Full‐Scale Cohesive Zone Modeling and Experimental Investigation of Debonding Behaviors in Root Joints for Wind Turbine Blades
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study investigates the failure behavior of wind turbine blade root joints, employing a full‐scale nonlinear progressive model validated through the building block approach. The model integrates two principal failure mechanisms: A cohesive zone model (CZM) for interface failures between steel‐to‐composite and composite‐to‐composite components; a progressive damage model for the failure of composite structures. At the lowest level of the test pyramid for the building block approach are the sandwich double cantilever beam (DCB) and end notch flexure (ENF) tests, which are used to obtain the interface material properties for the glass fiber–reinforced plastics (GFRP)‐to‐steel interfaces and to validate the CZM parameters. Composite failure was simulated using a progressive damage approach based on material property degradation rules. The failure behaviors for the root joint component were experimentally tested and analyzed with simulations. The results show that the failure modes predicted by the numerical simulations are consistent with the experimental observations, with a deviation of 3% in the maximum failure load. Debonding at the GFRP‐to‐steel interface is the precursor to root joint failure, leading to the damage of wrap yarn. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the longitudinal stiffness of the UD block in the root joint significantly influences the maximum load‐bearing capacity. The validated model offers valuable insights for optimizing root joint design to improve wind turbine blade performance and durability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering Wuhan University of Technology Wuhan Hubei China
Sinoma Wind Power Blade Co., Ltd. Beijing China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Brondsted P. · 2023 · 3
2. Modeling Methods and Test Verification of Root Insert Contact Interface for Wind Turbine Blade
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.10.02510.1016/j.compstruct.2014.10.025 ↗
4. DNV GL AS · 2015
5. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10813010.1016/j.tws.2021.108130 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.10285110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.102851 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.08.02410.1016/j.compositesb.2012.08.024 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.10303010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.103030 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11079110.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110791 ↗
10. Status of Numerical Simulation Methods for Delamination Damage of Composite Laminates
11. 10.1016/S0013‐7944(01)00106‐010.1016/S0013‐7944(01)00106‐0 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.05210.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.052 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.03.02110.1016/j.compositesb.2011.03.021 ↗
14. 10.1080/00218464.2017.138390510.1080/00218464.2017.1383905 ↗
15. 10.3390/ma1203051310.3390/ma12030513 ↗
16. 10.1177/00219983870210090410.1177/002199838702100904 ↗
17. 10.1177/00219983990330240210.1177/002199839903302402 ↗
18. 10.1016/S1359‐8368(02)00033‐110.1016/S1359‐8368(02)00033‐1 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11627410.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116274 ↗
20. 10.1080/01694243.2012.74843410.1080/01694243.2012.748434 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.05.00610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.05.006 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.08.01210.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.08.012 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2016.12.00410.1016/j.euromechsol.2016.12.004 ↗
24. 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20250513.00210.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20250513.002 ↗
25. ASTM International “ASTM D5528/D5528M‐21—Standard Test Method for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber‐Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites ”https://doi.org/10.1520/D5528_D5528M‐21.10.1520/D5528_D5528M ↗
26. International Standards Organization “ISO 15024:2001 Fibre‐Reinforced Plastic Composites—Determination of Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness GIC for Unidirectionally Reinforced Material ”(2001) https://www.iso.org/standard/25581.html.
27. ASTM International “D7905_D7905M‐19E01 Standard Test Method for Determination of the Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber‐Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites ”https://doi.org/10.1520/D7905_D7905M‐19E01.10.1520/D7905_D7905M ↗
28. ANSYS Inc · 2020
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11098810.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110988 ↗
30. 10.7527/S1000‐6893.2018.2250910.7527/S1000‐6893.2018.22509 ↗