journal article·2025-04-10Open access

Lab‐scale manufacturing of thermoplastic matrix‐continuous carbon fiber filaments for additive manufacturing: Melt impregnation, properties of the filaments and its printed composites

Yunus Alp Sütcüler, Guy J. P. Bex, Cesar A. Stupp, Mehmet Kodal, A. Tessa ten Cate, Güralp Özkoç

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 5

Abstract

Abstract Additive manufacturing encounters significant barriers to its broader application in large‐scale production. This research seeks to mitigate critical limitations, including a trade‐off between impregnation speed and quality in filament preparation and inconsistent fiber distribution in continuous carbon filaments (CCFs), mainly attributed to the rounding process of unidirectional tapes and insufficient interlayer adhesion. A novel lab‐scale impregnation line was engineered to address these challenges, facilitating the production of CCFs using three distinct types of carbon fiber in conjunction with recycled glycol‐modified poly(ethylene terephthalate) (rPETG) resin. This new lab‐scale process produces uniform fiber distribution within PETG matrix and prevents S‐shaped distortions typically observed in conventionally rounded tapes. The type of carbon fiber sizing influences the impregnation process and tensile strength of the CCFs. Specifically, CCFs with flexible sizing demonstrated a 15% reduction in tensile strength due to fuzz formation during impregnation. These CCFs were subsequently employed in 3D printing applications, with the fabricated composite components subjected to interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) testing. The study concludes that recycled PETG is a viable additive manufacturing material when combined with appropriately sized carbon fibers. Additionally, it highlights the advantages of omitting the rounding stage, which enhances the quality of CCF and optimizes production efficiency. Highlights A lab‐scale direct melt impregnation system was designed in this study. The impact of different sizing types on carbon fibers was investigated. 3D‐printed continuous fiber filaments were prepared. New lab‐scale process produces uniform fiber distribution within PETG matrix. S‐shaped distortions observed in conventionally rounded tapes were prevented.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Material Selection and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

DowAksa Advanced Composites Yalova Turkey

Polymer Science and Technology Graduate Programme Kocaeli University İzmit/Kocaeli Turkey

The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO) Eindhoven The Netherlands

Brightlands Materials Center Geleen The Netherlands

Department of Chemical Engineering Kocaeli University İzmit/Kocaeli Turkey

Sabancı University Nanotechnology Research and Application Center Istanbul Turkey

Xplore Instruments B.V Sittard The Netherlands

Department of Chemistry Istinye University Istanbul Turkey

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jksues.2020.07.00710.1016/j.jksues.2020.07.007 ↗
2. 10.3390/buildings1306150910.3390/buildings13061509 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00170‐018‐03269‐710.1007/s00170‐018‐03269‐7 ↗
4. 10.1533/9780857095145.1.15410.1533/9780857095145.1.154 ↗
5. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.742.47310.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.742.473 ↗
6. 3D Printing Thermoplastic Market: Trends Opportunities and Competitive Analysis 2023–2028.
7. 10.1177/14782391960040070110.1177/147823919600400701 ↗
8. 10.1179/174328008X32522310.1179/174328008X325223 ↗
9. 10.1117/12.208252110.1117/12.2082521 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.2614310.1002/pc.26143 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.19310.1016/j.procir.2016.02.193 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.001 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10577010.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105770 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.00710.1016/j.addma.2018.05.007 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.03910.1016/j.addma.2018.04.039 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10782010.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107820 ↗
17. 10.1080/20550340.2019.171002310.1080/20550340.2019.1710023 ↗
18. 10.1177/089270570403540610.1177/0892705704035406 ↗
19. 10.1177/08927057990120040310.1177/089270579901200403 ↗
20. Development of a Rapid Thermoplastic Impregnation Device. PhD Thesis. TU Delft.2007https://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:0bdbe6b1-df28-4d52-948d-1c25a901de75.
21. 10.1023/a:100425353106110.1023/a:1004253531061 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.07.00810.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.07.008 ↗
23. 10.1177/1558925023118315910.1177/15589250231183159 ↗
24. 10.1186/s10033‐021‐00538‐710.1186/s10033‐021‐00538‐7 ↗
25. 10.1088/1757‐899x/1057/1/01203110.1088/1757‐899x/1057/1/012031 ↗