Study on the Properties of Short Glass Fiber‐Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Prepared by Fused Deposition Modeling
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is an efficient and flexible three‐dimensional (3D) printing manufacturing technology. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites, as high‐performance special engineering plastics, exhibit considerable potential for industrial applications. In this study, short glass fiber (GF)‐reinforced PEEK composites with varied fiber contents were fabricated via FDM. Pure PEEK specimens printed via FDM were used as the control group, and their mechanical, thermal, tribological, and electrical properties were systematically evaluated. The results indicated that 10 wt% GF‐reinforced PEEK (10GF/PEEK) had the best mechanical and tribological properties. The incorporation of GF notably enhanced the dimensional stability of PEEK and increased its dielectric constant. The dominant wear mechanism of pure PEEK was fatigue wear, while that of the composite material was abrasive wear and adhesive wear. This study may provide a theoretical foundation for the industrial application of GF‐reinforced PEEK.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tribology and Wear Analysis · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Polymer crystallization and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Engineering University of Jinan Jinan China
Shandong Woheng Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Zaozhuang China
Trauma Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Shandong University Jinan China
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.013 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10118‐021‐2513‐310.1007/s10118‐021‐2513‐3 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.01.00210.1016/j.addma.2018.01.002 ↗
6. 10.1007/978-3-031-57324-8_2110.1007/978-3-031-57324-8_21 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.03910.1016/j.addma.2018.04.039 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.03610.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.036 ↗
9. 10.1016/B978-0-12-812524-3.00007-710.1016/B978-0-12-812524-3.00007-7 ↗
10. 10.1002/app.4908710.1002/app.49087 ↗
11. 10.1108/1355254001032358310.1108/13552540010323583 ↗
12. 10.1016/S1359‐835X(00)00068‐310.1016/S1359‐835X(00)00068‐3 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10768810.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107688 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.03810.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.038 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10714710.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107147 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.7010710.1002/pc.70107 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10817510.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108175 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.triboint.2024.10935610.1016/j.triboint.2024.109356 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11029210.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110292 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2009.12.00310.1016/j.cryogenics.2009.12.003 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10581210.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105812 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11497510.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114975 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cjmeam.2023.10007610.1016/j.cjmeam.2023.100076 ↗
24. 10.1186/s10033‐021‐00538‐710.1186/s10033‐021‐00538‐7 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.11406410.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114064 ↗
26. American Society of Testing Materials · 2017
27. American Society of Testing Materials · 2015
28. 10.1016/0032‐3861(83)90144‐110.1016/0032‐3861(83)90144‐1 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.03.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2010.03.005 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.05.03210.1016/j.compscitech.2018.05.032 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.02.02810.1016/j.compscitech.2019.02.028 ↗
32. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.7410.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.74 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.triboint.2018.02.02910.1016/j.triboint.2018.02.029 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.wear.2025.20600010.1016/j.wear.2025.206000 ↗
35. 10.1002/pat.113310.1002/pat.1133 ↗
36. 10.3390/polym1210218410.3390/polym12102184 ↗