journal article·2025-11-10

The Coupled Effects of Microstructure and Topology on the Piezoelectricity of Additively Manufactured Bi‐Continuous Piezocomposites

W.‐H. Yang, L. He, T.‐N. Yang, Z. Wang, X. Song, Y.‐C. Liu, L. Chen

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT Bi‐continuous piezocomposites with triply periodic minimum surfaces (TPC) are emerging flexible piezoelectric materials. The ceramic skeletons of TPC fabricated by the additive manufacturing process named suspension‐enclosing projection‐stereolithography (SEPS) contain various kinds of microstructural features. This paper develops a two‐scale model consisting of micrometer‐scale ceramic particle level and millimeter‐scale composite level to systematically evaluate the effects of key microstructure features (e.g., micro‐porosity) and various topologies of TPC piezocomposites on their piezoelectric responses. Design maps for hydrostatic piezoelectric charging coefficients d h show they can achieve optimal performance at wide ranges of micro‐porosity and geometry parameter u for the proposed TPC piezocomposites. In addition, geometry parameter u plays a dominant role in determining the intensity of hydrostatic voltage coefficient g h and hydrostatic figure of merit (HFOM) of all the presented TPC piezocomposites in the vicinity of the starting point of three‐dimensional (3D) interconnectivity. Within this range, these properties would increase first with the increase of micro‐porosity volume fraction (VF) and start to decrease once they reach peak values. The presented TPC piezocomposites exhibit superb hydrostatic properties, with the same 20% VF of ceramics and 2% VF of micro‐porosity with respect to composites and ceramics, respectively; TPC of face‐centered cubic (FCC) demonstrates 327‐fold enhancement of HFOM than that of the piezocomposite with three intersecting ceramic cuboids. The piezoelectric properties of FCC are superior to those of body‐centered cubic (BCC) and simple cubic (SC). These findings present a promising approach for designing additively manufactured TPC piezocomposites to achieve superb hydrostatic performances.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering Prairie View A&M University Prairie View Texas USA

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Center for Computer Aided Design University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA

Interdisciplinary Research Centre, School of Mechanical Engineering Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai China

Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

Department of Mechanical Engineering South Dakota State University Brookings South Dakota USA

Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Michigan Dearborn Michigan USA

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (76)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0025-5408(78)90161-710.1016/0025-5408(78)90161-7 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00137-710.1016/S1359-835X(98)00137-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00283-010.1016/S1359-6454(03)00283-0 ↗
4. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07165.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07165.x ↗
5. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/8/08503910.1088/0964-1726/25/8/085039 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.35709910.1063/1.357099 ↗
7. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01159.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01159.x ↗
8. 10.1143/JJAP.32.421410.1143/JJAP.32.4214 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0955-2219(01)00042-510.1016/S0955-2219(01)00042-5 ↗
10. 10.1109/TUFFC.2003.119362210.1109/TUFFC.2003.1193622 ↗
11. 10.1002/adem.20160080310.1002/adem.201600803 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20070081110.1002/adma.200700811 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20100395610.1002/adma.201003956 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.490212910.1063/1.4902129 ↗
15. 10.1115/1.404470810.1115/1.4044708 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.9b0420510.1021/acsami.9b04205 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.04310.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.043 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.08.01510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.08.015 ↗
19. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00109.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00109.x ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matchar.2006.01.01910.1016/j.matchar.2006.01.019 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11837-017-2303-010.1007/s11837-017-2303-0 ↗
22. 10.1115/IMECE2019-1067210.1115/IMECE2019-10672 ↗
23. An Integrated Model for Prediction of Process‐Structure‐Property Relationship for Additively Manufactured Al‐10Si‐Mg Alloy
24. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10841710.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108417 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10802110.1016/j.matdes.2019.108021 ↗
26. 10.1080/0015019820821062210.1080/00150198208210622 ↗
27. 10.1143/JPSJ.11.80710.1143/JPSJ.11.807 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00042-310.1016/S0022-5096(99)00042-3 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.128776810.1063/1.1287768 ↗
30. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00118-510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00118-5 ↗
31. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.13204110.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.132041 ↗
32. 10.2355/isijinternational.45.58710.2355/isijinternational.45.587 ↗
33. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00313-910.1016/S1359-6454(98)00313-9 ↗
34. Triply Periodic Surfaces and Multiply Continuous Structures From the Landau Model of Micromulsions
35. 10.1098/rsta.1996.008910.1098/rsta.1996.0089 ↗
36. 10.1007/s11837-017-2657-310.1007/s11837-017-2657-3 ↗
37. Image Processing With ImageJ
38. 10.2144/00011251710.2144/000112517 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compag.2008.02.00710.1016/j.compag.2008.02.007 ↗
40. 10.1038/nmeth0510-33910.1038/nmeth0510-339 ↗
41. 10.1038/nmeth.208910.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
42. 10.1016/0001-6160(84)90151-210.1016/0001-6160(84)90151-2 ↗
43. 10.1080/1364281860823896810.1080/13642818608238968 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0036-9748(88)80307-710.1016/S0036-9748(88)80307-7 ↗
45. 10.1016/0036-9748(85)90157-710.1016/0036-9748(85)90157-7 ↗
46. 10.1016/0021-9991(83)90087-610.1016/0021-9991(83)90087-6 ↗
47. 10.1080/0950083950824248410.1080/09500839508242484 ↗
48. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00084-810.1016/S1359-6454(02)00084-8 ↗
49. Y.Ji “Microstructure Design via Integrated Phase‐Field and FiniteElement Modeling for Additive Manufacturing of Functional Polymer‐Ceramic Composites ”2016.
50. 10.1021/acsami.7b1129210.1021/acsami.7b11292 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15840910.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158409 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.patter.2022.10049410.1016/j.patter.2022.100494 ↗
53. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1957.tb12580.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1957.tb12580.x ↗
54. Aimin Chang H. Z. · 2012
55. 10.1088/0964-1726/1/1/01210.1088/0964-1726/1/1/012 ↗
56. 10.1016/0022-460X(91)90762-910.1016/0022-460X(91)90762-9 ↗
57. 10.1016/0022-460X(90)90701-Z10.1016/0022-460X(90)90701-Z ↗
58. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00118-510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00118-5 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.02.01510.1016/j.jcp.2005.02.015 ↗
60. Coarsening Kinetics From a Variable‐Mobility Cahn‐Hilliard Equation: Application of Semi‐Implicit Fourier Spectral Method
61. Formlabs “Material Properties of Brium Titanate ”Formlabs www.formlabs.com.
62. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.06.01510.1016/j.actamat.2012.06.015 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.11.03010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.11.030 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.04.02110.1016/j.actamat.2019.04.021 ↗
65. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02389.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02389.x ↗
66. Analytical Modelling of 3‐3 Piezoelectric Composites
67. 10.1140/epjst/e2015-02600-y10.1140/epjst/e2015-02600-y ↗
68. 10.1080/0015019820821062310.1080/00150198208210623 ↗
69. 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00283-010.1016/S1359-6454(03)00283-0 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.08.02610.1016/j.actamat.2018.08.026 ↗
71. A.Gayon‐Lombardo L.Mosser N. P.Brandon andS. J.Cooper “Stochastic Reconstruction of Periodic Three‐Dimensional Multi‐Phase Electrode Microstructures Using Generative Adversarial Networks ”arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.11632 2020.
72. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.04410.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.044 ↗
73. 10.1016/S0955-2219(03)00194-810.1016/S0955-2219(03)00194-8 ↗
74. 10.1109/TDEI.2004.134977910.1109/TDEI.2004.1349779 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.08.06310.1016/j.actamat.2020.08.063 ↗
76. 10.1021/acsami.1c1294510.1021/acsami.1c12945 ↗