Improving Sensitivity and Specificity of Amyloid-β Peptides and Tau Protein Detection with Antibiofouling Magnetic Nanoparticles for Liquid Biopsy of Alzheimer’s Disease
Source abstract
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a growing global healthcare burden affecting the aging population and society. Given the lack of effective treatment to AD, early detection at the prodromal stage and timely monitoring of changes during progression are considered the best approach to control and intervene in disease progression. “Liquid biopsy” of AD biomarkers amyloid-β peptides (Aβs) and tau proteins in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or blood samples holds great promises for cost-effective, widely accessible, and easy-administrated noninvasive detection and follow-up of AD. However, current in vitro detection methods have not yet demonstrated sufficient sensitivity and specificity using neither Aβs nor tau proteins biomarkers. One major challenge of accurate detection and measurement of biomarker levels in biofluidic samples is the biofouling effect with nonspecific adsorption of unwanted biomolecules, such as various serum proteins, on the surface of targeted detecting agents or devices, causing false-positive and false-negative findings. In this study, antibiofouling polymer polyethylene glycol-block-allyl glycidyl ether (PEG-b-AGE) coated magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) capable of suppressing the nonspecific interactions with biomolecules, especially proteins, were investigated for the immunomagnetic capturing of Aβ40 and Aβ42 peptides and tau protein spiked in CSF- and serum-mimicking samples using corresponding antibodies conjugated as targeting ligands. Antibody-conjugated antibiofouling IONPs demonstrated improved specificity (>90%) and sensitivity (>95%) over those of antibody-conjugated magnetic micron beads (Dynabeads, ∼50% specificity and 30–40% sensitivity) widely used as magnetic separating agents under the same experimental conditions with the presence of nontargeted interfering proteins. The antibody-conjugated IONPs also exhibited significantly higher sensitivities (80–90%) and better performance of capturing Aβs and tau protein from the human whole blood samples than antibody-conjugated Dynabeads (∼20%).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Alzheimer's disease research and treatments · Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications · Protein Structure and Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, 1841 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30329, United States
Division of Research, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine−Georgia Campus, 625 Old Peachtree Road NW, Suwanee, Georgia 30039, United States
Ocean Nanotech, LLC, 7964 Arjons Drive, San Diego, California 92126, United States of America
Funding
National Cancer Institute
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jalz.2007.04.38110.1016/j.jalz.2007.04.381 ↗
2. 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.11110.1038/nrneurol.2017.111 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0197-4580(97)00056-010.1016/S0197-4580(97)00056-0 ↗
4. 10.1007/s40120-017-0074-810.1007/s40120-017-0074-8 ↗
5. 10.1038/nrdp.2015.5610.1038/nrdp.2015.56 ↗
6. 10.1038/nature2545610.1038/nature25456 ↗
7. 10.1038/srep2515510.1038/srep25155 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.5b0361910.1021/acsami.5b03619 ↗
9. 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70252-210.1016/S1474-4422(14)70252-2 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0516910.1021/acs.jpcc.7b05169 ↗
11. 10.1021/nn900813b10.1021/nn900813b ↗
12. 10.1021/nl080813210.1021/nl0808132 ↗
13. 10.1098/rsos.17180810.1098/rsos.171808 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41598-017-09370-310.1038/s41598-017-09370-3 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.10.02610.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.10.026 ↗
16. 10.1039/C7TB01695F10.1039/C7TB01695F ↗
17. 10.1038/nnano.2012.23710.1038/nnano.2012.237 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.12.00410.1016/j.jalz.2016.12.004 ↗
19. 10.1212/WNL.000000000000324610.1212/WNL.0000000000003246 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.01.01310.1016/j.jalz.2013.01.013 ↗
21. 10.1039/C4TB01828A10.1039/C4TB01828A ↗
22. 10.1039/C4TB00811A10.1039/C4TB00811A ↗
23. 10.1007/s00401-011-0861-810.1007/s00401-011-0861-8 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)01754-210.1016/S0304-3940(01)01754-2 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.01.00410.1016/j.jalz.2018.01.004 ↗
26. 10.1186/alzrt16310.1186/alzrt163 ↗
27. 10.1001/archneur.57.1.10010.1001/archneur.57.1.100 ↗
28. 10.1001/archneur.64.3.noc6012310.1001/archneur.64.3.noc60123 ↗
29. Walker H. K. · 1990
30. 10.1074/mcp.R200007-MCP20010.1074/mcp.R200007-MCP200 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jalz.2008.10.00410.1016/j.jalz.2008.10.004 ↗
32. 10.3233/JAD-2009-094810.3233/JAD-2009-0948 ↗
33. 10.1242/dmm.03178110.1242/dmm.031781 ↗
34. 10.1186/s13195-017-0324-010.1186/s13195-017-0324-0 ↗
35. 10.1021/jacs.8b0864510.1021/jacs.8b08645 ↗
36. 10.1039/C7TB02562A10.1039/C7TB02562A ↗