journal article·2026-02-20Open access

Improved Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Carbon Fiber/Epoxy/Core‐Shell Rubber Composites by Multiscale Toughening Mechanisms

Fukang Li, Ning Ding, Jean Jacques Kouadjo Tchekwagep, Martin Pengou, Hervé Kouamo Tchakouté, Qiuyue Ding, Nan Hou, Huixia Xu

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) composites, prized for their outstanding mechanical properties, have garnered extensive applications across critical industries including aerospace, transportation, new energy systems, and power infrastructure. However, under increasingly demanding service environments, improving the interlaminar fracture toughness of CFRP composites has become a pivotal challenge to ensure structural integrity and longevity. The present work presents an effective design strategy to address this issue for the carbon fiber/epoxy/core‐shell rubber composite by integrating multi‐scale reinforcements. The mechanical performance of specimens with different compositions was systematically analyzed. Synergistic multi‐scale toughening mechanisms were rigorously elucidated through fracture surface morphology analysis and correlative mechanical data interpretation. The results demonstrate that incorporating short carbon fibers (SCF) into CFRP (i) and adding core‐shell rubber (CSR) to CFRP (ii) both significantly enhance the toughness. CFRP (iii), which contains both SCF and CSR, exhibits an even more pronounced toughening effect. The subsequent grafting of carboxylated multi‐walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs‐COOH) onto SCF, resulting in CFRP (iv) with SCF‐CNTs and CSR mixed, demonstrates superior interlaminar fracture toughness compared to CFRP (iii). Specifically, the and of CFRP (iv) increase by 12.89% and 15.46%, respectively, compared to CFRP (iii). This improvement is attributed to the strengthened interfacial bonding between MWCNTs‐COOH and the matrix through mechanical interlocking, which enhances fiber bridging and the effects of core‐shell rubber. This multi‐scale reinforcement paradigm provides critical insights into the design of damage‐tolerant CFRP composites for extreme operational scenarios, advancing their deployment in next‐generation engineering systems subjected to complex mechanical loads.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences) Jinan P. R. China

Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Shandong Analysis and Test Center, Engineering Research Center of Failure Analysis and Safety Assessment Jinan P. R. China

School of Materials Science and Engineering University of Jinan Jinan Shandong China

Laboratory of Analytical Electrochemistry and Materials Engineering, Department of Inorganic Chemistry University of Yaoundé 1 Yaoundé Cameroon

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province · Shandong Academy of Sciences · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.02810.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.028 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10731310.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107313 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10963910.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109639 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.09.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2016.09.005 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10813010.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108130 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10966010.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109660 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11111010.1016/j.compositesb.2023.111110 ↗
8. 10.1115/1.404382910.1115/1.4043829 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.10448710.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104487 ↗
10. 10.1177/095400832091169610.1177/0954008320911696 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10853-016-0468-510.1007/s10853-016-0468-5 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.10468510.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104685 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.12164010.1016/j.polymer.2019.121640 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jiec.2015.09.02210.1016/j.jiec.2015.09.022 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.08.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2017.08.003 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.coco.2022.10139710.1016/j.coco.2022.101397 ↗
17. 10.1016/S1872-5805(23)60741-310.1016/S1872-5805(23)60741-3 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10551010.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105510 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11098410.1016/j.tws.2023.110984 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.02.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2018.02.007 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11144110.1016/j.tws.2023.111441 ↗
22. 10.3390/ma1602056010.3390/ma16020560 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10853-013-7963-810.1007/s10853-013-7963-8 ↗
24. 10.1088/2053-1591/abf53010.1088/2053-1591/abf530 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.10831910.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108319 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11196710.1016/j.tws.2024.111967 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.04.05410.1016/j.carbon.2015.04.054 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.06.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2017.06.001 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10853-018-03195-910.1007/s10853-018-03195-9 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.06.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2013.06.021 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11686510.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116865 ↗
32. 10.1007/s42765-022-00160-910.1007/s42765-022-00160-9 ↗
33. 10.1002/pc.2748810.1002/pc.27488 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10990010.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109900 ↗
35. 10.1017/aer.2021.9510.1017/aer.2021.95 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.coco.2021.10089810.1016/j.coco.2021.100898 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11176710.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111767 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.03.02010.1016/j.compscitech.2014.03.020 ↗
39. 10.1039/C5NR01354B10.1039/C5NR01354B ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11696610.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116966 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.08810.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.088 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.09.00510.1016/j.jcis.2020.09.005 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11507310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115073 ↗
44. 10.3390/polym706102010.3390/polym7061020 ↗
45. 10.1007/s00289-022-04413-w10.1007/s00289-022-04413-w ↗
46. ASTM · 2017
47. 10.1088/1757-899X/577/1/01203010.1088/1757-899X/577/1/012030 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11012310.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110123 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12263310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122633 ↗
50. 10.3390/polym1510230910.3390/polym15102309 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.10.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2011.10.009 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11721410.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117214 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.surfin.2023.10307010.1016/j.surfin.2023.103070 ↗
54. 10.1007/s10853-020-05612-410.1007/s10853-020-05612-4 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11054410.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110544 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.coco.2024.10205110.1016/j.coco.2024.102051 ↗
57. 10.3390/ma1619661110.3390/ma16196611 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.06.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2016.06.005 ↗