Exploring the Reinforcement Mechanism of Carbon Black in Natural Rubber: Insights From Surface Morphology and Molecular Chain Rigidity
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Carbon black (CB) is extensively applied in the tire manufacturing industry. Nevertheless, due to the sophisticated clustered structure of CB aggregates, it is arduous to elucidate the boundary between CB and rubber. Hence, we do not have a full understanding of how CB reinforces rubber. Quantitative analysis of the interface thickness in NR/CB composites was carried out by employing atomic force microscopy (AFM). Low‐field nuclear magnetic resonance (LF‐NMR) was used to characterize the molecular chain rigidity of NR/CB with various specific surface areas. The results indicate that the high SSA of CB arises from its intricate topological architecture characterized by a branched aggregate morphology. This structural complexity facilitates enhanced interfacial engagement with the NR matrix, leading to the formation of extended nanoscale interfacial regions and localized restrictions on polymer chain mobility.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer crystallization and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering Sichuan University of Science and Engineering Zigong People's Republic of China
Sichuan Province Key Laboratory for Corrosion and Protection of Material Zigong People's Republic of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.08.05310.1016/j.carbon.2021.08.053 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.05.23910.1016/j.jmrt.2024.05.239 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10786510.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107865 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10853-020-05503-810.1007/s10853-020-05503-8 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.12241910.1016/j.polymer.2020.122419 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.01710.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.017 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.csite.2019.10056610.1016/j.csite.2019.100566 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00264-510.1016/S0008-6223(00)00264-5 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.09.03210.1016/j.carbon.2022.09.032 ↗
10. 10.1038/2011213a010.1038/2011213a0 ↗
11. 10.1016/0008-6223(64)90051-X10.1016/0008-6223(64)90051-X ↗
12. 10.1177/009524431664595310.1177/0095244316645953 ↗
13. 10.1039/C8RA04631J10.1039/C8RA04631J ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.04.03310.1016/j.compscitech.2017.04.033 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11911510.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119115 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.06.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2013.06.019 ↗
17. 10.3390/polym1420439210.3390/polym14204392 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10834610.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108346 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.01610.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.016 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b0221410.1021/acs.macromol.5b02214 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.06.01410.1016/j.carbon.2010.06.014 ↗
22. 10.3390/polym1421464210.3390/polym14214642 ↗
23. 10.1021/mz500192r10.1021/mz500192r ↗
24. 10.3390/polym1509205110.3390/polym15092051 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.15996810.1016/j.cej.2025.159968 ↗
26. 10.3390/c101007710.3390/c1010077 ↗
27. 10.1038/nnano.2013.4610.1038/nnano.2013.46 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.polymer.2011.04.01510.1016/j.polymer.2011.04.015 ↗
29. 10.1021/ma200725510.1021/ma2007255 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10731210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107312 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.04.19610.1016/j.ceramint.2022.04.196 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10970510.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109705 ↗
33. 10.1021/ma501454t10.1021/ma501454t ↗