Electromagnetic Shielding With CFRP Composites: Conducting Matrix Versus Conducting Fibers
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites are widely used in the aerospace industry. In order to render them opaque to incoming electromagnetic radiation, the current practice is to attach a thin woven or nonwoven metallic mesh with a suitable adhesive resin to the laminates. If the metal mesh is to be eliminated altogether, there are two competing strategies that can help increase the shielding effectiveness of CFRP laminates. Firstly, the isotropic electrical conductivity of the matrix can be improved by either adding conducting fillers or changing the matrix to one that is more conductive than epoxy. Secondly, the anisotropic conductivity of the individual carbon fibers or the carbon fabric can be improved. We conduct transfer matrix method (TMM) based simulations, considering a composite laminate to be an assemblage of anisotropic unidirectional fiber reinforced thin plies, with a view to assess the viability of these two strategies. Our results show that trying to enhance the longitudinal conductivity of the fibers is, by far, the more rewarding strategy. Finally, we conduct experiments on composites with carbon nanotubes dispersed in the epoxy matrix, and fibers with grafted nanotubes to reinforce the point. Using uni‐directional carbon fibers grafted with carbon nanotubes, the total shielding effectiveness in the direction perpendicular to the fibers increased from to and that along the fibers increased from to .
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Kanpur Uttar Pradesh India
Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Kanpur Uttar Pradesh India
Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Ropar Rupnagar Punjab India
Funding
Indian Space Research Organisation
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.75004010710.1002/pc.750040107 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.07.00210.1016/j.paerosci.2013.07.002 ↗
3. 10.5028/jatm.v11.102210.5028/jatm.v11.1022 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10867510.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108675 ↗
5. 10.1109/TEMC.2018.284567110.1109/TEMC.2018.2845671 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0008‐6223(00)00184‐610.1016/S0008‐6223(00)00184‐6 ↗
7. 10.3390/polym1423522410.3390/polym14235224 ↗
8. 10.1109/TIM.2023.332550910.1109/TIM.2023.3325509 ↗
9. 10.1109/TEMC.2008.92681810.1109/TEMC.2008.926818 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11532610.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115326 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0165610.1021/acsomega.3c01656 ↗
12. 10.1016/0010‐4361(94)90019‐110.1016/0010‐4361(94)90019‐1 ↗
13. 10.1109/15.17928110.1109/15.179281 ↗
14. 10.1016/s1359‐8368(98)00065‐110.1016/s1359‐8368(98)00065‐1 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10927110.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109271 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.11008110.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110081 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.12.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.12.008 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2022.11718310.1016/j.synthmet.2022.117183 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.08.08010.1016/j.carbon.2022.08.080 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2408410.1002/pc.24084 ↗
21. 10.1039/d1tc01099a10.1039/d1tc01099a ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.2847210.1002/pc.28472 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15444510.1016/j.cej.2024.154445 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11086810.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110868 ↗
25. 10.3390/ma1408190710.3390/ma14081907 ↗
26. 10.2528/PIERB1108310710.2528/PIERB11083107 ↗
27. R.Rumph “Computational Electromagnetics ”(2019) https://empossible.net/academics/emp5337/.
28. 10.1063/1.172857910.1063/1.1728579 ↗
29. 10.1049/PBEW047E10.1049/PBEW047E ↗
30. 10.1109/36.84302310.1109/36.843023 ↗
31. 10.1364/AO.37.00527110.1364/AO.37.005271 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.03.03210.1016/j.carbon.2011.03.032 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10973410.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109734 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.10.01410.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.10.014 ↗
35. 10.3221/IGF‐ESIS.48.5510.3221/IGF‐ESIS.48.55 ↗
36. 10.1002/pc.2471410.1002/pc.24714 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.05910.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.059 ↗
38. 10.1002/pc.3000310.1002/pc.30003 ↗
39. 10.1109/TDEI.2025.356253610.1109/TDEI.2025.3562536 ↗
40. 10.1109/TNANO.2024.352341210.1109/TNANO.2024.3523412 ↗
41. M. K.Srivastava H.Gupta A.Yesu et al. “Comparing CNT Based CFRP Modification Strategies: Resin Reinforcement Versus Grafting on Carbon Fiber ”(2025) Submitted manuscript.