3390/polym1311188410.3390/polym13111884 ↗
56. 10.1007/s00170-020-06217-610.1007/s00170-020-06217-6 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.02.02410.1016/j.compositesa.2017.02.024 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.03610.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.036 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.02410.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.024 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11173710.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111737 ↗
61. 10.1007/s00170-019-03753-810.1007/s00170-019-03753-8 ↗
62. 10.3390/polym1211246110.3390/polym12112461 ↗
63. 10.1177/0021998321100928110.1177/00219983211009281 ↗
64. 10.1007/s00170‐018‐1810‐710.1007/s00170‐018‐1810‐7 ↗
65. 10.1590/1517‐7076‐rmat‐2024‐020110.1590/1517‐7076‐rmat‐2024‐0201 ↗