Effect of Two Coatings on Impact Response and Compression After Impact Strength of Composite Laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Composite laminates are particularly vulnerable to low‐velocity impacts, which induce internal damage and lead to significant strength reduction. This study presented the first investigation into the application of Polyisocyanate Oxazolidone (POZD) coatings on composite to enhance impact resistance. The effectiveness of POZD and Polyurea (PUA) coatings was evaluated through a series of impact tests at three energy levels (17, 32.5, and 50 J), followed by compression‐after‐impact (CAI) assessments. Both coatings significantly reduced damage area and suppressed crack propagation compared to uncoated specimens. Notably, they prevented weak zone formation at impact sites under low‐energy impacts and maintained superior CAI strength across all energy levels. Under 50 J impact conditions, the CAI strength showed the most significant variation. Compared to uncoated CFRP, the CAI strength of PUA‐CFRP specimens increased by 7.78%, while that of POZD‐CFRP increased by 15.27%. POZD‐coated laminates demonstrated optimal performance, exhibiting the smallest damage area and highest CAI strength values, establishing POZD as the superior protective coating for impact‐prone composite structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control for Aerospace Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Nanjing China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.09310.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.093 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.11111910.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.111119 ↗
3. 10.1177/1464420724130954810.1177/14644207241309548 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.10531610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.105316 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11114810.1016/j.tws.2023.111148 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.11199110.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.111991 ↗
7. 10.1080/2374068X.2021.194529310.1080/2374068X.2021.1945293 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10799110.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107991 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.10257610.1016/j.rineng.2024.102576 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10581310.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105813 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10678410.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106784 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10662810.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106628 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.10892910.1016/j.compositesa.2025.108929 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.10872210.1016/j.compositesa.2025.108722 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10939510.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109395 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11568010.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115680 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10450110.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104501 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e2911310.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29113 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2025.10912710.1016/j.porgcoat.2025.109127 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.10744610.1016/j.istruc.2024.107446 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.istruc.2025.10940110.1016/j.istruc.2025.109401 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12774910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127749 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.10335710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103357 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.dt.2020.11.00910.1016/j.dt.2020.11.009 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13691510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136915 ↗
26. 10.3390/polym1703038510.3390/polym17030385 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.prostr.2020.10.12910.1016/j.prostr.2020.10.129 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11125810.1016/j.tws.2023.111258 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.10609010.1016/j.istruc.2024.106090 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14290810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142908 ↗
31. 10.1080/13588265.2022.211148710.1080/13588265.2022.2111487 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10985810.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109858 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.dt.2021.07.00510.1016/j.dt.2021.07.005 ↗
34. 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG‐1181710.1061/JSENDH.STENG‐11817 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11725310.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117253 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10665710.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106657 ↗
37. ASTM D7136/D7136M‐15 “Standard Test Method for Measuring the Damage Resistance of a Fiber‐Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite to a Drop‐Weight Impact Event ”ASTM International (2015).
38. ASTM D7137/D7137M‐15 “Standard Test Method for Compressive Residual Strength Properties of Damaged Polymer Matrix Composite Plates ”ASTM International (2015).