journal article·2026-02-20

Flexural Response of Phenolic Composites Reinforced With Discontinuous Glass Fibers Under Varying Temperatures and Loading Rates

Zhuping Wu, Yudong Xu, Yingtao Zhan, Tianxiang Ren, Haihua Zhan, Kun Zhang, Lifeng Chen, Wei Shen, Yiwei Ouyang, Defang Zhao, Zongzi Hou, Wei Wang

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT The time–temperature superposition principle (TTSP) is generally applicable to long‐term mechanical behavior within the linear viscoelastic region. However, its validity for predicting long‐term durability of polymer deformations in the nonlinear viscoelastic region remains scarcely reported. Due to this limitation in application, this paper investigates the application of TTSP for long‐term mechanical performance in the nonlinear viscoelastic region. In this study, discontinuous glass fiber‐reinforced phenolic composites were prepared via injection molding. The composites were subsequently characterized through three‐point bending experiments, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to investigate flexural response for materials at varying temperatures and loading rates (time), as well as the influence on dynamic mechanical properties. The TTSP was applied to construct storage modulus master curves for predicting the material's long‐term performance. Finally, the application of TTSP to static flexural modulus was discussed. The experimental data showed that loading rates and temperatures significantly affect the dynamic mechanical properties and static flexural properties for phenolic resin and glass fiber (GF)/phenolic composites. Specimens exhibited increased flexural strength and flexural modulus with increasing flexural strain rate but decreased with increasing temperature. The storage modulus versus temperature and frequency exhibited a similar trend, all conforming to the TTSP. Moreover, the storage modulus master curves indicated that the durability of GF/phenolic composites was fundamentally determined by the phenolic resin matrix, but the addition of GF enhanced the durability. Even after aging for 190.3 years, the durability was still improved by 2.6%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Tribology and Wear Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Clean Dyeing and Finishing Technology of Zhejiang Province; Zhejiang Sub‐Center of National Carbon Fiber Engineering Technology Research Center; Shaoxing Sub‐Center of National Engineering Research Center for Fiber‐Based Composites; Shaoxing Key Laboratory of High Performance Fibers & Products; School of Textile Science and Engineering Shaoxing University Shaoxing China

Modern Textile Technology Innovation Center (Jianhu Laboratory) Shaoxing China

CTA High‐Tech Fiber Co., Ltd Shaoxing China

Shaoxing Baojing Composite Materials Co., Ltd Shaoxing China

School of Textile Science and Engineering Wuhan Textile University Wuhan China

School of Materials Science and Engineering Zhejiang University Hangzhou China

College of Textile Science and Engineering (International Institute of Silk), Zhejiang Sci‐Tech University Hangzhou China

State Key Laboratory of Bio‐Based Fiber Materials China Textile Academy Beijing China

College of Textile and Garment Dezhou University Dezhou China

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.008 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.1042010.1002/pc.10420 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.05710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.057 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00177-510.1016/S0263-8223(01)00177-5 ↗
5. 10.1002/fam.81018050710.1002/fam.810180507 ↗
6. Phenolic GRP and Its Recent Applications
7. Fire Performance of Composite Panels for Large Marine Structures
8. 10.1002/app.2944410.1002/app.29444 ↗
9. 10.1007/978-3-642-04714-510.1007/978-3-642-04714-5 ↗
10. A Hot‐Melt Thermosetting Phenolic Prepreg and Its Composites
11. 10.1021/ed079p94210.1021/ed079p942 ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.1007310.1002/pc.10073 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.03010.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.030 ↗
14. 10.1002/047174183310.1002/0471741833 ↗
15. Ferry J. D. · 1980
16. 10.1007/s10443-006-9017-810.1007/s10443-006-9017-8 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.03010.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.030 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.03810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.038 ↗
19. 10.1080/14658011.2020.173686710.1080/14658011.2020.1736867 ↗
20. 10.1177/0892705721105177310.1177/08927057211051773 ↗
21. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19971107)66:6<1101::AID-APP11>3.0.CO;2-410.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19971107)66:6<1101::AID-APP11>3.0.CO;2-4 ↗
22. 10.1002/978111996712510.1002/9781119967125 ↗
23. Menczel J. D. · 2008
24. 10.3390/polym710149310.3390/polym7101493 ↗
25. 10.1080/09243046.2013.77799610.1080/09243046.2013.777996 ↗
26. 10.1021/ja01619a00810.1021/ja01619a008 ↗
27. 10.1002/app.2164810.1002/app.21648 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.012 ↗
29. 10.1177/002199831771463810.1177/0021998317714638 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.12.00310.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.12.003 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.11.02510.1016/j.wasman.2018.11.025 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.08.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2007.08.009 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.03510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.035 ↗
34. 10.7569/JRM.2015.63411110.7569/JRM.2015.634111 ↗
35. 10.1007/s12221-021-0449-410.1007/s12221-021-0449-4 ↗