journal article·2025-11-10

Predicting the Strength of Additively Manufactured Polymeric Nanocomposites Based on the Filament Properties

Roham Rafiee, Hirad Amohaji

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT The production of nanocomposite parts through the additive manufacturing process has become popular due to its precision in creating complex geometries. This study focuses on predicting the tensile strength of 3D‐printed nanocomposites with varying print orientations. Filament properties, interlayer adhesion, and porosity serve as model inputs. Finite element modeling shows that interlayer adhesion and raster path have very little effect on the strength of the part in the longitudinal, transverse, and shear directions. A semi‐empirical formulation is developed to calculate longitudinal, transverse, and shear strengths based on the properties of the utilized nanocomposite filament in the feedstock of the printer. The results show a very good agreement with numerical modeling and experimental results. Finally, a simple formulation is developed based on a quadratic failure criterion in combination with classical lamination theory to predict the strength for 3D‐printed specimens with different raster orientations. The developed analytical model shows an excellent agreement with experimental observations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Material Properties and Applications · Advanced Theoretical and Applied Studies in Material Sciences and Geometry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Composites Research Laboratory, College of Interdisciplinary Science and Technology University of Tehran Tehran Iran

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3844/ajassp.2019.244.27210.3844/ajassp.2019.244.272 ↗
2. 10.3390/ma1421644210.3390/ma14216442 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10833610.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108336 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10611410.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106114 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10910210.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109102 ↗
6. 10.3389/fchem.2021.68425610.3389/fchem.2021.684256 ↗
7. 10.3390/ijms2307379010.3390/ijms23073790 ↗
8. 10.3390/buildings1211202310.3390/buildings12112023 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.sintl.2021.10014910.1016/j.sintl.2021.100149 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.03210.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.032 ↗
11. 10.1080/00450618.2019.160908810.1080/00450618.2019.1609088 ↗
12. 10.3390/dj1010018110.3390/dj10100181 ↗
13. 10.1177/002199831770470910.1177/0021998317704709 ↗
14. Polymer/Graphene Nanocomposites via 3D and 4D Printing—Design and Technical Potential
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10742010.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107420 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.03.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2016.03.013 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.04510.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.045 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.04.00310.1016/j.apmt.2017.04.003 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.005 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2442210.1002/pc.24422 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11244210.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112442 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10340210.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103402 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.10754510.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107545 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.014 ↗
25. 10.1007/s13369-023-08562-610.1007/s13369-023-08562-6 ↗
26. Effect of Carbon Nanotube Reinforcement on Creep and Recovery Behavior of Additively Manufactured Polymers: An Experimental and Prediction Study
27. 10.3390/polym1410210510.3390/polym14102105 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00170-020-05648-510.1007/s00170-020-05648-5 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.60010.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.600 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.addma.2024.10408510.1016/j.addma.2024.104085 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11645910.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116459 ↗
32. 10.1080/23311916.2020.172089410.1080/23311916.2020.1720894 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.addma.2024.10405510.1016/j.addma.2024.104055 ↗
34. 10.1007/s00339-024-07657-710.1007/s00339-024-07657-7 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.10244710.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102447 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cma.2019.11279010.1016/j.cma.2019.112790 ↗
37. 10.1007/s00466-013-0948-210.1007/s00466-013-0948-2 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10808910.1016/j.matdes.2019.108089 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10879910.1016/j.matdes.2020.108799 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10789410.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107894 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.00910.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.009 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10246010.1016/j.addma.2021.102460 ↗
43. Bilinear Constitutive Model for the Anisotropic Failure Prediction of PLA Specimens Produced by Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing
44. 10.1186/s40563-020-00128-110.1186/s40563-020-00128-1 ↗
45. Size Effects of Voids on the Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Parts
46. 10.1108/1355254011039554710.1108/13552540110395547 ↗
47. Estimating Strength of 3D‐Printed Polymers Based on the Appraisal of Available Methods