journal article·2025-10-20Open access

Hygrothermal Aging Studies on Adhesion Behavior of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticle‐Reinforced Mild Steel Adhesive Joints

P. Pragathi, S. Jeba Jenison, G. Raja Singh, K. Ashoka Vijayan, R. Velmurugan

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 15

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this research study, mild steel adherends were bonded using unreinforced and titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) nanoparticle‐reinforced adhesives (1.0 wt%, 2.0 wt%, 3.0 wt%, and 4.0 wt%) to form single‐lap joints. The adhesive joints were exposed to hygrothermal aging for 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks. Lap shear tests revealed that the mean shear strength of unreinforced adhesive joints was 10.627 MPa, and with reinforcement, the shear strength increased by up to 54% in unaged conditions. After 4 weeks of aging, shear strength reductions were observed, with unreinforced joints experiencing a 66% loss, while 3.0 wt% reinforced joints exhibited the lowest reduction at only 13%, demonstrating their effectiveness in maintaining adhesive strength. Water absorption was significantly reduced by up to 56% with reinforcement, minimizing moisture‐induced degradation. Contact angle measurements showed an increase in surface hydrophobicity, with the 3.0 wt% reinforced adhesive reaching the highest contact angle of 89° ± 2°. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) analysis confirmed changes in glass transition temperature ( T g ) due to aging. High‐resolution (HRSEM) analysis revealed morphological changes and crack formations, highlighting the impact of hygrothermal aging on adhesive joint durability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tribology and Wear Analysis · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Material Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras Chennai India

Defence Research & Development Laboratory Hyderabad India

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10758210.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107582 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.10245010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102450 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.11630310.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.116303 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.04.01610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.04.016 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.03.01710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.03.017 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.10298410.1016/j.tafmec.2021.102984 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.10284510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.102845 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15488310.1016/j.cej.2024.154883 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2683710.1002/pc.26837 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10693910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106939 ↗
11. Effect of Nanostructured Reinforcement of Adhesive on Thermal Cycling Performance of a Single‐Lap Joint With Composite Adherends10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107106 ↗
12. 10.1080/00218464.2016.125560610.1080/00218464.2016.1255606 ↗
13. 10.1080/00218464.2017.141580910.1080/00218464.2017.1415809 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2025.10395410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2025.103954 ↗
15. 10.1515/mt-2022-028410.1515/mt-2022-0284 ↗
16. 10.26701/ems.138555210.26701/ems.1385552 ↗
17. Effect of Particles on Tensile and Bending Properties of Jute Epoxy Composites
18. 10.3139/120.11103110.3139/120.111031 ↗
19. 10.1080/15376494.2023.224031910.1080/15376494.2023.2240319 ↗
20. 10.1515/jtam-2015-001910.1515/jtam-2015-0019 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.10330410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103304 ↗
22. 10.1163/15685610677845665410.1163/156856106778456654 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.001 ↗
24. 10.1080/00218464.2020.171265610.1080/00218464.2020.1712656 ↗
25. 10.1163/156856198X0042510.1163/156856198X00425 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.05110.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.051 ↗
27. 10.1080/00218464.2018.145273610.1080/00218464.2018.1452736 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.04010.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.040 ↗
29. 10.1080/01694243.2018.144729510.1080/01694243.2018.1447295 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12280310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122803 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.10917010.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.109170 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.00710.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.007 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.05510.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.055 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.04.01710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.04.017 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.10358410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103584 ↗
36. 10.1080/00218464.2023.228892210.1080/00218464.2023.2288922 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.13433610.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.134336 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.09.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2016.09.003 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.06010.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.060 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.apor.2024.10395910.1016/j.apor.2024.103959 ↗
41. 10.3139/120.11052110.3139/120.110521 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.13349110.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.133491 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14442810.1016/j.cej.2023.144428 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.10348110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103481 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.12827010.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.128270 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.13218010.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.132180 ↗
47. 10.1177/0731684423116789610.1177/07316844231167896 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.07.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2007.07.006 ↗
49. 10.1080/00218464.2012.72561910.1080/00218464.2012.725619 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.10347210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103472 ↗
51. 10.1002/pc.2823210.1002/pc.28232 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13405510.1016/j.cej.2021.134055 ↗