journal article·2025-10-10

Investigation on delamination behavior of additively manufactured Kevlar and carbon composites subjected to Mode‐II loading conditions

Kuldeep Yadav, Vikrant Tiwari

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract With increased design and manufacturing complexity of required components in various industries, additive manufacturing of composites shows great potential in the production of next‐generation lightweight structures. Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is one such method of composite fabrication where components are 3D printed by heating a filament material above its gel temperature and depositing it on previously printed layers. The composite components fabricated by FFF are known to be susceptible to delamination owing to weak interlayer adhesion. This experimental study is an attempt to understand the underlying interlaminar delamination phenomenon of FFF‐printed end‐notched flexure (ENF) composite specimens subjected to mode‐II loading conditions. The composite specimens are 3D printed by an industrial FFF printer utilizing micro carbon fiber infused Nylon aka Onyx as the base specimen material. Either Onyx, continuous carbon fibers, or continuous Kevlar fibers are used as interfacial materials for the current study. In addition, the ENF composite specimen arms are optimally reinforced with continuous carbon fibers in pre‐selected layers of the specimen. The first category of specimens comprising three different interface material configurations aims to understand the delamination behavior of Onyx layers with other Onyx layers or continuous fiber reinforced layers (Onyx//Onyx, Onyx//Kevlar, and Onyx//carbon). On the other hand, the second category comprising three other different interface material configurations aims to understand the delamination behavior of continuous fiber reinforced layers in the composite specimens (Kevlar//Kevlar, carbon//carbon, and Kevlar//carbon). In addition, the relative orientation of interfacial layers is also varied to investigate the effect of print orientation on the delamination behavior of ENF specimens. Digital image correlation (DIC) is employed to accurately quantify the extent of crack propagation by accessing full‐field shear strain distribution of the front face of specimens generated during a three‐point bend loading event under quasi‐static loading conditions. The resistance to crack initiation and propagation is observed to be highly dependent on interfacial layer materials and their relative orientation. Highlights Interlaminar fracture of additively manufactured composites under mode‐II loading. DIC technique is used for quantifying crack advancement during loading events. Twelve different interfaces of additively manufactured composites are analyzed. Effects of print orientation and interface material type are investigated. Delaminated surfaces are examined to correlate underlying fracture mechanisms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Applied Mechanics Indian Institute of Technology Delhi New Delhi India

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1243/09544060376255458710.1243/095440603762554587 ↗
2. 10.1108/0144515031069864310.1108/01445150310698643 ↗
3. Campbell T · 2011 · 1
4. ISO/ASTM 52900:2021.Additive Manufacturing—General Principles—Fundamentals and Vocabulary.
5. Advances in three‐dimensional printing‐state of the art and future perspectives
6. HullCW.Apparatus for production of three‐dimensional objects by stereolithography. US 4575330 A. Google Patents.
7. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.03.01610.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.03.016 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0010-4485(00)00064-610.1016/S0010-4485(00)00064-6 ↗
9. 10.1108/1355254001030986810.1108/13552540010309868 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.08.01310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.08.013 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.09.03910.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.09.039 ↗
12. 10.1179/1743280411Y.000000001410.1179/1743280411Y.0000000014 ↗
13. 10.1108/RPJ-01-2013-001210.1108/RPJ-01-2013-0012 ↗
14. 10.1089/3dp.2015.003010.1089/3dp.2015.0030 ↗
15. 10.1038/nbt.295810.1038/nbt.2958 ↗
16. Opening access to space by maximizing utilization of 3D printing in launch vehicle design and production
17. MatterK.3D printed rocket launched using innovative NASA alloy. Accessed May 2.2023https://www.nasa.gov/feature/glenn/2023/3d-printed-rocket-launched-using-innovative-nasa-alloy
18. GohdC.Meet Relativity Space: the little 3D printing rocket company that could. Accessed July 03 2022.2022https://www.space.com/relativity-space-companyterran-1-launch
19. 10.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.00310.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.003 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.03410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.01.00210.1016/j.addma.2018.01.002 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.02010.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10272410.1016/j.addma.2022.102724 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2025.10489010.1016/j.tafmec.2025.104890 ↗
25. Li L · 2002 · 400
26. 10.3390/ma1210166410.3390/ma12101664 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.48410.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.484 ↗
28. A systematic survey of FDM process parameter optimization and their influence on part characteristics
29. 10.3390/ma1105082610.3390/ma11050826 ↗
30. 10.1002/app.4828810.1002/app.48288 ↗
31. 10.3390/ma1302035210.3390/ma13020352 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.01.03110.1016/j.polymer.2018.01.031 ↗
33. 10.1111/ffe.1421210.1111/ffe.14212 ↗
34. 10.1177/002199831558331710.1177/0021998315583317 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.01810.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.018 ↗
36. Stratasys.Nylon 12CF. Material specification.https://www.stratasys.co.in/siteassets/materials/materials‐catalog/fdm‐materials/nylon‐12cf/material.datasheet‐fdm‐nylon‐12cf.pdf?v=490354
37. Stratasys.Nylon‐CF10. Material specification.https://www.stratasys.co.in/siteassets/materials/materials‐catalog/fdm‐materials/nylon‐cf10/fdm‐nylon‐cf10‐material‐datasheet.pdf?v=497bab#FDM%20Nylon%20CF10%20‐%20Material%20Datasheet
38. Markforged.Onyx. Material specification.https://static.markforged.com/downloads/composites‐data‐sheet.pdf
39. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.10252310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102523 ↗
40. 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.60.1210.3221/IGF-ESIS.60.12 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.11.06510.1016/j.rinp.2018.11.065 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.08510.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.085 ↗
43. 10.3390/nano801004910.3390/nano8010049 ↗
44. 10.1177/002199831664616910.1177/0021998316646169 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.013 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.013 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.08810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10714710.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107147 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ast.2021.10665310.1016/j.ast.2021.106653 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.05110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.051 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.05210.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.052 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.03910.1016/j.addma.2018.04.039 ↗
53. 10.1080/1042691000891297610.1080/10426910008912976 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.01610.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016 ↗
55. 10.1108/1355254021044116610.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10183010.1016/j.addma.2020.101830 ↗
57. 10.1002/pc.2806510.1002/pc.28065 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.03210.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.032 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10220410.1016/j.addma.2021.102204 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10889110.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108891 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.03810.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.038 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10214410.1016/j.addma.2021.102144 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10307710.1016/j.addma.2022.103077 ↗
64. Hart RJ · 2018
65. 10.1002/pc.2658810.1002/pc.26588 ↗
66. 10.1080/15376494.2025.246271510.1080/15376494.2025.2462715 ↗
67. ASTM International
68. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.02.02310.1016/j.addma.2018.02.023 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.coco.2023.10153210.1016/j.coco.2023.101532 ↗
70. Ply and interlaminar behaviours of 3D printed continuous carbon fibre‐reinforced thermoplastic laminates; effects of processing conditions and microstructure
71. 10.1177/089270571987486010.1177/0892705719874860 ↗
72. Critical energy rate analysis of fracture strength