Temperature field and curing degree prediction of large composite blades based on coupled finite element analysis and machine learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Since large composite blades are variable curvature and thickness components with large dimensions, the temperature field analysis will produce a large inhomogeneous temperature field, which requires a lot of time. In this paper, a new method combining finite element analysis and machine learning is proposed. By constructing a numerical model of blade temperature field curing and using zoned heating to optimize the temperature and curing gradient in the tongue and groove region, the maximum temperature gradient is reduced by 74.18% and the maximum curing degree gradient is reduced by 21.987% compared with the conventional temperature profile curing. A long short‐term memory(LSTM) neural network was used to predict the temperature field and curing gradient variations, and the Grey Wolf algorithm was used to optimize the parameters with high model prediction accuracy. The method is instructive for online monitoring and control of the curing process in customized hot press tanks. Highlights The zoned heating method improves the temperature‐field balance. A tandem LSTM neural network is constructed as an agent model. Enabling the temperature field to be connected to the degree of cure. Optimizing tandem LSTM model parameters using the grey wolf algorithm.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Jiangsu Institute of Technology Changzhou China
School of Materials Science and Technology Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Nanjing China
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. A review on characteristics of composite and advanced materials used for aerospace applications
2. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.11.15110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.11.151 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10853-021-06401-310.1007/s10853-021-06401-3 ↗
4. 10.1088/1361-665X/ad9c0610.1088/1361-665X/ad9c06 ↗
5. 10.1177/089270571351526310.1177/0892705713515263 ↗
6. 10.3390/polym1310162210.3390/polym13101622 ↗
7. 10.3390/s2201015310.3390/s22010153 ↗
8. 10.1080/15376494.2022.208890910.1080/15376494.2022.2088909 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.aiepr.2023.08.00310.1016/j.aiepr.2023.08.003 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11205810.1016/j.tws.2024.112058 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.10298810.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102988 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.10295610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.102956 ↗
13. A review on the tooling technologies for composites manufacturing of aerospace structures: materials, structures and processes
14. 10.3390/ma1307172010.3390/ma13071720 ↗
15. Business analytics in manufacturing: current trends, challenges and pathway to market leadership
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.07410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.074 ↗
17. 10.1002/pc.2730510.1002/pc.27305 ↗
18. 10.3390/polym1511243710.3390/polym15112437 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10443-022-10022-710.1007/s10443-022-10022-7 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00170-024-13356-710.1007/s00170-024-13356-7 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11539110.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115391 ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.2722310.1002/pc.27223 ↗
23. Temperature optimization of mold for autoclave process of large composite manufacturing
24. 10.3390/aerospace805013010.3390/aerospace8050130 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10443-020-09836-010.1007/s10443-020-09836-0 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.02.09610.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.02.096 ↗
27. 10.1115/1.403999010.1115/1.4039990 ↗
28. 10.1002/app.5321810.1002/app.53218 ↗
29. 10.1007/s42824-024-00122-z10.1007/s42824-024-00122-z ↗
30. 10.1002/pat.649810.1002/pat.6498 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0168-874X(03)00119-710.1016/S0168-874X(03)00119-7 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11282210.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112822 ↗
33. 10.3390/electronics1222465210.3390/electronics12224652 ↗
34. 10.1080/10426914.2018.151211610.1080/10426914.2018.1512116 ↗
35. Synergistic control of curing temperature and curing degree of composite materials based on temperature curve optimization
36. 10.1007/s10443-016-9499-y10.1007/s10443-016-9499-y ↗
37. 10.1149/1945-7111/ad442110.1149/1945-7111/ad4421 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10945510.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109455 ↗
39. Numerical simulation of thermal‐fluid‐solid multi‐field strong coupling during curing of variable cross‐section composite structures based on resin flow
40. 10.3390/en1318478210.3390/en13184782 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.10836810.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108368 ↗