On the Interlaminar Properties of ENF Specimens of Glass/Epoxy Composites Incorporated Novel Hybrid Electrospun Interlayers
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study investigates a novel approach that employs natural and organic materials to design electrospun interlayers, intending to enhance the mode II interlaminar fracture toughness (ILFT) of glass/epoxy composites. To this end, seven types of interlayers were manufactured using various weight percentages of two types of nanoparticles combined with water‐soluble PVA nanofibers. These nanoparticles are green composite nanoparticles, which are synthesized using lemon juice and consist of a SiO 2 core and an Mg(OH) 2 shell, and natural cork nanoparticles. Experimental investigations have demonstrated that incorporating these interlayers significantly enhances the load‐bearing capacity and improves delamination resistance, as evidenced by the R‐Curve analysis. Notably, PVA interlayers hybridized with 0.25 wt% cork and 0.75 wt% SiO 2 /Mg(OH) 2 nanoparticles resulted in remarkable increases of 201 and 122% in propagation ILFT compared to specimens without interlayers, respectively. Also, among these specimens, the PVA‐Cork‐0.25% interlayers demonstrated a 110% increase in initiation ILFT of glass/epoxy composites, along with a large‐scale fracture process zone (FPZ). Microscopy analysis of the specimen edges revealed a positive correlation between the jagged crack profile and the propagation ILFT value. Furthermore, SEM analysis of the fracture surfaces of specimens with interlayers identified fiber/nanofiber breakage as the primary mechanism observed in these specimens.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Arak University of Technology Arak Iran
Department of Science Arak University of Technology Arak Iran
References (73)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.10319510.1016/j.rineng.2024.103195 ↗
2. Sridharan S. · 2008
3. Gürdal Z. · 1999
4. 10.3390/jcs711046810.3390/jcs7110468 ↗
5. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102679-3.00004-610.1016/B978-0-08-102679-3.00004-6 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.coco.2025.10225310.1016/j.coco.2025.102253 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.coco.2024.10219810.1016/j.coco.2024.102198 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2947310.1002/pc.29473 ↗
9. 10.1533/9781845694821.1.310.1533/9781845694821.1.3 ↗
10. 10.1533/9781845694821.1.2810.1533/9781845694821.1.28 ↗
11. Investigation of Interlayering Effect on the Mechanical Properties and Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Laminated Composites: A Review
12. 10.1002/pc.2944710.1002/pc.29447 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.002 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2023.10409310.1016/j.tafmec.2023.104093 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.11.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2017.11.016 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11814210.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118142 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.08.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2007.08.016 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.06.02910.1016/j.compositesa.2004.06.029 ↗
19. 10.1007/s40430‐021‐03220‐010.1007/s40430‐021‐03220‐0 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.coco.2019.11.00310.1016/j.coco.2019.11.003 ↗
21. 10.1177/00219983970310130310.1177/002199839703101303 ↗
22. 10.1520/CTR10010J10.1520/CTR10010J ↗
23. 10.1163/156855112X62621910.1163/156855112X626219 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.11080610.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.110806 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0266‐3538(98)00018‐910.1016/S0266‐3538(98)00018‐9 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10699210.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106992 ↗
27. 10.1016/B978-1-78242-279-2.00010-X10.1016/B978-1-78242-279-2.00010-X ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.10083010.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100830 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.10399710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.103997 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.03.02710.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.03.027 ↗
31. 10.1007/s12221‐023‐00466‐410.1007/s12221‐023‐00466‐4 ↗
32. 10.1002/pc.2237510.1002/pc.22375 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.diamond.2024.11141310.1016/j.diamond.2024.111413 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.10252310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102523 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11721410.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117214 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11061210.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110612 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.coco.2024.10205110.1016/j.coco.2024.102051 ↗
38. 10.3390/polym1508191610.3390/polym15081916 ↗
39. 10.1002/pc.2281310.1002/pc.22813 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.04.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.04.002 ↗
41. ASTM D7905 “Standard Test Method for Determination of the Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber‐Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites ”2019 18 https://doi.org/10.1520/D7905_D7905M‐14 D7905/D7905M‐14 A.10.1520/D7905_D7905M ↗
42. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.06410.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.064 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.00410.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.004 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10904210.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.109042 ↗
45. 10.3390/jcs812048910.3390/jcs8120489 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10594310.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105943 ↗
47. Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Interface Fiber Angle on the Fracture Toughness of Woven Laminated Composites Under Mode II Loading
48. 10.1002/app.5267110.1002/app.52671 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.004 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10990010.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109900 ↗
51. 10.1177/00219983000340040210.1177/002199830003400402 ↗
52. 10.3390/polym1102030610.3390/polym11020306 ↗
53. 10.1007/BF0272015810.1007/BF02720158 ↗
54. 10.3390/molecules2713417710.3390/molecules27134177 ↗
55. Investigating the Mode II Critical Strain Energy Release Rate of Glass/Epoxy Laminated Composites Reinforced With Polyvinyl Alcohol Interlayer
56. 10.1002/pc.2833710.1002/pc.28337 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.matdes.2024.11305910.1016/j.matdes.2024.113059 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.04.01610.1016/j.jiec.2016.04.016 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.10110.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.101 ↗
60. 10.1080/03602559.2017.128068310.1080/03602559.2017.1280683 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.03410.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.034 ↗
62. 10.3390/ma1410269510.3390/ma14102695 ↗
63. 10.1002/pc.2863710.1002/pc.28637 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.10.01310.1016/j.compscitech.2013.10.013 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.03910.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.039 ↗
66. 10.1002/pc.2036710.1002/pc.20367 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.12.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2016.12.017 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.016 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.coco.2021.10089810.1016/j.coco.2021.100898 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.07.01110.1016/j.carbon.2012.07.011 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.10062210.1016/j.coco.2020.100622 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10774410.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107744 ↗
73. 10.1002/pc.2849810.1002/pc.28498 ↗