journal article·2025-05-10

Percolation theory analysis of nacre‐like bioinspired poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/graphene nanosheets‐iron oxide composites

Chien‐Lin Huang, En‐Zai Lin, Ping‐Zhang Tung, Ming‐Ru Xue

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Biomimetic polymer composites with micro/nano‐scale brick‐and‐mortar structures show promise for advancing nacre‐like polymer bioinspired nanocomposites. This study used a solvothermal method to graft MIL‐101 onto graphene oxide (GO), forming GO‐g‐MIL‐101. Subsequent heat treatments at 700 and 900°C under inert gas produced magnetic graphene nanosheets (GNS@Fe) with iron oxide particles. Poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) served as the matrix. PTT/GNS@Fe powders were prepared by coagulation then formed into bioinspired PTT/GNS@Fe and PTT/GNS@Fe‐m composites via solvent casting and hot pressing, yielding brick‐and‐mortar structures with and without magnetic alignment. PTT served as the soft phase and GNS@Fe as the hard phase. Rheological and conductivity analysis of PTT bioinspired composites, based on percolation theory, revealed microstructural changes. Results show that magnetic field assistance enhances GNS@Fe alignment in PTT/GNS@Fe‐m composites. With higher GNS@Fe content, reduced interlayer spacing creates a PTT‐GNS@Fe network, where nanoscale confinement limits PTT chain mobility, impacting crystallization. Low GNS@Fe levels promote crystallization, while high levels hinder it, with PTT unable to crystallize in nacre‐like composites above 40 wt% GNS@Fe. Additionally, we tested the electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding of the PTT/GNS@Fe bioinspired composite system, finding that the shielding efficiency of PTT/GNS@Fe‐m with 40 wt% filler, though affected in magnetism by processing, approaches commercial application levels. Highlights Rheological and conductivity analysis via percolation theory. Percolation analysis revealed microstructures in the nacre‐like composite. Magnetic self‐assembly in PTT/GNS@Fe‐m led to more oriented structures. Higher GNS@Fe content reduced spacing, forming PTT‐GNS@Fe networks. Nanoconfinement and adsorption limited PTT chains, reducing crystallinity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Fiber and Composite Materials Feng Chia University Taichung Taiwan

Funding

Feng Chia University

References (75)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20150240310.1002/adma.201502403 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matt.2019.03.01210.1016/j.matt.2019.03.012 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10582910.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105829 ↗
4. 10.1038/nmat408910.1038/nmat4089 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2023.10386310.1016/j.ijengsci.2023.103863 ↗
6. 10.1002/adfm.20100273310.1002/adfm.201002733 ↗
7. 10.1002/advs.20210396510.1002/advs.202103965 ↗
8. 10.1039/C1CS15106A10.1039/C1CS15106A ↗
9. 10.1126/science.110289610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.07.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2017.07.021 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.12.00710.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.12.007 ↗
12. 10.3390/ma904026210.3390/ma9040262 ↗
13. 10.1002/pc.2746210.1002/pc.27462 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0769010.1021/acsomega.3c07690 ↗
15. 10.1002/pc.2844110.1002/pc.28441 ↗
16. Bunde A · 2012
17. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0108910.1021/acsnano.7b01089 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.0c1106210.1021/acsami.0c11062 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.04310.1016/j.msec.2017.02.043 ↗
20. 10.1002/anie.20161017610.1002/anie.201610176 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0206110.1021/acsanm.1c02061 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10801510.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108015 ↗
23. 10.1039/C6NR00562D10.1039/C6NR00562D ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10942310.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109423 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c0044810.1021/acs.accounts.0c00448 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.10.01310.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.10.013 ↗
27. 10.1039/C7TA04208F10.1039/C7TA04208F ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b0193110.1021/acs.macromol.9b01931 ↗
29. 10.1021/jp405579610.1021/jp4055796 ↗
30. 10.1002/app.1332210.1002/app.13322 ↗
31. 10.1007/s10853-016-0549-510.1007/s10853-016-0549-5 ↗
32. 10.1002/app.4341910.1002/app.43419 ↗
33. 10.1126/science.121082210.1126/science.1210822 ↗
34. 10.1039/B511962F10.1039/B511962F ↗
35. 10.1021/ja105089w10.1021/ja105089w ↗
36. 10.1002/adma.20090158110.1002/adma.200901581 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.16530610.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165306 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10824010.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108240 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.06.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2011.06.014 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10942310.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109423 ↗
41. 10.1142/S179329201750144210.1142/S1793292017501442 ↗
42. 10.1021/jp027500u10.1021/jp027500u ↗
43. 10.1021/nl080604h10.1021/nl080604h ↗
44. 10.1021/jp100603h10.1021/jp100603h ↗
45. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0509110.1021/acsomega.0c05091 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.02.06010.1016/j.jmmm.2016.02.060 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.18740110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.187401 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.02.06710.1016/j.jcis.2018.02.067 ↗
49. 10.1007/s11356-023-30771-710.1007/s11356-023-30771-7 ↗
50. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c0418110.1021/acssuschemeng.2c04181 ↗
51. 10.1021/ma501729y10.1021/ma501729y ↗
52. 10.1021/ma071179210.1021/ma0711792 ↗
53. 10.1021/ma049164g10.1021/ma049164g ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.08.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2016.08.016 ↗
55. 10.1021/ma702385h10.1021/ma702385h ↗
56. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.06.05210.1016/j.carbon.2012.06.052 ↗
57. 10.1002/pen.2498110.1002/pen.24981 ↗
58. 10.1021/ma051031n10.1021/ma051031n ↗
59. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2003.08.00510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2003.08.005 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.01.02710.1016/j.polymer.2010.01.027 ↗
61. 10.1021/am200628c10.1021/am200628c ↗
62. 10.1088/0957-4484/23/36/36570210.1088/0957-4484/23/36/365702 ↗
63. 10.1021/ma300450t10.1021/ma300450t ↗
64. 10.1002/app.2774510.1002/app.27745 ↗
65. 10.1021/nn101962610.1021/nn1019626 ↗
66. 10.1103/PhysRevB.31.405310.1103/PhysRevB.31.4053 ↗
67. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.130510.1103/PhysRevLett.59.1305 ↗
68. 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.1247710.1103/PhysRevB.52.12477 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.12.14010.1016/j.matlet.2016.12.140 ↗
70. 10.1002/mame.20110003510.1002/mame.201100035 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.mser.2013.06.00110.1016/j.mser.2013.06.001 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.11.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2014.11.004 ↗
73. Bhattacharya SK · 1986
74. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.27110.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.271 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2003.11.00310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2003.11.003 ↗