Degradation Mechanism and Predictive Model of GFRP Bar‐Concrete Interfacial Bonding Behavior Under Alkaline Conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study examined the degradation of GFRP bars and their bond behavior with concrete under alkaline conditions. Two specimen types were prepared: a damaged group preloaded to 25% of the ultimate bond load and an undamaged group. Both were exposed to alkaline environments via static immersion and wet‐dry cycling. Macroscopic mechanical properties and interfacial micro‐morphology were evaluated after 30, 90, 150 days of aging. Results show that after 150 days, compared to non‐immersed specimens, the tensile strength of GFRP bars decreased by 20.44%–25.76% in the undamaged group and by 28.17%–29.83% in the damaged group. Bond strength was most significantly influenced by immersion duration, decreasing by up to 62.67% and 44.3% for the damaged and undamaged groups, respectively, compared to non‐corroded specimens. Microscopic analysis revealed that prolonged immersion loosened the bar‐concrete interface, accelerating OH − penetration. This promoted resin matrix hydrolysis (N content decreased from 14.84% to 0%) and fiber damage (Si content increased from 1.81% to 21.10%), resulting in continuous bond deterioration. Based on the results, a bond strength prediction model was developed using a 16 mm bar diameter threshold; a time‐dependent bond strength model under natural exposure in an alkaline environment was developed using cumulative heat, and a single‐logarithmic model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Urban Construction Wuhan University of Science and Technology Wuhan China
Hubei Provincial Expressway Industrial Development Co., Ltd. Wuhan China
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.004 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.11.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2007.11.002 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.marstruc.2024.10367910.1016/j.marstruc.2024.103679 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.apor.2024.10395910.1016/j.apor.2024.103959 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.apor.2024.10426210.1016/j.apor.2024.104262 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.07.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2009.07.003 ↗
7. Saleh N. · 2019 · 139
8. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11885710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118857 ↗
9. 10.1680/macr.2005.57.7.37110.1680/macr.2005.57.7.371 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.2338810.1002/pc.23388 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.11576910.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115769 ↗
12. 10.1080/01694243.2020.185277710.1080/01694243.2020.1852777 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11983910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119839 ↗
14. Wang J. · 2024 · 105731
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11672110.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116721 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0343510.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03435 ↗
17. 10.1002/pc.2879910.1002/pc.28799 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2024.10048610.1016/j.jcomc.2024.100486 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12877910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128779 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.002 ↗
21. 10.1155/2017/515618910.1155/2017/5156189 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.05510.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.055 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.03.00810.1016/j.compositesb.2007.03.008 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14151210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141512 ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:3(203)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:3(203) ↗
26. Hassanzadeh A. M. · 2022 · 2173
27. American Concrete Institute “ACI 440.3R‐12 Guide Test Methods for Fiber‐Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites for Reinforcing or Strengthening Concrete Structures ”2012 14 [Standard].
28. CSA S806‐12 · 2012
29. GB/T 30022‐2013 “National Technical Committee for standardization of fiber reinforced plastics ”2013.
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.03810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.038 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.prostr.2018.11.00310.1016/j.prostr.2018.11.003 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.02210.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.022 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.11.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2007.11.002 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.03.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2007.03.005 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.03710.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.037 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.08.01510.1016/j.compstruct.2005.08.015 ↗
37. 10.1080/14658011.2016.124580710.1080/14658011.2016.1245807 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11177210.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111772 ↗
39. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990118)71:3<483::AID-APP15>3.0.CO;2-S10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990118)71:3<483::AID-APP15>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
40. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000016810.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000168 ↗
41. G.Dunshi “The Mechanism of Alkali Erosion and the Study of Alkali Resistance in Glass Fiber ”2007.
42. 10.1002/suco.20210060710.1002/suco.202100607 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.11961110.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119611 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13536410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135364 ↗
45. ACI (American Concrete Institute) “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete Reinforced With Glass Fiber‐Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) Bars. (ACI 440.11‐22) Farmington Hills MI ”2022.
46. JSCE (Japan Society of Civil Engineers) “Recommendation for Design and Construction of Concrete Structures Using Continuous Fiber Reinforcing Materials. Tokyo Japan ”1997.
47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.04.01110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.04.011 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.16910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.169 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13831810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138318 ↗
50. 10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00041-210.1016/S0950-0618(03)00041-2 ↗