journal article·2024-12-20Open access

Finite Element analysis and experimental study of static performance of multi‐CFRP tendon composite anchorage system

Xue Li, Kuihua Mei, Shiyu Sun, Yuanzhi Wang, Wenke Jia

Polymer Composites· Volume 45· Issue 18

Abstract

Abstract A novel composite anchorage with dispersed arrangement of carbon fiber‐reinforced polymer (CFRP) tendons was proposed. The bonding length and constraint ratio of the dispersed‐tendon composite anchorage were determined by numerical simulation. Six groups of multi‐CFRP tendon composite anchorage systems (MTCAS) were tested to investigate their static performance. The axial force dispersion coefficient cv and relative slip ratio coefficient δ were proposed to evaluate the static performance of the MTCAS with variables, including pre‐tension load, the inner inclination angle of the sleeve and the modified bonding medium. Results demonstrated that increasing the bonding length and restraint ratio of steel sleeve could improve the stress state of tendon in the anchorage. The anchorage with a bonding length of 280 mm and a constraint ratio of the sleeve of 0.90 can reliably anchor multiple CFRP tendons arranged in a dispersed arrangement. An inner inclination angle of 3.1° of the sleeve can be adopted on the premise that strength utilization ratio is guaranteed and anchorage diameter meets the requirements. An adequate pre‐tension load can reduce the slips of tendons, and the recommended pre‐tension load value should not exceed 0.7 Fptk. The 0.25% basalt fiber‐modified epoxy resin anchorage obtained the highest strength utilization ratio. Highlights A novel composite anchorage with dispersed carbon fiber‐reinforced polymer tendons was designed. New mechanical parameters evaluating anchorage performance were proposed. Basalt fiber (BF)‐modified epoxy resin (ER) can improve anchoring performance. The 0.25% BF‐modified ER anchorage obtained the highest strength utilization ratio. Pre‐tension load should not exceed 0.7 times the theoretical tensile load.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Highway Chang'an University Xi'an China

Urban‐Rural and Migration Engineering Business Division Zhejiang Design Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power Zhejiang Hangzhou China

Highway industrialized intelligent construction research center Gansu Province Transportation Planning, Survey & Design Institute Co., Ltd. Lanzhou China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.acme.2018.08.00710.1016/j.acme.2018.08.007 ↗
2. Development and application of composite in civil engineering
3. 10.3390/polym710150110.3390/polym7101501 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2782810.1002/pc.27828 ↗
5. 10.1007/s13369‐012‐0185‐610.1007/s13369‐012‐0185‐6 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.04910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.049 ↗
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.000009610.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.0000096 ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.000112410.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.0001124 ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.000008010.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.0000080 ↗
10. 10.15554/pcij.01011996.34.4410.15554/pcij.01011996.34.44 ↗
11. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.168-170.100610.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.168-170.1006 ↗
12. 10.1177/002199832093365810.1177/0021998320933658 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.13410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.134 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.006 ↗
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000150410.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001504 ↗
16. 10.4236/eng.2013.51111110.4236/eng.2013.511111 ↗
17. Performance of bonded anchorage for CFRP tendons affected by temperature or moisture
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.07210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.072 ↗
19. 10.1139/l03‐06210.1139/l03‐062 ↗
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.000124710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.0001247 ↗
21. 10.19721/j.cnki.1001‐7372.2016.01.00710.19721/j.cnki.1001‐7372.2016.01.007 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.09.03810.1016/j.engstruct.2013.09.038 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.000053710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.0000537 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.10.02410.1016/j.compstruct.2014.10.024 ↗
25. 10.1177/136943321982980610.1177/1369433219829806 ↗
26. 10.19721/j.cnki.1001‐7372.2023.04.01210.19721/j.cnki.1001‐7372.2023.04.012 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.05.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2015.05.014 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11759910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117599 ↗
29. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1088.85810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1088.858 ↗
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.000090010.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.0000900 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11170410.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111704 ↗
32. 10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG‐406810.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG‐4068 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.12.01210.1016/j.istruc.2020.12.012 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10801110.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108011 ↗
35. 10.19721/j.cnki.1001‐7372.2022.02.00710.19721/j.cnki.1001‐7372.2022.02.007 ↗
36. Standardization Administration of the P.R.C. (SAC) · 2021
37. 10.1007/s42765‐022‐00204‐010.1007/s42765‐022‐00204‐0 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.05010.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.050 ↗
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.000036710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.0000367 ↗
40. Standardization Administration of the P.R.C. (SAC) · 2023
41. Standardization Administration of the P.R.C. (SAC) · 2015
42. 10.1139/l00‐04810.1139/l00‐048 ↗
43. Cheng DX · 2010 · 8
44. 10.19721/j.cnki.1001‐7372.2022.02.00610.19721/j.cnki.1001‐7372.2022.02.006 ↗
45. Standardization Administration of the P.R.C. (SAC) · 2017