Study on the tensile failure mechanisms of CFRP‐Al flat‐joggle‐flat bonded joints
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper focuses on CFRP‐Al bonded joints, experimentally investigating the effects of joint geometries, different types of adhesives, and overlap lengths on the mechanical properties of bonded joints. Digital Image Correlation (DIC) technology was used to monitor the entire tensile processes, and the deformations and fracture processes of the bonded joints were captured. The strain evolution processes of the joints were obtained through analysis, and quantitative analyses of the joint fracture surfaces were conducted. The results indicate that the special geometric shape of the Flat‐Joggle‐Flat (FJF) bonded joint reduce secondary bending effects. Additionally, the joggle section participates in load transfer, significantly enhancing the joint's mechanical performance and altering its failure mode. Joints using ductile adhesives exhibit higher tensile mechanical properties compared to those using brittle adhesives. Compared to the bearing capacity of single‐lap bonded joints with the same overlap length and adhesive, the mechanical performance improvement of FJF bonded joints using ductile adhesives is less pronounced than that of FJF bonded joints using brittle adhesives. Increasing the overlap length enhances the mechanical properties of bonded joints. This study is expected to provide a reference for the engineering application of FJF bonded joints. Highlights FJF joints have higher bearing capacities compared to single lap joints. Ductile adhesives can effectively increase the bearing capacities of joints. Increasing the overlap length can improve the bearing capacities of joints. The end and middle of the FJF joints jointly bear the load effect. The failure modes of FJF joints are different from that of single lap joints.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical, Electronic and Control Engineering Beijing Jiaotong University Beijing China
CRRC Qingdao Sifang Co., Ltd. Qingdao China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. CaiT.Analysis of composites bolted joints and study of secondary bending effect.2010Master: 66.
2. Xie M · 2016
3. Research on the secondary bending of composite‐metal adhesively bonded joints
4. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10914110.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109141 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11404910.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114049 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.09.00910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.09.009 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.11.00810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.11.008 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.07.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2015.07.014 ↗
9. 10.3390/ma1715384110.3390/ma17153841 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.06.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2017.06.011 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.06110.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.061 ↗
12. 10.1080/00218464.2017.136940710.1080/00218464.2017.1369407 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.10291210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.102912 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.10334510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103345 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.10267410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102674 ↗
16. 10.2514/2.119110.2514/2.1191 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.12.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.12.001 ↗
18. 10.1080/01694243.2017.139557810.1080/01694243.2017.1395578 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.02.00310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.02.003 ↗
20. Experimental study and numerical simulation on CFRP flat‐joggle‐flat joints
21. 10.1177/002199832092554210.1177/0021998320925542 ↗
22. 10.1002/mawe.20220026810.1002/mawe.202200268 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matlet.2023.13471310.1016/j.matlet.2023.134713 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matlet.2023.13573310.1016/j.matlet.2023.135733 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matlet.2023.13449110.1016/j.matlet.2023.134491 ↗
26. GuoS.Study of the mechanical performance and analysis of the failure behavior for adhesivly bonded joints between CFRP and steel DC04.2017Master: 71.
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.018 ↗
28. Effect of lap length on bonding properties of titanium alloy/aramid fiber composites single lap joints
29. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11611310.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116113 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.10351110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103511 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.12.00310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.12.003 ↗
32. Effect of overlap length on tensile properties and failure characteristics of CFRP single‐lap adhesive joints
33. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.02.01010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.02.010 ↗
34. 10.1080/00218464.2020.172588610.1080/00218464.2020.1725886 ↗
35. YangX.The mechanical properties of adhesive bonded joints for light weight automotives.2014Master: 55.
36. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10823710.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108237 ↗
37. 10.1007/s11665‐023‐08082‐210.1007/s11665‐023‐08082‐2 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.12.00310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.12.003 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.10248110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102481 ↗
40. 10.1002/pc.2829710.1002/pc.28297 ↗