Flexural Fatigue Behavior of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer‐Balsa Sandwich Panels Under Hygrothermal Environment
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT GFRP‐balsa sandwich structures with glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) as face sheets and balsa wood as core are increasingly being used in the infrastructure field. But there are significant differences in the moisture absorption and thermal expansion properties of GFRP face sheets and balsa wood core, and the structures are susceptible to fatigue failure under hygrothermal environments and cyclic loading. In the paper, the fatigue behavior of GFRP‐balsa sandwich panels under different temperatures with 95% relative humidity (RH) was investigated. Four‐point bending fatigue tests were carried out to analyze the effects of load level, temperature, and aging time on the failure mode and fatigue life of sandwich panels. The results showed that the flexural fatigue failure modes of GFRP‐balsa sandwich panels were mainly core shear damage and interface debonding, and the fatigue life decreased with the increase of load level, temperature, and aging time. Based on the test results and Weibull model, the fatigue life curves of the specimens under different survival rates were obtained ( P‐S‐N curve). The cumulative damage model considering core shear modulus degradation was developed, which could predict fatigue damage evolution of the specimens after hygrothermal aging.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Civil Engineering Nanjing Tech University Nanjing China
Nanjing Bridge Section, China Railway Shanghai Bureau Group Co, Ltd Nanjing China
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11154610.1016/j.tws.2023.111546 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.2808310.1002/pc.28083 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10597710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105977 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2296710.1002/pc.22967 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.06210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.062 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.10808810.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108088 ↗
7. 10.1177/109963621983013410.1177/1099636219830134 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.02.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.02.004 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.10488510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.104885 ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1460‐2695.1993.tb00109.x10.1111/j.1460‐2695.1993.tb00109.x ↗
11. 10.1177/00219983950290180310.1177/002199839502901803 ↗
12. 10.1243/030932497151317510.1243/0309324971513175 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.02.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2010.02.006 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.02.02710.1016/j.compstruct.2014.02.027 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11919410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119194 ↗
16. Bending Fatigue Experiment on Paulownia Core Sandwich Composite Beam
17. 10.1007/s12205‐010‐1025‐410.1007/s12205‐010‐1025‐4 ↗
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.000042310.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.0000423 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10559210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105592 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.04.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2018.04.005 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2468710.1002/pc.24687 ↗
22. 10.1002/app.4865210.1002/app.48652 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12604410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126044 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.03510.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.035 ↗
25. 10.1177/002199831984847910.1177/0021998319848479 ↗
26. 10.1007/s12221‐021‐0834‐z10.1007/s12221‐021‐0834‐z ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.02810.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.028 ↗
28. 10.1177/09673911040120070210.1177/096739110401200702 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.07210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.072 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.istruc.2015.10.00810.1016/j.istruc.2015.10.008 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.02410.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.024 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11831910.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118319 ↗
33. 10.1177/0954406223116485210.1177/09544062231164852 ↗
34. 10.1002/pc.2570010.1002/pc.25700 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cis.2014.12.00510.1016/j.cis.2014.12.005 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.03.02710.1016/j.compositesb.2014.03.027 ↗
37. ASTM C393/C393M‐20 · 2020
38. ASTM D3039/D3039M‐17 · 2017
39. ASTM D3410/D3410M‐16e1 · 2021
40. ASTM C365/C365M‐22 · 2022
41. ASTM C273‐00e1 · 2017
42. GB/T 2573–2008 · 2008
43. GB/T 2423.3–2016 · 2016
44. 10.14136/j.cnki.issn1673‐2812.2018.03.02610.14136/j.cnki.issn1673‐2812.2018.03.026 ↗
45. Influences of Temperature and Humid Heat Environment on Mechanical Properties of Glass Fiber Reinforced Composites
46. 10.3390/polym1403047210.3390/polym14030472 ↗
47. 10.1007/s10443‐020‐09864‐w10.1007/s10443‐020‐09864‐w ↗
48. 10.19817/j.cnki.issn1006‐3536.2024.01.02710.19817/j.cnki.issn1006‐3536.2024.01.027 ↗
49. 10.13204/j.gyjzG2207240910.13204/j.gyjzG22072409 ↗
50. 10.3139/120.11100110.3139/120.111001 ↗
51. 10.1002/pc.2776110.1002/pc.27761 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.03.01310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.03.013 ↗