journal article·2026-02-10Open access

Manufacturing of PP ‐Based Composite Sandwich Panels via Simultaneous Foaming and Skin‐Core Bonding

Paolo Trucillo, Amal Alliyankal Vijayakumar, Muhammad Zahid, Alfonso Maffezzoli, Ernesto Di Maio

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sandwich panels are skin‐core‐skin structures commonly used in aerospace applications due to their high strength‐to‐weight ratio and flexural stiffness. The most widespread manufacturing approach involves the use of fiber‐reinforced thermosetting polymer skins bonded to aramid honeycomb core. This choice generates critical issues, such as high production cost and low recyclability of main components. As an alternative, we introduced a one‐shot manufacturing technique to produce thermoplastic polypropylene (PP)‐based sandwich panels, enabling simultaneous physical foaming and its fusion with skins. Two different PPs were used in this work: a foaming‐grade polypropylene for the core and a higher melting point polypropylene used for the fiberglass composite skins. The method involved the saturation of the system, composed of two pre‐fabricated PP‐fiberglass laminates (skins) and a slab of neat PP (core), at 100 bar and 153°C, followed by controlled cooling to different temperatures and rapid depressurization to 1 bar. Under optimized conditions (final temperature 140°C), the core showed a 700% expansion ratio while the skins retained their structural integrity, allowing the formation of strong interfacial bonds without the use of adhesives. Flexural stiffness of 1822 MPa has been measured in 3‐point‐bending tests. Mode I skin/core fracture toughness tests were performed; crack propagation did not occur along the skin/core interface, as typically observed in the presence of weak interfacial adhesion. Instead, the crack deviated from this path, penetrating through the low‐density regions of foam core and into skins, indicating strong adhesion between structural layers. The method has been demonstrated to be quick and economic in producing fully thermoplastic, fiber‐reinforced sandwich panels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Foaming and Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, dei Materiali e della Produzione Industriale University of Naples Federico II Napoli Italy

foamlab University of Naples Federico II Napoli Italy

Department of Engineering for Innovation University of Salento Lecce Italy

Quantum Technologies, Optronics and Material Laboratories Leonardo Innovation Hub, Leonardo SpA Grottaglie Italy

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. A Review on Recent Applications and Future Prospectus of Hybrid Composites
2. 10.1007/s42114-023-00678-510.1007/s42114-023-00678-5 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00441-510.1016/S1359-6454(03)00441-5 ↗
4. 10.1007/978-3-319-49382-4_510.1007/978-3-319-49382-4_5 ↗
5. 10.3390/buildings1406156610.3390/buildings14061566 ↗
6. 10.1177/1099636221103056410.1177/10996362211030564 ↗
7. 10.1177/089270571560468110.1177/0892705715604681 ↗
8. 10.3390/jcs703010210.3390/jcs7030102 ↗
9. Sahib M. M. · 2022 · 720
10. E. W.Veenstra “Aluminum‐Plastic‐Aluminum Sandwich Sheet for Maximum Weight Reduction in Body Panels (No. 930706) ” SAE Technical Paper 1993.10.4271/930706 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11665-021-05604-810.1007/s11665-021-05604-8 ↗
12. Palkowski H. · 2014 · 1
13. 10.1016/0010-4361(86)90749-410.1016/0010-4361(86)90749-4 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.11.00510.1016/j.promfg.2018.11.005 ↗
15. 10.3390/polym1513293910.3390/polym15132939 ↗
16. 10.3390/polym1419415310.3390/polym14194153 ↗
17. 10.1590/S1516-1439200600030000210.1590/S1516-14392006000300002 ↗
18. 10.1002/suco.20170028810.1002/suco.201700288 ↗
19. Kerf Bending: Ruled Double Curved Surfaces Manufacturing
20. 10.3390/ma1421663110.3390/ma14216631 ↗
21. 10.3390/polym1501019310.3390/polym15010193 ↗
22. 10.3390/app1217876610.3390/app12178766 ↗
23. 10.1007/BF0325788710.1007/BF03257887 ↗
24. 10.1007/978-3-030-88192-4_1610.1007/978-3-030-88192-4_16 ↗
25. 10.1002/pen.2142410.1002/pen.21424 ↗
26. 10.1002/pc.2554310.1002/pc.25543 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11101310.1016/j.matdes.2022.111013 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.10942610.1016/j.tws.2022.109426 ↗
29. 10.1016/S1359-835X(96)00098-X10.1016/S1359-835X(96)00098-X ↗
30. 10.1007/s10443-012-9258-710.1007/s10443-012-9258-7 ↗
31. Thermal Stability and Degradation Kinetics of Polymeric Materials: A Review
32. The Effect of Oil Palm Fiber Loading on Friction and Wear of Thermoset Composites
33. 10.1021/ie501995m10.1021/ie501995m ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.02710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.027 ↗
35. The Effect of Core and Skin Materials on Mechanical Properties of Composite Sandwich Panels
36. Mechanical, Thermal, and Flammability Properties of Polypropylene Composites Reinforced With Mineral Fillers
37. Thermomechanical Properties of Polypropylene‐Based Nanocomposites Reinforced With Clay Nanoparticles
38. The Effect of Processing on the Mechanical Properties and Durability of Polypropylene Composites Reinforced With Glass Fibers
39. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.57410.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.574 ↗
40. 10.1007/978-3-030-12314-7_510.1007/978-3-030-12314-7_5 ↗
41. 10.1080/15583724.2015.101913610.1080/15583724.2015.1019136 ↗
42. 10.1201/978142000598110.1201/9781420005981 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.09.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2018.09.017 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.03310.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.033 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.tws.2018.09.02310.1016/j.tws.2018.09.023 ↗
46. 10.3390/ma506108410.3390/ma5061084 ↗
47. 10.1177/073168441453079010.1177/0731684414530790 ↗
48. 10.1002/adem.20230179810.1002/adem.202301798 ↗
49. 10.1177/0021955X1039318210.1177/0021955X10393182 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.07.00510.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.07.005 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ces.2009.12.01610.1016/j.ces.2009.12.016 ↗
52. 10.1515/ipp-2022-002610.1515/ipp-2022-0026 ↗
53. “Standard Test Method for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber‐Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites ” accessed May 27 2024 https://www.astm.org/d5528‐13.html.
54. 10.1177/002199830707997410.1177/0021998307079974 ↗
55. 10.3390/jcs801001810.3390/jcs8010018 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.007 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10696110.1016/j.tws.2020.106961 ↗
58. 10.1002/adv.2018610.1002/adv.20186 ↗
59. 10.5755/j01.ms.18.1.134010.5755/j01.ms.18.1.1340 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10664110.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106641 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.05710.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.057 ↗
62. 10.1002/app.5457410.1002/app.54574 ↗