journal article·2025-09-20Open access

Improved adhesion between glass fiber and PAAm / SA hydrogel via a synergy strategy

Shiyi Zhou, Pan Li, Sihan Yin, Yi Lu, Jilong Wang, Xuefeng Hu, Xintian Zhang, Linfeng Deng, Yongkun Liu, Xiongfang Luo, Jian Wang, Lihua Lou, Jingjing Qiu, Zhuanyong Zou

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue S2

Abstract

Abstract Fiber‐reinforced hydrogels remain mechanically inferior to natural cartilage, primarily due to underexplored design issues at the matrix‐fiber interfaces. In this study, a synergy strategy combining chemical bonding, topology of connection, and energy dissipation is used to improve the interfacial properties of glass fiber and calcium crosslinking polyacrylamide/sodium alginate (PAAm/SA) double‐network hydrogels. Using γ‐(methacryloyloxy)propyltrimethoxysilane (TMSPMA) as a functional modifier is explored to enhance the chemical bonding between the glass fibers and hydrogels. Interfacial shear strength is quantified through pull‐out tests, revealing a significant improvement after chemical modification. Specifically, TMSPMA‐treated samples exhibit an interfacial shear strength of 28.8 ± 2.3 MPa, compared to 5.5 ± 0.4 MPa for untreated samples. The study further examines the influence of energy dissipation via ionic crosslinking, showing that Ca 2+ crosslinked hydrogels achieved superior interfacial strength (28.8 ± 2.3 MPa), which is 3–4 times higher than that of Ba 2+ and Fe 3+ crosslinked counterparts. Additionally, introducing 2–6 twists to the fiber bundle reduces interfacial strength by ~1.4–1.8‐fold, showing that topology area is also essential to the hydrogel adhesion. These findings contribute to the understanding of interfacial properties between fiber and hydrogel and hold potential for advancing load‐bearing biological substitute designs. Highlights Glass fiber is modified by TMSPMA to increase chemical bonding 2 wt% TMSPMA‐treated samples exhibit a superior interfacial shear strength of 28.8 MPa Higher concentration TMSPMA leads to filled gaps in glass fiber bundles. Ca 2+ crosslinked hydrogels achieved superior interfacial properties compared to Ba 2+ and Fe 3+ Hydrogel adhesion relies on chemical bonds, topology, area, and energy dissipation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Textile and Garment, Key Laboratory of Clean Dyeing and Finishing Technology of Zhejiang Province Shaoxing University Shaoxing China

Shaoxing Key Laboratory of High Performance Fibers & Products Shaoxing University Shaoxing China

Shaoxing Sub‐center of National Engineering Research Center for Fiber‐based Composites Shaoxing University Zhejiang, Shaoxing China

Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Advanced Textiles, College of Textiles Donghua University Shanghai China

NanoBio Mechanics & Manufacturing Laboratory (NBM^{2}), Department of Mechanical Engineering Clemson University Clemson South Carolina USA

Department of Mechanical Engineering Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.aaf362710.1126/science.aaf3627 ↗
2. 10.1039/C7TB01279A10.1039/C7TB01279A ↗
3. 10.1007/978-0-387-73906-9_1010.1007/978-0-387-73906-9_10 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20140344110.1002/adma.201403441 ↗
5. 10.1021/ma802148p10.1021/ma802148p ↗
6. 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.12280110.1016/j.polymer.2020.122801 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20030490710.1002/adma.200304907 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41578-018-0066-z10.1038/s41578-018-0066-z ↗
9. 10.1002/1521-4095(200104)13:7<485::AID-ADMA485>3.0.CO;2-T10.1002/1521-4095(200104)13:7<485::AID-ADMA485>3.0.CO;2-T ↗
10. 10.1039/C8SM00376A10.1039/C8SM00376A ↗
11. 10.1021/ma800476x10.1021/ma800476x ↗
12. 10.1038/s41551-017-004410.1038/s41551-017-0044 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.coco.2021.10078510.1016/j.coco.2021.100785 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.10037410.1016/j.coco.2020.100374 ↗
15. 10.1002/agt2.3310.1002/agt2.33 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20170033910.1002/adma.201700339 ↗
17. 10.1177/088532821453058910.1177/0885328214530589 ↗
18. 10.1002/adfm.20130048310.1002/adfm.201300483 ↗
19. 10.1021/am503878d10.1021/am503878d ↗
20. 10.1039/C5MH00127G10.1039/C5MH00127G ↗
21. 10.1039/C9TA02326G10.1039/C9TA02326G ↗
22. 10.1016/j.eml.2014.11.00110.1016/j.eml.2014.11.001 ↗
23. 10.1007/s12221-024-00781-410.1007/s12221-024-00781-4 ↗
24. 10.3390/ma1804074510.3390/ma18040745 ↗
25. 10.1002/pc.2859110.1002/pc.28591 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.01110.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.011 ↗
27. 10.1039/C3SM52272E10.1039/C3SM52272E ↗
28. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00136-610.1016/S1359-835X(00)00136-6 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.05.00410.1016/j.actbio.2014.05.004 ↗
30. 10.1007/978-3-319-65145-3_210.1007/978-3-319-65145-3_2 ↗
31. 10.1039/C4SM01039F10.1039/C4SM01039F ↗
32. 10.1002/adfm.20190169310.1002/adfm.201901693 ↗
33. 10.3390/polym1511251710.3390/polym15112517 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0429110.1021/acs.langmuir.8b04291 ↗
35. 10.1038/nmat446310.1038/nmat4463 ↗
36. 10.1088/0508-3443/3/3/30210.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.bej.2023.10889510.1016/j.bej.2023.108895 ↗
38. 10.1002/app.4818210.1002/app.48182 ↗
39. 10.1021/jp067906x10.1021/jp067906x ↗