Performance and Failure Mechanisms of Interleaved E‐Glass/Epoxy Composites Using Knitted Fiber‐Reinforced Adhesive Films
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT In this study, an adhesive film with embedded knitted fibers is utilized as the interleaved layer to evaluate the effect of carrier fibers on delamination resistance, crack migration, and R‐curve behavior in glass fiber/epoxy composites. The interaction between the knitted fibers within the adhesive layer and their integration with the main laminate matrix is examined. Mode‐I and mode‐II R‐curves are determined using double cantilever beam (DCB) and end‐notch‐flexure (ENF) samples, respectively, with fractography used to characterize damage mechanisms and crack paths. The low viscosity of the epoxy matrix during pressurized curing causes redistribution of the knitted fibers and variations in the adhesive layer thickness along and across fiber orientations. This results in localized shifts in fracture mechanisms, leading to variations in toughness values. The weak interface between knit fibers and the adhesive layer matrix induces crack paths that cause significant fluctuations in G IC values in Mode‐I. The adhesive layer enhances fracture toughness by promoting a tortuous crack path, resulting in a 175.47% increase in G IC during propagation and a 171.56% increase in G IIC values during the initiation phase, respectively. The adhesive layer's thickness and fiber distribution, influenced by resin flow during manufacturing, played a critical role in fracture behavior. These findings provide insights into the mechanisms driving interlaminar toughening and highlight the potential of knitted fiber‐reinforced adhesive films for improving delamination resistance in composite structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Department of Manufacturing Engineering Sabanci University Tuzla Istanbul Turkey
Integrated Manufacturing Technologies Research and Application Center Sabanci University Tuzla Istanbul Turkey
Department of Lightweight Construction and Structural Mechanics (LSM) Technische Universität Darmstadt Darmstadt Germany
School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering The University of Sheffield Sheffield UK
References (78)
Show source-provided references
1. I. V.SelaandO.Ishai “Interlaminar Fracture Toughness and Toughening of Laminated Composite Materials: A Review ”20 no.5(1989):423–435.10.1016/0010-4361(89)90211-5 ↗
2. 10.1201/978142000598110.1201/9781420005981 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10776110.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107761 ↗
4. K.ShivakumarandR.Panduranga “Interleaved Polymer Matrix Composites—A Review ”InCollection of Technical Papers—AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 2013:1–13.10.2514/6.2013-1903 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10809410.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108094 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0142‐1123(01)00069‐X10.1016/S0142‐1123(01)00069‐X ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.03810.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.038 ↗
8. 10.1016/0266‐3538(91)90054‐S10.1016/0266‐3538(91)90054‐S ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.10.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2011.10.009 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0266‐3538(03)00167‐210.1016/S0266‐3538(03)00167‐2 ↗
11. 10.1177/0731684422114344810.1177/07316844221143448 ↗
12. 10.1177/0731684423116607810.1177/07316844231166078 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10809510.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108095 ↗
14. 10.1111/ffe.141610.1111/ffe.1416 ↗
15. 10.3390/fib504003810.3390/fib5040038 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.03.02010.1016/j.compscitech.2014.03.020 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.08.01910.1016/j.compstruct.2011.08.019 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.03.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2019.03.014 ↗
19. 10.1115/1.404084010.1115/1.4040840 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11269910.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112699 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10954410.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109544 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.01.02810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.01.028 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10904910.1016/j.matdes.2020.109049 ↗
24. 10.2514/1.4179110.2514/1.41791 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.12.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2011.12.002 ↗
26. 10.1177/095400831881215110.1177/0954008318812151 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.014 ↗
28. 10.1002/app.3347910.1002/app.33479 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10596210.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105962 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2694510.1002/pc.26945 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10990010.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109900 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11686510.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116865 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11050310.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110503 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.004 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10728310.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107283 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.10429210.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104292 ↗
37. 10.1002/pc.2849810.1002/pc.28498 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10946310.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109463 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.11.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2017.11.016 ↗
40. 10.1016/0266‐3538(95)00089‐510.1016/0266‐3538(95)00089‐5 ↗
41. 10.1016/S0266‐3538(98)00167‐510.1016/S0266‐3538(98)00167‐5 ↗
42. 10.1016/0266‐3538(92)90133‐N10.1016/0266‐3538(92)90133‐N ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.03510.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.035 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.007 ↗
45. 10.1016/0010‐4361(89)90341‐810.1016/0010‐4361(89)90341‐8 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.07.01110.1016/j.carbon.2012.07.011 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.10252310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102523 ↗
48. 10.1007/s10443‐020‐09848‐w10.1007/s10443‐020‐09848‐w ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.09.02610.1016/j.compositesa.2011.09.026 ↗
50. 10.1115/1.280681010.1115/1.2806810 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.016 ↗
52. M.Hojo “Thickness Effect of Double Cantilever Beam Specimen on Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of AS4/PEEK and T800/Epoxy Laminates ” 1993 https://doi.org/10.1520/STP24736S.10.1520/STP24736S ↗
53. 10.1016/0013-7944(94)90109-010.1016/0013-7944(94)90109-0 ↗
54. 10.1016/B978-0-444-87286-9.50015-210.1016/B978-0-444-87286-9.50015-2 ↗
55. 10.1163/156855196X0030110.1163/156855196X00301 ↗
56. 10.1016/S1359‐835X(99)00023‐810.1016/S1359‐835X(99)00023‐8 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.01.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2014.01.023 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.12.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2016.12.004 ↗
59. 10.1016/0266‐3538(95)00062‐310.1016/0266‐3538(95)00062‐3 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10761610.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107616 ↗
61. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.37.31710.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.37.317 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10633910.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106339 ↗
63. M.Hojo S.Matsuda S.Ochiai A.Murakami andH.Akimoto “The Role of Interleaf/Base Lamina Interphase in Toughening Mechanism of Interleaf‐Toughened Cfrp ” ICCM‐12 Conf. 1999.
64. Y. A.ResisandD. H.Reneker “Delamination Composites Prepared by Small Diamerter Fiber Reinforcement at Ply Interface ” 2001 1 (12) http://www.google.com/patents/US6265333.
65. ASTM D5528‐01 “Standard Test Method for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber‐Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites ” ASTM 2014:1–12.
66. ASTM D7905 “Standard Test Method for Determination of the Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber‐Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites ”ASTM 2014:1–18.
67. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials
68. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11726010.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117260 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10644310.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106443 ↗
70. 10.1016/0013‐7944(92)90151‐410.1016/0013‐7944(92)90151‐4 ↗
71. “3M. Structural Adhesive Film ” 2007 1–15.
72. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.10998110.1016/j.compscitech.2023.109981 ↗
73. 10.1177/002199831668118910.1177/0021998316681189 ↗
74. 10.1177/00219983920260030610.1177/002199839202600306 ↗
75. 10.3390/polym1323410310.3390/polym13234103 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10782710.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107827 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.08610.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.086 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11480710.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114807 ↗