journal article·2025-09-10Open access

Effect of Synergistic Compatibilizers for Surface Problem Solution of Cow Bone Powder and Hydroxyapatite Filled Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Composites

Sedef Şişmanoğlu, Abdulbaset Miftah Mohamed Sager, Mehmet Yurderi, Ümit Tayfun, Yasin Kanbur

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 13

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aimed to improve the properties of polybutylene succinate (PBS) based composites by using different inorganic reinforcement materials such as cow bone powder (BP) and hydroxyapatite (HAP). Three different compatibilizers, namely thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) and maleic‐grafted‐polypropylene (MA‐g‐PP), were used to solve the surface incompatibility problems between the polymer matrix and the fillers. XRD, XRF, SEM, and FTIR spectroscopy methods were used to characterize the surface functionalities of BP and HAP powders and to elucidate their morphological properties and chemical structures. Composites containing pure PBS, 30% filler by weight, and 5% compatibilizer were mixed in a twin‐screw extruder. The resulting composite materials were shaped into dog bones by injection molding. Characterization of the composites was carried out by tensile tests, hardness, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), reciprocating wear tests, water absorption, and field effect scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). According to the results, the use of TPU as a compatibilizer positively affects the mechanical, wear, water absorption, and thermal properties of both BP and HAP filled composite materials. It was observed that MA‐g‐PP used as a compatibilizer negatively affects the thermal properties of the composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science Karabuk University Karabuk Turkey

Department of Electronics and Automation, Bartın Vocational School Bartın University Bartın Turkey

Basic Sciences Bartin University Bartın Turkey

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10606610.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106066 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.011 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10932610.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109326 ↗
4. 10.1007/978-3-642-03287-5_1410.1007/978-3-642-03287-5_14 ↗
5. S.Sismanoglu “Termoplastik Poliüretan Matrisli Ekokompozitlerin Hazırlanması ve Karakterizasyonu” (PhD. KarabüK Üniversitesi 2020).
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10925110.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109251 ↗
7. 10.1007/s00289‐014‐1183‐510.1007/s00289‐014‐1183‐5 ↗
8. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.93-94.45110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.93-94.451 ↗
9. 10.2495/DN10018110.2495/DN100181 ↗
10. 10.3390/polym1404084410.3390/polym14040844 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2022.10157910.1016/j.progpolymsci.2022.101579 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.supflu.2024.10643010.1016/j.supflu.2024.106430 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2024.10611210.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2024.106112 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2025.11103910.1016/j.compscitech.2025.111039 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.13979310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.139793 ↗
16. 10.3390/polym1702019410.3390/polym17020194 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2025.11118510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2025.111185 ↗
18. 10.3390/ma1802029310.3390/ma18020293 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jece.2024.11503310.1016/j.jece.2024.115033 ↗
20. Ying Kei C. L. · 2019
21. Khalid H. · 2019
22. Animal Bone‐A Brief Introduction
23. 10.21733/ibad.37382610.21733/ibad.373826 ↗
24. Farkli Mineral Yapiya Sahip Kalsiyum Fosfat Tozlarinin Sinterlenme Özelliklerinin Karşilaştirilmasi
25. 10.1177/089270571989090410.1177/0892705719890904 ↗
26. 10.1007/s13399‐021‐01987‐910.1007/s13399‐021‐01987‐9 ↗
27. 10.1002/pc.2770710.1002/pc.27707 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10970810.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109708 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.11128910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111289 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.03110.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.031 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.07.02010.1016/j.indcrop.2017.07.020 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.01310.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.013 ↗
33. 10.3390/polym1502026110.3390/polym15020261 ↗
34. 10.1007/s12034-015-1047-010.1007/s12034-015-1047-0 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.12.16110.1016/j.ceramint.2018.12.161 ↗
36. 10.3390/molecules2619592710.3390/molecules26195927 ↗
37. S.Filizgök “Poli(Bütilen Süksinat) Nanokompozitlerinin Kristalizasyon Kinetiğinin Incelenmesi” (PhD. Kocaeli University Institute of Science 2017).
38. 10.3390/pr1303080910.3390/pr13030809 ↗
39. W.DaiandN. L.Denton “Hardness Comparison of Polymer Specimens Produced With Different Processes ”(2018) https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/aseeil‐insectionconference/2018/tech/3.
40. 10.1155/2020/169017810.1155/2020/1690178 ↗
41. 10.24011/barofd.30621510.24011/barofd.306215 ↗
42. 10.1177/089270571142180610.1177/0892705711421806 ↗
43. 10.1117/12.92895910.1117/12.928959 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.11.07610.1016/j.matpr.2018.11.076 ↗
45. 10.1177/002199830935921210.1177/0021998309359212 ↗
46. E.Çevik “Polilaktik Asit Esasli Kenevir Elyaf Takviyeli Biyo‐Kompozitlerin Farkli Modifikasyon Yöntemleri Ile Üretimi Ve Karakterizasyonu” (PhD. Karabük University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences 2023).