journal article·2026-04-10Open access

Thermo‐Mechanical Characterization of Phenolic Woven Composite Laminates for Use in Fire/Blast‐Prone Aircraft Baggage Structures

Kathir Vadivel Marimuthu, Shamsher Bahadur Singh, Banasri Roy, Sudhirkumar V. Barai

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper experimentally investigates the thermal and mechanical performance of woven phenolic laminates reinforced with carbon (PF‐CFRP), glass (PF‐GFRP), basalt (PF‐BFRP), and Kevlar (PF‐KFRP), aiming to evaluate their suitability for aircraft baggage structures under fire and blast loads. Phenolic resin cured under single‐stage high‐temperature conditions (PF100) demonstrated a superior glass transition temperature of 150.0°C, tensile modulus of 2.61 GPa, and tensile strength of 32.51 MPa. Thermogravimetric analysis revealed that PF‐CFRP retained 87.9% mass at 800°C under nitrogen, while PF‐BFRP retained the highest mass in air (79.1%), followed by PF‐GFRP (66.3%). PF‐KFRP exhibited poor thermal stability (47.7%), even lower than the neat resin (58.9%) under nitrogen. PF‐CFRP exhibited the highest modulus and strength, with 68.50 GPa and 776.78 MPa, respectively, and an in‐plane shear strength of 110.46 MPa. PF‐BFRP showed the highest flexural strength of 362.93 MPa, excellent tensile strength of 587.63 MPa, and improved bending failure strain of 2.25%. PF‐GFRP exhibited moderate mechanical performance, with tensile and flexural strengths of 224.11 MPa and 292.59 MPa, respectively, with consistent shear performance. PF‐KFRP exhibited the highest failure strain (2.76% in tension), but weak interfacial bonding. Scanning electron microscopy revealed distinctive failure modes, including fiber breakage, pull‐out, delamination, and matrix cracking. Radar plots were used for comparative visualization, identifying PF‐BFRP as optimal for blast/fire resilience and PF‐CFRP for stiffness‐critical zones. Overall, the study highlights the potential of basalt‐phenolic composites and recommends functionally graded hybrid composites as next‐generation materials for aircraft baggage structures under combined mechanical and thermal conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Flame retardant materials and properties · Fire dynamics and safety research · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering BITS Pilani, Rajasthan India

Department of Chemical Engineering BITS Pilani, Rajasthan India

Funding

Defence Research and Development Organisation

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/B978-0-12-816564-5.00009-810.1016/B978-0-12-816564-5.00009-8 ↗
2. Heimbs S. · 2006 · 1
3. Pein M. · 2007 · 375
4. Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau “Final Report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau Concerning the Incident to the Airplane Mc Donald Douglas MD 83 ”2000.
5. J. F.Marcy E. B.Nicholas andJ. E.Dimaree “Fire Smoke and Toxic Gas Hazards in Airplane Passenger Cabin ”1965.
6. T.Marker “Initial Development of an Exploding Aerosol Can Simulator Federal Aviation Administration ”1998.
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.03810.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.038 ↗
8. H.Webster T.Maloney S. M.Summer D.Dadia S. J.Rehn andM.Karp “Summary of FAA Studies Related to the Hazards Produced by Lithium Cells in Thermal Runaway in Aircraft Cargo Compartments ”2016.
9. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) “Fire Protection: 25.853 Compartment Interiors ”Code of Federal Regulations.2025 https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title‐14/chapter‐I/subchapter‐C/part‐25/subpart‐D/subject‐group‐ECFR1e1f52030ba4797/section‐25.853.
10. European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) “Fire Protection: CS 25.855 Cargo or Baggage Compartments ”2023Easy Access Rules for Large Aeroplanes (CS‐25) https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/document‐library/easy‐access‐rules/online‐publications/easy‐access‐rules‐large‐aeroplanes‐cs‐25?page=30#_Toc256000210.
11. European Union Aviation Safety Agency “Annual Safety Review 2023 ”2023 https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2822/83672.
12. International Air Transport Association “IATA Annual Review 2024 ”2024.
13. 10.1007/s35784‐018‐0006‐810.1007/s35784‐018‐0006‐8 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.07510.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.075 ↗
15. National Research Council · 1999 · 22
16. National Research Council · 1999 · 28
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.06.01410.1016/j.compstruct.2011.06.014 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.10000410.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100004 ↗
19. 10.1007/978-94-015-9091-4_310.1007/978-94-015-9091-4_3 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10443‐005‐1125‐310.1007/s10443‐005‐1125‐3 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.27410.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.274 ↗
22. 10.52547/jcc.3.4.610.52547/jcc.3.4.6 ↗
23. 10.1557/mrs.2015.27810.1557/mrs.2015.278 ↗
24. Kaufman J. G. · 2016 · 1
25. 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.07.02710.1016/j.istruc.2023.07.027 ↗
26. 10.1155/2006/54706310.1155/2006/547063 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0034‐3617(07)70383‐110.1016/S0034‐3617(07)70383‐1 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2020.10064410.1016/j.paerosci.2020.100644 ↗
29. 10.1016/S1359‐835X(03)00060‐510.1016/S1359‐835X(03)00060‐5 ↗
30. O.Nixon‐Pearson P.Greaves D.Mamalis andL.Stevenson “WP4 – D1.1. Wind Turbine Blades Design and Manufacturing Current State‐of‐the‐Art Literature Review ”2022.
31. Development of Advanced Vacuum‐Assisted Resin Transfer Molding Technology for Use in an MRJ Empennage Box Structure
32. 10.1007/s00170‐024‐13241‐310.1007/s00170‐024‐13241‐3 ↗
33. 10.1617/s11527‐023‐02211‐y10.1617/s11527‐023‐02211‐y ↗
34. Mouritz A. P. · 2006 · 133
35. 10.1038/s41598‐023‐40351‐x10.1038/s41598‐023‐40351‐x ↗
36. 10.3390/en1804081910.3390/en18040819 ↗
37. 10.1002/pc.2703210.1002/pc.27032 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0384810.1021/acsomega.2c03848 ↗
39. 10.1080/14658011.2017.138517710.1080/14658011.2017.1385177 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2024.10844210.1016/j.polymertesting.2024.108442 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ast.2017.02.01110.1016/j.ast.2017.02.011 ↗
42. 10.3390/ma1610371710.3390/ma16103717 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e3293910.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32939 ↗
44. 10.3390/polym1501005110.3390/polym15010051 ↗
45. I.Roese‐Koerner F.Martaus G.Mirra J.Bachmann andM.Liebisch “New Materials for Fire Protection in Cabin Environment—Test Results Second Batch ”Mitigating Risks of Fire Smoke and Fumes.2018;(2).
46. 10.1002/pc.2941610.1002/pc.29416 ↗
47. 10.1007/s10694‐019‐00928‐310.1007/s10694‐019‐00928‐3 ↗
48. 10.3390/polym1101013510.3390/polym11010135 ↗
49. 10.3390/polym1414289010.3390/polym14142890 ↗
50. 10.1177/004051752091823210.1177/0040517520918232 ↗
51. 10.3390/jcs810041510.3390/jcs8100415 ↗
52. 10.3139/217.204610.3139/217.2046 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.03410.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.034 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.002 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.01.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2015.01.006 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.08.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2017.08.014 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12798310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127983 ↗
58. 10.3390/min1006049010.3390/min10060490 ↗
59. 10.1080/15440478.2019.169111410.1080/15440478.2019.1691114 ↗
60. 10.1007/s11595‐013‐0731‐410.1007/s11595‐013‐0731‐4 ↗
61. F.Bauer M.Kempf C.Wellhausen andP.Middendorf “Application Potential of Basalt Fibers in Aeronautics ”In: ECCM17 ‐ 17th European Conference on Composite Materials2016.
62. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.02810.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.028 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.03.09010.1016/j.msea.2016.03.090 ↗
64. 10.1002/pc.2854010.1002/pc.28540 ↗
65. 10.1002/pc.2770910.1002/pc.27709 ↗
66. 10.1007/s11665‐024‐10198‐y10.1007/s11665‐024‐10198‐y ↗
67. Marimuthu K. V. · 2025 · 28510.1007/978-981-96-0751-8_21 ↗
68. ASTM International “ASTM Designation E1356–23: Standard Test Method for Assignment of the Glass Transition Temperatures by Differential Scanning Calorimetry ”In: ASTM Volume 14.01: Quality and Statistics; Hazard Potential of Chemicals; Thermal Measurements; Manufacture of Pharmaceutical and Biopharmaceutical Products; Healthcare Informatics. Vol 14.01.2023 https://doi.org/10.1520/E1356‐23.10.1520/E1356 ↗
69. ASTM International “ASTM Designation E1131–08: Standard Test Method for Compositional Analysis by Thermogravimetry ”In: ASTM Volume 14.01: Quality And Statistics; Hazard Potential of Chemicals; Thermal Measurements; Manufacture of Pharmaceutical and Biopharmaceutical Products; Healthcare Informatics. Vol 14.01.2008 https://doi.org/10.1520/E1131‐20.10.1520/E1131 ↗
70. ASTM International “ASTM Designation D638‐22: Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastic ”In: ASTM Volume 08.01: Plastics (I): C1147–D3159. Vol 08.012022 https://doi.org/10.1520/D0638‐22.10.1520/D0638 ↗
71. ASTM International “ASTM Designation D3039/D3039M−17: Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials ”In: ASTM Volume 15.03: Space Simulation; Aerospace and Aircraft; Composite Materials. Vol 15.03.2017 https://doi.org/10.1520/D3039_D3039M‐17.10.1520/D3039_D3039M ↗
72. ASTM International “ASTM Designation D3518/D3518M‐18: Standard Test Method for In‐Plane Shear Response of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials by Tensile Test of a ±45° Laminate ”In: ASTM Volume 15.03: Space Simulation; Aerospace and Aircraft; Composite Materials. Vol 15.03.2018 https://doi.org/10.1520/D3518_D3518M‐18.10.1520/D3518_D3518M ↗
73. ASTM International “ASTM Designation D3410/D3410M−16: Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials With Unsupported Gage Section by Shear Loading ”In: ASTM Volume 15.03: Space Simulation; Aerospace and Aircraft; Composite Materials. Vol 15.032016 https://doi.org/10.1520/D3410_D3410M‐16E01.10.1520/D3410_D3410M ↗
74. ASTM International “ASTM Designation D790‐17: Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials ”In: ASTM Volume 08.01: Plastics (I): C1147–D3159. Vol 08.01.;2017 https://doi.org/10.1520/D0790‐17.10.1520/D0790 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.11.01610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.11.016 ↗
76. 10.1080/00218464.2013.77955910.1080/00218464.2013.779559 ↗
77. 10.1021/ma801155c10.1021/ma801155c ↗
78. 10.1002/pc.2375210.1002/pc.23752 ↗
79. 10.1016/S0141‐3910(01)00157‐410.1016/S0141‐3910(01)00157‐4 ↗
80. 10.1007/s10443‐019‐09762‐w10.1007/s10443‐019‐09762‐w ↗
81. 10.3390/polym1323407010.3390/polym13234070 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.03.04510.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.03.045 ↗
83. 10.1007/978-3-662-02429-4_810.1007/978-3-662-02429-4_8 ↗
84. 10.1177/09673911030110050110.1177/096739110301100501 ↗
85. 10.1088/2053‐1591/ac3aa610.1088/2053‐1591/ac3aa6 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.009 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.jaap.2023.10598510.1016/j.jaap.2023.105985 ↗
88. 10.1021/cm00047a00610.1021/cm00047a006 ↗
89. 10.1007/s10973‐010‐0930‐610.1007/s10973‐010‐0930‐6 ↗
90. 10.1007/s10973‐022‐11799‐210.1007/s10973‐022‐11799‐2 ↗
91. Daniel I. M. · 2006
92. 10.1007/BF0054175010.1007/BF00541750 ↗
93. 10.1016/0961‐9526(95)00100‐210.1016/0961‐9526(95)00100‐2 ↗
94. 10.3390/jcs403010110.3390/jcs4030101 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.58610.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.586 ↗
96. 10.1016/0010‐4361(93)90271‐910.1016/0010‐4361(93)90271‐9 ↗
97. 10.2109/jcersj.100.103810.2109/jcersj.100.1038 ↗
98. 10.1007/s42765‐022‐00204‐010.1007/s42765‐022‐00204‐0 ↗
99. 10.1039/C2JM16602J10.1039/C2JM16602J ↗
100. 10.4271/2016‐01‐211910.4271/2016‐01‐2119 ↗